Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Criterion validity of self-reports of alcohol, cannabis, and methamphetamine use among young men in Cape Town, South Africa.

  • Author(s): Arfer, Kodi B
  • Tomlinson, Mark
  • Mayekiso, Andile
  • Bantjes, Jason
  • van Heerden, Alastair
  • Rotheram-Borus, Mary Jane
  • et al.

Published Web Location

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-017-9769-4
No data is associated with this publication.
Abstract

Valid measurement of substance use is necessary to evaluate preventive and treatment interventions. Self-report is fast and inexpensive, but its accuracy can be hampered by social desirability bias and imperfect recall. We examined the agreement between self-report of recent use and rapid diagnostic tests for three substances (alcohol, cannabis, and methamphetamine) among 904 young men living in Cape Town, South Africa. Rapid diagnostic tests detected the respective substances in 32%, 52%, and 22% of men. Among those who tested positive, 61% (95% CI [56%, 66%]), 70% ([67%, 74%]), and 48% ([42%, 54%]) admitted use. Men were moderately more willing to admit use of cannabis than alcohol (log OR 0.42) or admit use of alcohol than methamphetamine (log OR 0.53). Our findings show that self-report has reasonable criterion validity in this population, but criterion validity can vary substantially depending on the substance.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Item not freely available? Link broken?
Report a problem accessing this item