Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Timing of dialysis initiation in transplant-naive and failed transplant patients.

  • Author(s): Molnar, Miklos Z
  • Ojo, Akinlolu O
  • Bunnapradist, Suphamai
  • Kovesdy, Csaba P
  • Kalantar-Zadeh, Kamyar
  • et al.
Abstract

Over the past two decades, most guidelines have advocated early initiation of dialysis on the basis of studies showing improved survival in patients starting dialysis early. These recommendations led to an increase in the proportion of patients initiating dialysis with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >10 ml/min/1.73 m(2), from 20% in 1996 to 52% in 2008. During this period, the percentage of patients starting dialysis with an eGFR ≥15 ml/min/1.73 m(2) increased from 4% to 17%. However, recent studies have failed to substantiate a benefit of early dialysis initiation and some data have suggested worse outcomes for patients starting dialysis with a higher eGFR. Several reasons for this seemingly paradoxical observation have been suggested, including the fact that patients requiring early dialysis are likely to have more severe symptoms and comorbidities, leading to confounding by indication, as well as biological mechanisms that causally relate early dialysis therapy to adverse outcomes. Patients with a failing renal allograft who reinitiate dialysis encounter similar problems. However, unique factors associated with a failed allograft means that the optimal timing of dialysis initiation in failed transplant patients might differ from that in transplant-naive patients with chronic kidney disease. In this Review, we discuss studies of dialysis initiation and compare risks and benefits of early versus late initiation and reinitiation of dialysis therapy.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Main Content
Current View