Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
Can Peer Review Be Kinder? Supportive Peer Review: A Re-Commitment to Kindness and a Call to Action
- Clase, Catherine M;
- Dicks, Elizabeth;
- Holden, Rachel;
- Sood, Manish M;
- Levin, Adeera;
- Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar;
- Moore, Linda W;
- Bartlett, Susan J;
- Bello, Aminu K;
- Bohm, Clara;
- Bridgewater, Darren;
- Bouchard, Josee;
- Burger, Dylan;
- Carrero, Juan Jesús;
- Donald, Maoliosa;
- Elliott, Meghan;
- Goldenberg, Maya J;
- Jardine, Meg;
- Lam, Ngan N;
- Maddigan, W Joy;
- Madore, François;
- Mavrakanas, Thomas A;
- Molnar, Amber O;
- Prasad, GV Ramesh;
- Rigatto, Claudio;
- Tennankore, Karthik K;
- Torban, Elena;
- Trainor, Laurel;
- White, Christine A;
- Hartwig, Sunny
- et al.
Abstract
Peer review aims to select articles for publication and to improve articles before publication. We believe that this process can be infused by kindness without losing rigor. In 2014, the founding editorial team of the Canadian Journal of Kidney Health and Disease (CJKHD) made an explicit commitment to treat authors as we would wish to be treated ourselves. This broader group of authors reaffirms this principle, for which we suggest the terminology "supportive review."
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%