UCLA

Objectives To profile the clinical presentation and treatment results of esthesioneuroblastomas at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), from 2002 to 2013. Design Retrospective review. Setting Tertiary academic institution. Participants Forty-one patients with esthesioneuroblastomas treated at UCLA. Main Outcome Measures Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Results Thirty-six patients were included with a mean age of 50.1 years and a median duration of follow-up of 33 months. The 5-year RFS and OS were 54% and 82%, respectively. Modified Kadish stage was the only factor identified to affect OS. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that tumor grade was the only factor that had an independent impact on RFS. There was no statistical difference in survival among the surgical approaches chosen. Conclusions The updated data on the UCLA experience reveals that all three surgical approaches chosen provide comparable survival, although longer follow-up will be needed to ascertain if these findings hold true. The endoscopic approach had a statistically significant decrease in length of hospital stay and a trend toward reduced blood loss, intensive care unit admission, and complications. The modified Kadish staging was the only factor identified to predict OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor grade was an independent predictor of recurrence; therefore, its importance should be emphasized in future staging systems.