Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
A multi-institutional study to investigate the sparing effect after whole brain electron FLASH in mice: Reproducibility and temporal evolution of functional, electrophysiological, and neurogenic endpoints
- Drayson, Olivia GG;
- Melemenidis, Stavros;
- Katila, Nikita;
- Viswanathan, Vignesh;
- Kramár, Enikö A;
- Zhang, Richard;
- Kim, Rachel;
- Ru, Ning;
- Petit, Benoit;
- Dutt, Suparna;
- Manjappa, Rakesh;
- Ashraf, M Ramish;
- Lau, Brianna;
- Soto, Luis;
- Skinner, Lawrie;
- Yu, Amu S;
- Surucu, Murat;
- Maxim, Peter G;
- Zebadua-Ballasteros, Paola;
- Wood, Marcelo A;
- Montay-Gruel, Pierre;
- Baulch, Janet E;
- Vozenin, Marie-Catherine;
- Loo, Billy W;
- Limoli, Charles L
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2024.110534Abstract
Background and purpose
Ultra-high dose-rate radiotherapy (FLASH) has been shown to mitigate normal tissue toxicities associated with conventional dose rate radiotherapy (CONV) without compromising tumor killing in preclinical models. A prominent challenge in preclinical radiation research, including FLASH, is validating both the physical dosimetry and the biological effects across multiple institutions.Materials and methods
We previously demonstrated dosimetric reproducibility of two different electron FLASH devices at separate institutions using standardized phantoms and dosimeters. In this study, tumor-free adult female mice were given 10 Gy whole brain FLASH and CONV irradiation at both institutions and evaluated for the reproducibility and temporal evolution of multiple neurobiological endpoints.Results
FLASH sparing of behavioral performance on novel object recognition (4 months post-irradiation) and of electrophysiologic long-term potentiation (LTP, 5 months post-irradiation) was reproduced between institutions. Differences between FLASH and CONV on the endpoints of hippocampal neurogenesis (Sox2, doublecortin), neuroinflammation (microglial activation), and electrophysiology (LTP) were not observed at early times (48 h to 2 weeks), but recovery of immature neurons by 3 weeks was greater with FLASH.Conclusion
In summary, we demonstrated reproducible FLASH sparing effects on the brain between two different beams at two different institutions with validated dosimetry. FLASH sparing effects on the endpoints evaluated manifested at later but not the earliest time points.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%