Skip to main content

Open Access Publications from the University of California

Search eScholarship

Refine Search

All of eScholarshipThis Series

UC Irvine

UC Irvine Previously Published Works banner

Menu

About eScholarship
UC Open Access Policies
Journals
Academic Units

eScholarship
UC Irvine
UC Irvine Previously Published Works

Main
- PDF

Share

From bombs to boons: changing views of risk and regulation in the pre-crisis OTC derivatives market

2020

Lockwood, Erin

Published Web Location

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-020-09386-1

Creative Commons 'BY' version 4.0 license

Main Content

For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.

Highlight all Match case

Whole words

Current View

Current View

Enter the password to open this PDF file:

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Preparing document for printing…

0%

Jump To

Ultimate source of change
Who is a legitimate bearer of risk?
Who deserves public protection from adverse financial consequences?
Protection from what?
Perception of risk
1970s-1980s
Commodity Futures Trading Commission Act + Treasury Amendment
Financial innovation (financial derivatives)
“sophisticated” or “professional” investors
Small-scale financial market participants
Protection from own lack of technical mastery of market dynamics and opaque workings of the market
Only manageable via sophisticated quantitative models; inheres in firms
Ultimate source of change
Who is a legitimate bearer of risk?
Who deserves public protection from adverse financial consequences?
Protection from what?
Perception of risk
Early 1990s
Ideology (public regulation is needed to manage systemic risk vs. private regulation is sufficient to prevent systemic risk) + crisis (S&L crisis)
Sophisticated investors and banks armed with risk management divisions; the market as a system (market discipline)
Financial market participants not involved in off-balance-sheet financial activity + non-financial actors such as municipalities (GAO)
Financial industry can and should regulate itself (G-30 report; CFTC in exempting OTC transactions from CEA)
Protection from financial system collapse/crisis (1994 GAO report)
Normal workings of a market do not merit protection (G-30 report)
Systemic phenomenon (Corrigan, 1994 GAO report)
firm-level phenomenon amenable to quantitative modeling and management
Ultimate source of change
Who is a legitimate bearer of risk?
Who deserves public protection from adverse financial consequences?
Protection from what?
Perception of risk
Mid-1990s-early 21st century
Ideology (self-regulating markets are in the public interest)
Firms, via private risk-management systems; the market as a system; individual “rogue” traders
Only victims of fraud
Protection from fraud; normal workings of the market, including firm collapse, do not merit protection
Financial risk is essential to deep and liquid financial markets and in the public interest

Metrics
Author & Article Info

Related Items

Atrial fibrillation genetic risk differentiates cardioembolic stroke from other stroke subtypes.
A Smartphone Application as a Telemedicine Tool for Stroke Care Management.
Flare Spots in Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Images of Bioabsorbable Stents
Overview of Facial Plastic Surgery and Current Developments.
Design, Construction, and Test of Compact, Distributed-Charge, X-Band Accelerator Systems that Enable Image-Guided, VHEE FLASH Radiotherapy.

Home
About eScholarship
Campus Sites
UC Open Access Policy
eScholarship Publishing
Accessibility
Privacy Statement
Site Policies
Terms of Use
Admin Login
Help

Powered by the
California Digital Library
Copyright © 2017
The Regents of the University of California