Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Do as I explain: Explanations communicate optimal interventions

Creative Commons 'BY' version 4.0 license
Abstract

People often select only a few events when explaining what happened. What drives people's explanation selection? Prior research argued that people's explanation choices are affected by event normality and causal structure. Here, we propose a new model of these existing findings and test its predictions in a novel experiment. The model predicts that speakers value accuracy and relevance. They choose explanations that are true, and that communicate useful information to the listener. We test the model's predictions empirically by manipulating what goals a listener has and what actions they can take. Across twelve experimental conditions, we find that our model accurately predicts that people like to choose explanations that communicate optimal interventions

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View