- Main
ACR Appropriateness Criteria® on Metastatic Bone Disease
- Roberts, Catherine C;
- Daffner, Richard H;
- Weissman, Barbara N;
- Bancroft, Laura;
- Bennett, D Lee;
- Blebea, Judy S;
- Bruno, Michael A;
- Fries, Ian Blair;
- Germano, Isabelle M;
- Holly, Langston;
- Jacobson, Jon A;
- Luchs, Jonathan S;
- Morrison, William B;
- Olson, Jeffrey J;
- Payne, William K;
- Resnik, Charles S;
- Schweitzer, Mark E;
- Seeger, Leanne L;
- Taljanovic, Mihra;
- Wise, James N;
- Lutz, Stephen T
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2010.02.015Abstract
Appropriate imaging modalities for screening, staging, and surveillance of patients with suspected and documented metastatic disease to bone include (99m)Tc bone scanning, MRI, CT, radiography, and 2-[(18)F]fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-PET. Clinical scenarios reviewed include asymptomatic stage 1 breast carcinoma, symptomatic stage 2 breast carcinoma, abnormal bone scan results with breast carcinoma, pathologic fracture with known metastatic breast carcinoma, asymptomatic well-differentiated and poorly differentiated prostate carcinoma, vertebral fracture with history of malignancy, non-small-cell lung carcinoma staging, symptomatic multiple myeloma, osteosarcoma staging and surveillance, and suspected bone metastasis in a pregnant patient. No single imaging modality is consistently best for the assessment of metastatic bone disease across all tumor types and clinical situations. In some cases, no imaging is indicated. The recommendations contained herein are the result of evidence-based consensus by the ACR Appropriateness Criteria((R)) Expert Panel on Musculoskeletal Radiology.
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-