Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UCSF

UC San Francisco Previously Published Works bannerUCSF

Sex differences in LRRK2 G2019S and idiopathic Parkinson's Disease.

  • Author(s): San Luciano, Marta
  • Wang, Cuiling
  • Ortega, Roberto A
  • Giladi, Nir
  • Marder, Karen
  • Bressman, Susan
  • Saunders-Pullman, Rachel
  • Michael J Fox Foundation LRRK2 Consortium
  • et al.

Published Web Location

https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.489
Abstract

Objective:To evaluate sex differences and the relative effect of G2019S LRRK2 mutations in Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods:530 LRRK2 PD carriers and 759 noncarrier PD (idiopathic, IPD) evaluated as part of the Fox Foundation (MJFF) Consortium were included. All participants completed a study visit including information on clinical features, treatment, examination, and motor and nonmotor questionnaires. Clinical features were compared between men and women separately for IPD and LRRK2 PD; and features were compared between IPD and LRRK2 PD separately for men and women. Results:Among IPD: men had higher levodopa equivalency dose (LED), worse activities of daily living and motoric severity but lower complications of therapy (UPDRS-IV). IPD women had higher olfaction and thermoregulatory scores and were more likely to report family history of PD. Among LRRK2 PD: Male predominance was not observed among G2019S LRRK2 cases. Women had worse UPDRS-IV but better olfaction. Among same sex:LRRK2 men and women had better olfaction than IPD counterparts. LRRK2 men demonstrated lower motor and higher cognitive, RBD and thermoregulation scores than IPD men and LRRK2 women had greater UDPRS-IV and rates of dyskinesia. Interpretation:There were clinical differences between sexes with a more severe phenotype in IPD men and more complications of therapy in women. The more severe male phenotype was moderated by LRRK2, with LRRK2 men and women showing less diversity of phenotype. Our study supports that both genetics and sex drive phenotype, and thus trials in LRRK2 and IPD should consider gender stratification in design or analysis.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Main Content
Current View