Skip to main content
Committee on High‐quality Alzheimer's Disease Studies (CHADS) consensus report
- Jicha, Greg A;
- Abner, Erin L;
- Arnold, Steven E;
- Carrillo, Maria C;
- Dodge, Hiroko H;
- Edland, Steven D;
- Fargo, Keith N;
- Feldman, Howard H;
- Goldstein, Larry B;
- Hendrix, James;
- Peters, Ruth;
- Robillard, Julie M;
- Schneider, Lon S;
- Titiner, Jodi R;
- Weber, Christopher J;
- Research and Treatment, the Clinical Trial Advancement Methodology Professional Interest Area of the International Society to Advance Alzheimer's
- et al.
Abstract
Background
Consensus guidance for the development and identification of high-quality Alzheimer's disease clinical trials is needed for protocol development and conduct of clinical trials.Methods
An ad hoc consensus committee was convened in conjunction with the Alzheimer's Association to develop consensus recommendations.Results
Consensus was readily reached for the need to provide scientific justification, registration of trials, institutional review board oversight, conflict of interest disclosure, funding source disclosure, defined trial population, recruitment resources, definition of the intervention, specification of trial duration, appropriate payment for participant engagement, risk-benefit disclosure as part of the consent process, and the requirement to disseminate and/or publish trial results even if the study is negative.Conclusions
This consensus guidance should prove useful for the protocol development and conduct of clinical trials, and may further provide a platform for the development of education materials that may help guide appropriate clinical trial participation decisions for potential trial participants and the general public.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.