Skip to main content
Download PDF
- Main
Association of Traditional Cardiovascular Risk Factors With Venous Thromboembolism
- Mahmoodi, Bakhtawar K;
- Cushman, Mary;
- Anne Næss, Inger;
- Allison, Matthew A;
- Bos, Willem J;
- Brækkan, Sigrid K;
- Cannegieter, Suzanne C;
- Gansevoort, Ron T;
- Gona, Philimon N;
- Hammerstrøm, Jens;
- Hansen, John-Bjarne;
- Heckbert, Susan;
- Holst, Anders G;
- Lakoski, Susan G;
- Lutsey, Pamela L;
- Manson, JoAnn E;
- Martin, Lisa W;
- Matsushita, Kunihiro;
- Meijer, Karina;
- Overvad, Kim;
- Prescott, Eva;
- Puurunen, Marja;
- Rossouw, Jacques E;
- Sang, Yingying;
- Severinsen, Marianne T;
- Ten Berg, Jur;
- Folsom, Aaron R;
- Zakai, Neil A
- et al.
Published Web Location
https://doi.org/10.1161/circulationaha.116.024507Abstract
Background
Much controversy surrounds the association of traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors with venous thromboembolism (VTE).Methods
We performed an individual level random-effect meta-analysis including 9 prospective studies with measured baseline cardiovascular disease risk factors and validated VTE events. Definitions were harmonized across studies. Traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors were modeled categorically and continuously using restricted cubic splines. Estimates were obtained for overall VTE, provoked VTE (ie, VTE occurring in the presence of 1 or more established VTE risk factors), and unprovoked VTE, pulmonary embolism, and deep-vein thrombosis.Results
The studies included 244 865 participants with 4910 VTE events occurring during a mean follow-up of 4.7 to 19.7 years per study. Age, sex, and body mass index-adjusted hazard ratios for overall VTE were 0.98 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.89-1.07) for hypertension, 0.97 (95% CI: 0.88-1.08) for hyperlipidemia, 1.01 (95% CI: 0.89-1.15) for diabetes mellitus, and 1.19 (95% CI: 1.08-1.32) for current smoking. After full adjustment, these estimates were numerically similar. When modeled continuously, an inverse association was observed for systolic blood pressure (hazard ratio=0.79 [95% CI: 0.68-0.92] at systolic blood pressure 160 vs 110 mm Hg) but not for diastolic blood pressure or lipid measures with VTE. An important finding from VTE subtype analyses was that cigarette smoking was associated with provoked but not unprovoked VTE. Fully adjusted hazard ratios for the associations of current smoking with provoked and unprovoked VTE were 1.36 (95% CI: 1.22-1.52) and 1.08 (95% CI: 0.90-1.29), respectively.Conclusions
Except for the association between cigarette smoking and provoked VTE, which is potentially mediated through comorbid conditions such as cancer, the modifiable traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors are not associated with increased VTE risk. Higher systolic blood pressure showed an inverse association with VTE.Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.
Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
File name:
-
File size:
-
Title:
-
Author:
-
Subject:
-
Keywords:
-
Creation Date:
-
Modification Date:
-
Creator:
-
PDF Producer:
-
PDF Version:
-
Page Count:
-
Page Size:
-
Fast Web View:
-
Preparing document for printing…
0%