Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Dermatology Online Journal

Dermatology Online Journal bannerUC Davis

Non-healing verrucous plaque over upper limb for 1 year in a tea garden worker

Main Content

Non-healing verrucous plaque over upper limb for 1 year in a tea garden worker
Rajesh Kumar Mandal1 MD, Sabyasachi Banerjee1 MD, Piyush Kumar2 MD, Indranil Chakrabarti1 MD
Dermatology Online Journal 19 (3): 12

1. North Bengal Medical College, Siliguri, West Bengal, India
2. Katihar Medical College, Katihar, Bihar, India


Abstract

A 55-year-old tea garden worker presented with a slowly growing verrucous plaque on the right arm. The diagnosis of chromomycosis was confirmed by the identification of brown sclerotic bodies in a skin biopsy.



Introduction


Figure 1Figure 2
Figure 1. Well defined verrucous plaque with scarring, crusting and scales

Figure 2. Pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia with intraepidermal abscess (H&E x100) and copper penny bodies shown with a pointer in the window (H&E x400)

Figure 3
Figure 3. Brown colored septate sclerotic bodies (H&E x400)

A 55-year-old tea garden worker presented with a slowly growing, slightly erythematous, verrucous plaque over her right arm (Figure 1). The lesion started one year prior as a small papule and gradually increased in size to the present status. At the same time, some new lesions appeared around the primary site. The surface of the plaque was notable for crusting and scaling; slight skin atrophy was observed. She had been treated with topical steroids without any response and later had received anti-tubercular treatment because of clinical suspicion of cutaneous tuberculosis, again, without any response. The rest of the history and physical examination were unremarkable. Routine hematological and biochemical investigations were within normal limits. A skin biopsy was performed. The histopathological findings are shown in Figures 2 and 3.


Histological findings

Multiple sections stained with hematoxyline and eosin showed pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia, marked hyperkeratosis, and dense infiltration of polymorphs in the upper and mid-dermis forming micro-abscesses. Few golden brown round structures showing separation at places were observed focally in the dermis and represented sclerotic bodies. Sclerotic bodies are the small brown fungal forms, which are round with thick bilaminate walls 4-6 μm in diameter, which occur singly or in clusters and are diagnostic of chromoblastomycosis.


Discussion

Chromoblastomycosis is a chronic fungal infection of the skin and subcutaneous tissue caused by pigmented or dematiaceous fungi, which in infected tissue produce thick-walled,dark brown structures known as sclerotic or muriform bodies. These bodies have vertical and horizontal septa inside and are found singly, in clusters, or within the giant cells [1, 2]. There are several dematiceous fungi causing chromomycosis, amongst them Fonsecaeae pedrosoi is the most common causative organism. Other fungi, which can cause the disease, are Fonsecaeae compacta, Phialophora verrucosa, Cladosporium carionii, Rhinocladiella aquaspersa, Botryomyces caespitosus [3]. The fungi are usually found in soil, wood, and rotting vegetation and the infection usually occurs following trauma with vegetative matter causing direct inoculation of the fungi [1]. The condition mainly affects middle-aged male agricultural workers. The lesions commonly involve the lower limbs, whereas the upper limbs and face are only rarely affected. Our patient, a tea garden worker, was prone to injury over the upper limbs while plucking tea leaves in dense tea bushes. The disease is mainly seen in tropical and subtropical countries, Africa, Australia, and Japan.

Clinically, chromomycosis starts as a nodule over the implantation site, which slowly evolves into a verrucous plaque and may ulcerate. Sometimes, there may be deposition of black dots over the lesion; these are helpful diagnostic clues. Associated lymphadenitis may be present owing to secondary bacterial infection. Rarely, dissemination to brain can occur. Apart from the verrucous presentation, there may be vegetative, fistulous, granulomatous, and squamous presentations [4].

Chromomycosis may be clinically confused with tubercular verrucosa cutis, sporotrichosis, lupus vulgaris, and even squamous cell carcinoma. Our patient was incorrectly managed for tubercular verrucosa cutis.

Histopathological findings of cutaneous chromoblastomycosis are marked epitheliomatous hyperplasia, intraepidermal abscesses containing inflammatory cells, and the presence of sclerotic (copper penny) bodies. These sclerotic bodies are 5-12 m in diameter and are diagnostic of chromoblastomycosis. The dermis is suppurative and granulomatous with the presence of histiocytes, giant cells, plasma cells, eosinophils, and abscess formation. The diagnosis can be confirmed by direct microscopic examination of a 10 percent KOH preparation of the scrapings taken from crust, which may reveal small, round, thick-walled, brownish septate, sclerotic bodies. Full identification of the fungus needs fungal culture.

Currently chemotherapy has become the first-line of treatment with itraconazole and terbinafine being the drugs of choice, whereas surgery is used only for limited or small lesions [5].

References

1. López Martínez R, Méndez Tovar LJ. Chromoblastomycosis. Clin Dermatol. 2007 Mar-Apr; 25(2):188-94. [PubMed]

2. Correia RT, Valente NY, Criado PR, Martins JE. Chromoblastomycosis: study of 27 cases and review of medical literature. An Bras Dermatol. 2010 Jul-Aug; 85(4):448-54. [PubMed]

3. Pires CA, Xavier MB, Quaresma JA, Macedo GM, Sousa BR, Brito AC. Clinical, epidemiological and mycological report on 65 patients from the Eastern Amazon region with chromoblastomycosis. An Bras Dermatol. 2012 Aug; 87(4):555-60. [PubMed]

4. Park SG, Oh SH, Suh SB, Lee KH, Chung KY. A case of chromoblastomycosis with an unusual clinical manifestation caused by Phialophora verrucosa on an unexposed area: treatment with a combination of amphotericin B and 5-flucytosine. Br J Dermatol. 2005 Mar; 152(3):560-4. [PubMed]

5. Minotto R, Bernardi CD, Mallmann LF, Edelweiss MI, Scroferneker ML. Chromoblastomycosis: a review of 100 cases in state of Rio Grande do sul, Brazil. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2001;44:585-92. [PubMed]

6. Pradeepkumar NS, Joseph NM. Chromoblastomycosis caused by Cladophialophora carrionii in a child from India. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2011 July 27;5(7):556-560. [PubMed]

7. Mouchalouat Mde F, Gutierrez Galhardo MC, Zancopé-Oliveira RM, Monteiro Fialho PC, de Oliveira Coelho JM, Silva Tavares PM, Francesconi do Valle AC. Chromoblastomycosis: a clinical and molecular study of 18 cases in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Int J Dermatol. 2011 Aug; 50(8): 981-986. [PubMed]

8. Bonifaz A, Carrasco-Gerard E, Saúl A. Chromoblastomycosis: clinical and mycologic experience of 51 cases. Mycoses. 2001; 44(1-2):1-7. [PubMed]

9. Muñoz Estrada VF, Valenzuela Paz GA, Rochín Tolosa M. [Chromomycosis: report of a case with unusual topography]. Rev Iberoam Micol. 2011; 28(1):50-2. [PubMed]

© 2013 Dermatology Online Journal