Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UC Irvine

UC Irvine Previously Published Works bannerUC Irvine

Understanding the Composition of a Comprehensive Otolaryngologists Practice Through Medicare Reimbursements.

Published Web Location

https://doi.org/10.1002/ohn.1071Creative Commons 'BY-NC-ND' version 4.0 license
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: With a rising number of otolaryngology (ORL) graduates completing a fellowship, the number of generalists (also known as comprehensive ORLs [c-ORLs]), arguably the group of ORLs most needed, is likely to decrease. However, the practice and reimbursement patterns of c-ORLs have yet to be examined. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional retrospective analysis. SETTING: 2019 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Datasets. METHODS: All ORLs were isolated (n = 8959), and then a random 10% sample was obtained. These 897 ORLs were queried for fellowship completion, isolating out those who have not completed a fellowship, and characterizing their practice patterns with regards to Medicare, the largest insurer in the US. RESULTS: Within the random sample, 554 (61.8%) were c-ORLs, of which 47 (8.5%) practiced in an academic setting. c-ORLs billed a mean of 52.9 (SD: 26.6) Current Procedural Terminology (CPT), and community-based c-ORLs had a more diverse practice (P < .001). On average, Medicare paid $138,942 ($117,563) to each c-ORL for 1982.2 (2614.7) services for 451.7 (296.9) patients. Ninety-five percent of their total reimbursements were office-based. Of 250 unique CPT codes billed, 52.8% of all c-ORLs reimbursements were from evaluation and management services, 17.8% from rhinology, 9.7% from otology/neurotology, and 9% from laryngology. CONCLUSION: Though surgery is an integral aspect of all ORLs training and practice, c-ORLs practice in a largely office-based setting, at least with regard to Medicare patients. While c-ORLs clearly practice with a diverse skill set, their reimbursement patterns suggest rhinology makes up the largest proportion of their procedural practice.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.