Sovereignty and the Structure of Dependency at Northern Ute
Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Sovereignty and the Structure of Dependency at Northern Ute

Published Web Location

https://doi.org/10.17953Creative Commons 'BY-NC' version 4.0 license
Abstract

INTRODUCTION In 1983, prompted by allegations that there were some economic successes among tribes rich in energy resources, I initiated research among two tribes that were most frequently cited as successful: the Northern Ute (Uintah and Ouray Ute Indian Reservation) of eastern Utah, and the Crow of south-central Montana. Inasmuch as my colleagues and I had been monitoring energy resource-rich tribes for about twelve years and not one of us had observed the development of a profitable, self-sustaining economic base among the reservation societies that we had studied, I was skeptical of the claims for economic successes. The skepticism was not borne solely of observations. I was also skeptical because of my knowledge of the political-economic niche that American Indians have occupied since subjugation, but puzzled as to whether Federal Indian legislation of the 1970s had made such a difference as to facilitate development. The Reagan Administration's "New Federalism" had been rolling on line for two years, the Indian Self-Determination Act for eight years, the Indian Financing Act for nine years, and the rapid extraction of Indian-owned energy resources for ten years (following the Arab oil embargo) when my students, Stephanie Reynolds Romeo, LaVerna Price, and JoAnna Endter, and I began our inquiry among the Northern Utes and Crows. If these tribes had been successful in implementing the provisions of the

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View