Skip to main content
Plaque Removal and Gingival Health after Use of a Novel Dental Gel: A Clinical Study.
- Author(s): Nayudu, Anuradha;
- Lam, Tracie;
- Ho, Jessica;
- Forghany, Ali;
- Vu, Thinh;
- Ngo, William;
- Ajdaharian, Janet;
- Wilder-Smith, Petra
- et al.
Published Web Locationhttps://doi.org/10.4172/2161-1122.1000396
BackgroundGoal of this in vivo prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blinded, cross over study was to compare the level of plaque control and gingivitis after use of a novel dental gel (test) vs. A Triclosan/copolymer dentifrice (control).
MethodsAfter coronal polishing, 22 subjects with moderate gingivitis were randomly assigned to brush twice daily with test or control dentifrice for the first study Arm. Plaque, gingival and sulcus bleeding indices were recorded at baseline, week 2 and week 4. Professional coronal polishing was repeated, and then subjects brushed with the second dentifrice for 4 weeks. Clinical indices were again recorded at Baseline, week 2 and week 4. The effects of each dentifrice on clinical indices were compared using Student's t-test.
ResultsBrushing with the test gel produced significantly greater levels of plaque reduction versus the Triclosan/copolymer control dentifrice at each time point. 45% less plaque was measured after 4 weeks of test agent use than after control agent use (p<0.000000005). A significant reduction in gingival inflammation from test vs control agent over w weeks was also observed (p=0.000342).
ConclusionsAn activated edathamil dental gel formulation provides effective plaque control and reduced gingival inflammation compared to a Triclosan/Co-polymer dental gel. Practical Implications: A novel dental gel formulation that does not contain abrasives, detergents or antimicrobials may provide effective plaque control and support gingival health.
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.