Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Estimation of allele frequency and association mapping using next-generation sequencing data

  • Author(s): Kim, Su
  • Lohmueller, Kirk E
  • Albrechtsen, Anders
  • Li, Yingrui
  • Korneliussen, Thorfinn
  • Tian, Geng
  • Grarup, Niels
  • Jiang, Tao
  • Andersen, Gitte
  • Witte, Daniel
  • Jorgensen, Torben
  • Hansen, Torben
  • Pedersen, Oluf
  • Wang, Jun
  • Nielsen, Rasmus
  • et al.
Abstract

Abstract Background Estimation of allele frequency is of fundamental importance in population genetic analyses and in association mapping. In most studies using next-generation sequencing, a cost effective approach is to use medium or low-coverage data (e.g., < 15X). However, SNP calling and allele frequency estimation in such studies is associated with substantial statistical uncertainty because of varying coverage and high error rates. Results We evaluate a new maximum likelihood method for estimating allele frequencies in low and medium coverage next-generation sequencing data. The method is based on integrating over uncertainty in the data for each individual rather than first calling genotypes. This method can be applied to directly test for associations in case/control studies. We use simulations to compare the likelihood method to methods based on genotype calling, and show that the likelihood method outperforms the genotype calling methods in terms of: (1) accuracy of allele frequency estimation, (2) accuracy of the estimation of the distribution of allele frequencies across neutrally evolving sites, and (3) statistical power in association mapping studies. Using real re-sequencing data from 200 individuals obtained from an exon-capture experiment, we show that the patterns observed in the simulations are also found in real data. Conclusions Overall, our results suggest that association mapping and estimation of allele frequencies should not be based on genotype calling in low to medium coverage data. Furthermore, if genotype calling methods are used, it is usually better not to filter genotypes based on the call confidence score.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC Academic Senate's Open Access Policy. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Main Content
Current View