Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
Caring for Critically Ill Patients with the ABCDEF Bundle
- Pun, Brenda T;
- Balas, Michele C;
- Barnes-Daly, Mary Ann;
- Thompson, Jennifer L;
- Aldrich, J Matthew;
- Barr, Juliana;
- Byrum, Diane;
- Carson, Shannon S;
- Devlin, John W;
- Engel, Heidi J;
- Esbrook, Cheryl L;
- Hargett, Ken D;
- Harmon, Lori;
- Hielsberg, Christina;
- Jackson, James C;
- Kelly, Tamra L;
- Kumar, Vishakha;
- Millner, Lawson;
- Morse, Alexandra;
- Perme, Christiane S;
- Posa, Patricia J;
- Puntillo, Kathleen A;
- Schweickert, William D;
- Stollings, Joanna L;
- Tan, Alai;
- D'Agostino McGowan, Lucy;
- Ely, E Wesley
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1097/ccm.0000000000003482Abstract
Objective
Decades-old, common ICU practices including deep sedation, immobilization, and limited family access are being challenged. We endeavoured to evaluate the relationship between ABCDEF bundle performance and patient-centered outcomes in critical care.Design
Prospective, multicenter, cohort study from a national quality improvement collaborative.Setting
68 academic, community, and federal ICUs collected data during a 20-month period.Patients
15,226 adults with at least one ICU day.Interventions
We defined ABCDEF bundle performance (our main exposure) in two ways: 1) complete performance (patient received every eligible bundle element on any given day) and 2) proportional performance (percentage of eligible bundle elements performed on any given day). We explored the association between complete and proportional ABCDEF bundle performance and three sets of outcomes: patient-related (mortality, ICU and hospital discharge), symptom-related (mechanical ventilation, coma, delirium, pain, restraint use), and system-related (ICU readmission, discharge destination). All models were adjusted for a minimum of 18 a priori determined potential confounders.Measurements and results
Complete ABCDEF bundle performance was associated with lower likelihood of seven outcomes: hospital death within 7 days (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.32; CI, 0.17-0.62), next-day mechanical ventilation (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.28; CI, 0.22-0.36), coma (AOR, 0.35; CI, 0.22-0.56), delirium (AOR, 0.60; CI, 0.49-0.72), physical restraint use (AOR, 0.37; CI, 0.30-0.46), ICU readmission (AOR, 0.54; CI, 0.37-0.79), and discharge to a facility other than home (AOR, 0.64; CI, 0.51-0.80). There was a consistent dose-response relationship between higher proportional bundle performance and improvements in each of the above-mentioned clinical outcomes (all p < 0.002). Significant pain was more frequently reported as bundle performance proportionally increased (p = 0.0001).Conclusions
ABCDEF bundle performance showed significant and clinically meaningful improvements in outcomes including survival, mechanical ventilation use, coma, delirium, restraint-free care, ICU readmissions, and post-ICU discharge disposition.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%