Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UCLA Entertainment Law Review

UCLA Entertainment Law Review bannerUCLA

NFTs and the Art World – What's Real, and What's Not

Abstract

This Article explores the reality and mythology of NFTs in art law and in the art world by unpacking six myths, misconceptions, and poorly understood truths about NFTs that prevent persons, and particularly art law lawyers, from understanding the role NFTs are playing and could play in the art world and beyond. The Article discusses the legal and financial attributes and potentialities of NFTs for artists, galleries, dealers, investors, museums, and, most especially, for lawyers who advise the players in the art world. The six myths or misconceptions are:

-Myth 1: NFTs are artworks.

-Myth 2: NFTs create a false artificial scarcity in artworks.

-Myth 3: The valuation of NFTs is unlike any rational process of valuation for any other artwork or asset.

-Myth 4: Smart Contracts are like regular contracts.

-Myth 5: NFTs have created the ability of artists to receive resale royalty rights.

-Myth 6: NFTs will allow all artists the chance to make serious money from their art.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View