UC San Diego

Opinion statement

Initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART) in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) elite controllers remains controversial, because current evidence does not definitively demonstrate that the benefits of ART outweigh risk in this patient population. However, it is the opinion of the authors that in developed countries, where first-line ART regimens have minimal toxicities, treatment of elite controllers should be strongly considered. Treatment of elite controllers has the potential to minimize the size of the HIV reservoir, which benefits elite controllers who choose to pursue future cure, dampen immune activation, diminish risk of transmission, and encourage linkage and engagement in care allowing HIV providers the opportunity to address HIV-associated non-AIDS conditions and other co-morbidities.

Purpose of review

This review aims to summarize literature relevant to the management of elite controllers for clinicians caring for patients living with HIV. Key topics include timing of antiretroviral therapy (ART) and ART in the unique populations of elite controllers with concomitant cardiovascular disease and hepatitis C co-infection, and undergoing immunosuppressive therapy for other co-morbidities.

Recent findings

The persistent HIV reservoir in elite controllers has two main implications. First, increased immune activation appears to adversely impact clinical outcomes in elite controllers, but the role of ART in addressing this effect remains unclear. Second, elite control duration can be limited, but certain factors may help to predict disease progression with implications on timing of ART.

Summary

Initiation of ART during elite control remains controversial, although there are multiple theoretical benefits. Elite controllers comprise a heterogeneous population of patients living with HIV, and optimal management involves weighing the risk and benefit of ART as well as monitoring of clinical consequences of increased immune activation.