Reassessing global change research priorities in mediterranean terrestrial ecosystems: how far have we come and where do we go from here?
- Doblas‐Miranda, E;
- Martínez‐Vilalta, J;
- Lloret, F;
- Álvarez, A;
- Ávila, A;
- Bonet, FJ;
- Brotons, L;
- Castro, J;
- Yuste, J Curiel;
- Díaz, M;
- Ferrandis, P;
- García‐Hurtado, E;
- Iriondo, JM;
- Keenan, TF;
- Latron, J;
- Llusià, J;
- Loepfe, L;
- Mayol, M;
- Moré, G;
- Moya, D;
- Peñuelas, J;
- Pons, X;
- Poyatos, R;
- Sardans, J;
- Sus, O;
- Vallejo, VR;
- Vayreda, J;
- Retana, J
- et al.
Published Web Location
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/geb.12224Abstract
Aim: Mediterranean terrestrial ecosystems serve as reference laboratories for the investigation of global change because of their transitional climate, the high spatiotemporal variability of their environmental conditions, a rich and unique biodiversity and a wide range of socio-economic conditions. As scientific development and environmental pressures increase, it is increasingly necessary to evaluate recent progress and to challenge research priorities in the face of global change. Location: Mediterranean terrestrial ecosystems. Methods: This article revisits the research priorities proposed in a 1998 assessment. Results: A new set of research priorities is proposed: (1) to establish the role of the landscape mosaic on fire-spread; (2) to further research the combined effect of different drivers on pest expansion; (3) to address the interaction between drivers of global change and recent forest management practices; (4) to obtain more realistic information on the impacts of global change and ecosystem services; (5) to assess forest mortality events associated with climatic extremes; (6) to focus global change research on identifying and managing vulnerable areas; (7) to use the functional traits concept to study resilience after disturbance; (8) to study the relationship between genotypic and phenotypic diversity as a source of forest resilience; (9) to understand the balance between C storage and water resources; (10) to analyse the interplay between landscape-scale processes and biodiversity conservation; (11) to refine models by including interactions between drivers and socio-economic contexts; (12) to understand forest-atmosphere feedbacks; (13) to represent key mechanisms linking plant hydraulics with landscape hydrology. Main conclusions: (1) The interactive nature of different global change drivers remains poorly understood. (2) There is a critical need for the rapid development of regional- and global-scale models that are more tightly connected with large-scale experiments, data networks and management practice. (3) More attention should be directed to drought-related forest decline and the current relevance of historical land use.
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.