Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Explaining Support for Punitive Crime Policy: Race, Social Context, and Voting Behavior

Abstract

By treating criminal justice ballot propositions as race-implicit policies that disproportionately harm racial minorities, this article explores the hypothesis that a change in social context increases support for punitive criminal justice policies. To do so, it draws on insights from two related specifications of Social Identity Theory: Racial Threat Hypothesis and Contact Theory. The analysis offers two methodological innovations: first, it uses longitudinal rather than cross-sectional data to more precisely capture the effect of individuals’ experience; second, it draws upon a broader conceptualization of social context that includes not only racial composition of a county, but SES and education. The primary finding is that change in income and education levels by race/ethnicity and county-level political affiliation are significant predictors of support for race-implicit policies. The article concludes with a proposal for a mid-range theory of political behavior that takes into account the power of implicit messages about race in the political domain.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View