Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UCLA

UCLA Previously Published Works bannerUCLA

Diabetes care quality in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System and commercial managed care: the TRIAD study.

  • Author(s): Kerr, Eve A;
  • Gerzoff, Robert B;
  • Krein, Sarah L;
  • Selby, Joseph V;
  • Piette, John D;
  • Curb, J David;
  • Herman, William H;
  • Marrero, David G;
  • Narayan, KM Venkat;
  • Safford, Monika M;
  • Thompson, Theodore;
  • Mangione, Carol M
  • et al.
Abstract

Background

No studies have compared care in the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) with that delivered in commercial managed care organizations, nor have studies focused in depth on care comparisons for chronic, outpatient conditions.

Objective

To compare the quality of diabetes care between patients in the VA system and those enrolled in commercial managed care organizations by using equivalent sampling and measurement methods.

Design

Cross-sectional patient survey with retrospective review of medical records.

Setting

5 VA medical centers and 8 commercial managed care organizations in 5 matched geographic regions.

Participants

8205 diabetic patients: 1285 in the VA system and 6920 in commercial managed care.

Measurements

We compared scores on identically specified quality measures for 7 diabetes care processes and 3 diabetes intermediate outcomes and on 4 dimensions of satisfaction. Scores were expressed as the percentage of patients receiving indicated care and were adjusted for patients' demographic and health characteristics.

Results

Patients in the VA system had better scores than patients in commercial managed care on all process measures (for example, 93% vs. 83% for annual hemoglobin A1c; P = 0.006; 91% vs. 75% for annual eye examination; P < 0.001). Blood pressure control was poor in both groups (52% to 53% of persons had blood pressure < 140/90 mm Hg), but patients in the VA system had better control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and hemoglobin A1c (for example, 86% vs. 72% for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level < 3.37 mmol/L [<130 mg/dL]; P = 0.002). Satisfaction was similar in the 2 groups.

Limitations

Our results may not be generalizable to all regions or health plans, and some of the differences in performance could reflect differences in documentation.

Conclusions

Diabetes processes of care and 2 of 3 intermediate outcomes were better for patients in the VA system than for patients in commercial managed care. However, both VA and commercial managed care had room for improvement, especially for blood pressure control.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View