UC San Diego

Background

The endovascular repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) can be performed with a wide variety of devices. Many of these grafts elevate the aortic bifurcation which can limit future repairs if the graft material fails thereby creating a type III endoleak to aorto-uniliac (AUI) grafts. Many manufacturers have grafts susceptible to this, but we have seen this in the Medtronic AneuRx graft. Our goal is to provide technical details and outcomes regarding a novel technique to re-line these grafts while maintaining inline flow to the iliac arteries.

Methods

This was a single institution review of patients who had endoleaks requiring intervention after a previously placed graft with an elevated aortic bifurcation. Primary outcomes included technical success defined as placement of all planned devices, resolution of type III endoleak, aneurysm size at follow-up, and requirement of reintervention. Secondary outcomes included 30-day complications, aneurysm-related mortality (ARM), and all-cause mortality (ACM). Technical details of the operation include back table deployment of an Ovation device, modification of the deployment system tether and preemptive placement of an up and over 0.014" wire. The wire is placed up and over and hung outside the contralateral gate. Once the main body is introduced above the old graft, the 0.014" is snared from the contralateral side and externalized. The main body is then able to be seated at the bifurcation as the limb is not fully deployed and then device deployment is completed per IFU.

Results

Our study consists of four individuals, three of which had an AAA initially managed with an AneuRx EVAR and one with a combination of Gore and Cook grafts. All four patients were male with an average age of 84.5 years at time of re-line. All patients had at least 10 years between initial surgery and re-line at our institution. Primary outcomes revealed no type 1 or 3 endoleaks at follow-up, technical success was 100% and one patient required reintervention for aneurysm growth and type 2 endoleak. In terms of our secondary outcomes, there was one postoperative complication which was cardiac dysfunction secondary to demand ischemia, ARM was 0% and ACM was 25% at average follow up of 2.44 years.

Conclusion

As individuals continue to age, there are more patients who would benefit from less invasive reinterventions following EVAR. Whether this is due to aortic degeneration, stent migration, or stent material damage is not always known. In this study we present an endovascular approach to treating type III endoleak patients with a previous graft and elevated aortic bifurcation using Ovation stent grafts and found no evidence of type 1 or 3 endoleaks on follow-up imaging. This approach may allow patients with type III endoleak the option of a minimally invasive, percutaneous approach where they previously would not have had one.