UCSF

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of various pelvic fixation techniques and number of rods on biomechanics of the proximal junction of long thoracolumbar posterior instrumented fusions. METHODS: A validated spinopelvic finite-element (FE) model was instrumented with L5-S1 ALIF and one of the following 9 posterior instrumentation configurations: (A) one traditional iliac screw bilaterally (2 Iliac/2 Rods); (B) T10 to S1 (Sacral Only); (C) unilateral traditional iliac screw (1 Iliac/2 Rods); (D) one traditional iliac screw bilaterally with one midline accessory rod (2 Iliac/3 rods); (E) S2AI screws connected directly to the midline rods (2 S2AI/2 Rods); and two traditional iliac screws bilaterally with two lateral accessory rods connected to the main rods at varying locations (F1: T10-11, F2: T11-12, F3: T12-L1, F4: L1-2) (4 Iliac/4 Rods). Range of motions (ROM) at T10-S1 and T9-T10 were recorded and compared between models. The T9-T10 intradiscal pressures and stresses of the T9-10 discs annulus in addition to the von Mises stresses of the T9 and T10 vertebral bodies were recorded and compared. RESULTS: For T10-S1 ROM, 4 iliac/4 rods had lowest ROM in flexion and extension, while 2 S2AI/2 rods showed lowest ROM in rotation. Constructs with 3 or 4 rods had lower stresses on the primary rods compared to 2-rod constructs. At the proximal adjacent disc (T9-10), 4 iliac/4 rods showed lowest ROM, lowest intradiscal pressures, and lowest annular stress in all directions (most pronounced in flexion-extension). Under flexion and extension, 4 iliac/4 rods also showed the lowest von Mises stresses on the T10 vertebral body but the highest stresses on the T9 vertebral body. CONCLUSIONS: Dual iliac screws with 4 rods across the lumbosacral junction and extending to the thoracolumbar junction demonstrated the lowest T10-S1 ROM, the lowest adjacent segment disc (T9-T10) ROM, intradiscal pressures, and annular stresses, and the lowest UIV stresses, albeit with the highest UIV + 1 stresses. Additional studies are needed to confirm whether these biomechanical findings dictate clinical outcomes and effect rates of proximal junctional kyphosis and failure.