- Main
A Contemporary Prostate Biopsy Risk Calculator Based on Multiple Heterogeneous Cohorts
- Ankerst, Donna P;
- Straubinger, Johanna;
- Selig, Katharina;
- Guerrios, Lourdes;
- De Hoedt, Amanda;
- Hernandez, Javier;
- Liss, Michael A;
- Leach, Robin J;
- Freedland, Stephen J;
- Kattan, Michael W;
- Nam, Robert;
- Haese, Alexander;
- Montorsi, Francesco;
- Boorjian, Stephen A;
- Cooperberg, Matthew R;
- Poyet, Cedric;
- Vertosick, Emily;
- Vickers, Andrew J
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2018.05.003Abstract
BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer prediction tools provide quantitative guidance for doctor-patient decision-making regarding biopsy. The widely used online Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial Risk Calculator (PCPTRC) utilized data from the 1990s based on six-core biopsies and outdated grading systems. OBJECTIVE: We prospectively gathered data from men undergoing prostate biopsy in multiple diverse North American and European institutions participating in the Prostate Biopsy Collaborative Group (PBCG) in order to build a state-of-the-art risk prediction tool. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We obtained data from 15 611 men undergoing 16 369 prostate biopsies during 2006-2017 at eight North American institutions for model-building and three European institutions for validation. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We used multinomial logistic regression to estimate the risks of high-grade prostate cancer (Gleason score ≥7) on biopsy based on clinical characteristics, including age, prostate-specific antigen, digital rectal exam, African ancestry, first-degree family history, and prior negative biopsy. We compared the PBCG model to the PCPTRC using internal cross-validation and external validation on the European cohorts. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Cross-validation on the North American cohorts (5992 biopsies) yielded the PBCG model area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) as 75.5% (95% confidence interval: 74.2-76.8), a small improvement over the AUC of 72.3% (70.9-73.7) for the PCPTRC (p<0.0001). However, calibration and clinical net benefit were far superior for the PBCG model. Using a risk threshold of 10%, clinical use of the PBCG model would lead to the equivalent of 25 fewer biopsies per 1000 patients without missing any high-grade cancers. Results were similar on external validation on 10 377 European biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: The PBCG model should be used in place of the PCPTRC for prediction of prostate biopsy outcome. PATIENT SUMMARY: A contemporary risk tool for outcomes on prostate biopsy based on the routine clinical risk factors is now available for informed decision-making.
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.