Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Ideology, Incidence and the Political Economy of Fuel Taxes: Evidence from California 2018 Proposition 6

Published Web Location

https://doi.org/10.7922/G2445JVN
The data associated with this publication are available at:
https://doi.org/10.3886/E198176V1
Abstract

In 2018, California voters rejected Proposition 6, a ballot initiative that sought to repeal state gasoline taxes and vehicle fees enacted as part of the 2017 Road Repair and Accountability Act. This paper examines the relationship between support for the proposition, political ideology and the economic burdens imposed by the Act. For every hundred dollars of annual per-household costs imposed by the Road Repair and Accountability Act, support for proposition rose by 3–5 percentage points, roughly comparable to a commensurate increase in the share of ”liberal” voters. Notably, the relationship between voting and the economic burden of the policy is seven times strong in the most conservative tracts relative to the most liberal tracts. This heterogeneity has important implications for the popular support for environmental taxes, as conservative areas in California and elsewhere tend to bear a higher burden from transportation and energy taxes than liberal areas.

View the NCST Project Webpage

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View