- Main
Whats in This For You? Whats in This For Me?: A Win-Win Perspective of Involving Study Advisory Committee Members in Palliative Care Research.
- Booker-Vaughns, Juanita;
- Rosini, Dawn;
- Batra, Romilla;
- Kizzie-Gillett, Constance;
- Maguire, Margaret;
- Navarro, Martha;
- Reddy Pidatala, Neha;
- Vaughan, William;
- Welsh, Sally;
- Williams, Pluscedia;
- Young-Brinn, Angela;
- Van Allen, Kaitlyn;
- Cuthel, Allison;
- Liddicoat Yamarik, Rebecca;
- Flannery, Mara;
- Goldfeld, Keith;
- Grudzen, Corita;
- Dunn, Patrick;
- Galvin, Robert;
- Hopkins, Ernest;
- Isaacs, Eric;
- Chan, Garrett
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735231224562Abstract
Study advisory committees (SACs) provide critical value to clinical trials by providing unique perspectives that pull from personal and professional experiences related to the trials healthcare topic. The Emergency Medicine Palliative Care Access (EMPallA) study had the privilege of convening a 16-person SAC from the projects inception to completion. The study team wanted to understand the impact this project had on the SAC members. In this narrative, we use reflective dialogue to share SAC members lived experiences and the impact the EMPallA study has had on members both personally and professionally. We detail the (1) benefits SAC members, specifically patients, and caregivers, have had through working on this project. (2) The importance of recruiting diverse SAC members with different lived experiences and leveraging their feedback in clinical research. (3) Value of community capacity building to ensure the common vision of the clinical trial is promoted.
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-