Flipping the Classroom in Medical Student Education: Does Priming Work?
- Author(s): Rose, Emily;
- Jhun, Paul;
- Baluzy, Matthew;
- Hauck, Aaron;
- Huang, Jonathan;
- Wagner, Jonathan;
- Kearl, Y. Liza;
- Behar, Solomon;
- Claudius, Ilene
- et al.
Published Web Locationhttps://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2017.8.35162
Introduction: The emergency medicine clerkship curriculum at Los Angeles County + University of Southern California Medical Center includes monthly lectures on pediatric fever and shortness of breath (SOB). This educational innovation evaluated if learning could be enhanced by “priming” the students with educational online videos prior to an in-class session. Factors that impacted completion rates were also evaluated (planned specialty and time given for video viewing).
Methods: Twenty minute videos were to be viewed prior to the didactic session. Students were assigned to either the fever or SOB group and received links to those respective videos. All participating students took a pre-test prior to viewing the online lectures. For analysis, test scores were placed into concordant groups (test results on fever questions in the group assigned the fever video and test results on SOB questions in the group assigned the SOB video) and discordant groups (crossover between video assigned and topic tested). Each subject contributed one set of concordant results and one set of discordant results. Descriptive statistics were performed with the Mann-Whitney U test. Lecture links were distributed to students two weeks prior to the in-class session for 7 months and three days prior to the in-class session for 8 months (in which both groups included both EM-bound and non-EM bound students).
Results: In the 15 months study period, 64% of students rotating through the EM elective prepared for the in class session by watching the videos. During 10 months where exclusively EM-bound students were rotating (n=144), 71.5% of students viewed the lectures. In 4 months where students were not EM-bound (n=54), 55.6% of students viewed the lectures (p=0.033). Participation was 60.2% when lecture links were given three days in advance and 68.7% when links were given two weeks in advance (p=0.197). In the analysis of concordant scores, the pre-test averaged 56.7% correct, the immediate post-test averaged 78.1% correct, and the delayed post-test was 67.2%. In the discordant groups, the pretest averaged 51.9%, the immediate posttest was 67.1% and the delayed by 68.8%. In the concordant groups, the immediate post-test scores improved by 21.4%, compared with 15.2% in the discordant groups (p = 0.655). In the delayed post-test the concordant scores improved by 10.5% and discordant scores by 16.9 percent (p=0.609). Sixty-two percent of students surveyed preferred the format of online videos with in-class case discussion to a traditional lecture format.
Conclusion: Immediate post-tests and delayed post-tests improved but priming was not demonstrated to be a statistically superior educational method in this study. Medical student completion of the preparatory materials for the emergency medicine rotation session increased when the students were emergency medicine-bound. Participation rates were not significantly different when given at 2 weeks versus 3 days.