Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Effect of waivers of consent on recruitment in acute stroke trials: A systematic review.

  • Author(s): Feldman, William B
  • Kim, Anthony S
  • Josephson, S Andrew
  • Lowenstein, Daniel H
  • Chiong, Winston
  • et al.

Published Web Location

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4836887/
No data is associated with this publication.
Abstract

There is urgent need for clinical trials of novel interventions to reduce the burden of acute ischemic stroke. A key impediment to such trials is slow recruitment. Since obtaining written informed consent in the setting of acute stroke is especially challenging, some experts have endorsed relaxing the requirement for informed consent by permitting verbal consent or waivers to facilitate recruitment. This systematic review of 36 randomized controlled trials of acute interventions for ischemic stroke assesses whether alternatives to written informed consent are associated with increased recruitment rates. After the exclusion of 2 outlier trials that differed from other trials in conduct and interventions studied, no association was observed on univariable analysis (8.9 participants/month in trials requiring written consent vs 6.1 participants/month in trials with alternatives, p = 0.43) or multivariable analysis (when adjusting for the number of centers, number of countries, and exclusions based on modified Rankin Scale scores). Alternatives to written informed consent in acute stroke trials may enable trial designs that would not be feasible otherwise. However, we did not find evidence that, within traditional trial designs, such alternatives are associated with faster recruitment.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Item not freely available? Link broken?
Report a problem accessing this item