Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
Neratinib + capecitabine sustains health-related quality of life in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer and ≥ 2 prior HER2-directed regimens
- Moy, Beverly;
- Oliveira, Mafalda;
- Saura, Cristina;
- Gradishar, William;
- Kim, Sung-Bae;
- Brufsky, Adam;
- Hurvitz, Sara A;
- Ryvo, Larisa;
- Fagnani, Daniele;
- Kalmadi, Sujith;
- Silverman, Paula;
- Delaloge, Suzette;
- Alarcon, Jesus;
- Kwong, Ava;
- Lee, Keun Seok;
- Ang, Peter Cher Siang;
- Ow, Samuel Guan Wei;
- Chu, Sung-Chao;
- Bryce, Richard;
- Keyvanjah, Kiana;
- Bebchuk, Judith;
- Zhang, Bo;
- Oestreicher, Nina;
- Bose, Ron;
- Chan, Nancy
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-021-06217-4Abstract
Purpose
To characterize health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) from the NALA phase 3 study.Methods
In NALA (NCT01808573), patients were randomized 1:1 to neratinib + capecitabine (N + C) or lapatinib + capecitabine (L + C). HRQoL was assessed using seven prespecified scores from the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality Of Life Questionnaire core module (QLQ-C30) and breast cancer-specific questionnaire (QLQ-BR23) at baseline and every 6 weeks. Descriptive statistics summarized scores over time, mixed models evaluated differences between treatment arms, and Kaplan-Meier methods were used to assess time to deterioration in HRQoL scores of ≥ 10 points.Results
Of the 621 patients randomized in NALA, patients were included in the HRQoL analysis if they completed baseline and at least one follow-up questionnaire. The summary, global health status, physical functioning, fatigue, constipation, and systemic therapy side effects scores were stable over time with no persistent differences between treatment groups. There were no differences in time to deterioration (TTD) for the QLQ-C30 summary score between treatment arms; the hazard ratio (HR) for N + C vs. L + C was 0.94 (95% CI 0.63-1.40). Only the diarrhea score worsened significantly more in the N + C arm as compared to the L + C arm, and this remained over time (HR for TTD for N + C vs. L + C was 1.71 [95% CI 1.32-2.23]).Conclusion
In NALA, patients treated with N + C maintained their global HRQoL over time, despite a worsening of the diarrhea-related scores. These results may help guide optimal treatment selection for HER2-positive MBC.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%