Skip to main content
Corrigendum to “Beyond Sedlis—A novel histology-specific nomogram for predicting cervical cancer recurrence risk: An NRG/GOG ancillary analysis” [Gynecologic Oncology 162 (2021) 532–538]
Abstract
The authors regret that the version of Table 3 originally published in this article was incorrect. The online version has now been updated and the correct table can be found below. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. Table 3. Comparison of 3 yr RFS, nomogram recurrence risk, and Sedlis criteria for predictor variable combinations. [Table Presented]
Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.