UCLA

We report on results from triaxial drained monotonic and cyclic compression tests for four different aggregates (gabbro, limestone, demolished concrete, steel slag), and discuss the applicability of UBCSAND model for simulating the relevant non-linear stress-strain curves. First, UBCSAND is integrated analytically for the elastic and plastic volumetric and deviatoric strains, leading to a pair of novel closed-form solutions expressed in terms of hypergeometric functions. These solutions are inherently free of numerical errors and can be used for the evaluation of results from numerical integration. Second, three calibration techniques for the model parameters are presented and compared: (1) a graphical “chart” solution based on results from forward numerical simulations; (2) a numerical approach based on minimization of residuals; and (3) an informed trial-and-error approach based on the analytical solution. Errors in numerical integration of the model are explored by comparing the analytical solution against results from an Euler integration. Variations in the calibrated parameters are discussed for drained monotonic and cyclic triaxial loading considering different types of aggregates.