Automated simulation of areal bone mineral density assessment in the distal radius from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography
Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Automated simulation of areal bone mineral density assessment in the distal radius from high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography

  • Author(s): Burghardt, A. J.
  • Kazakia, G. J.
  • Link, T. M.
  • Majumdar, S.
  • et al.
Abstract

An automated image processing method is presented for simulating areal bone mineral density measures using high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in the ultra-distal radius. The accuracy of the method is validated against clinical dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). This technique represents a useful reference to gauge the utility of novel 3D quantification methods applied to HR-pQCT in multi-center clinical studies and potentially negates the need for separate forearm DXA measurements. Osteoporotic status is primarily assessed by measuring areal bone mineral density (aBMD) using 2D dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). However, this technique does not sufficiently explain bone strength and fracture risk. High-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) has been introduced as a method to quantify 3D bone microstructure and biomechanics. In this study, an automated method is proposed to simulate aBMD measures from HR-pQCT distal radius images. A total of 117 subject scans were retrospectively analyzed from two clinical bone quality studies. The distal radius was imaged by HR-pQCT and DXA on one of two devices (Hologic or Lunar). Areal BMD was calculated by simulation from HR-pQCT images (aBMDsim) and by standard DXA analysis (aBMDdxa). The reproducibility of the simulation technique was 1.1% (root mean-squared coefficient of variation). HR-pQCT-based aBMDsim correlated strongly to aBMDdxa (Hologic: R 2 = 0.82, Lunar: R 2 = 0.87), though aBMDsim underestimated aBMDdxa for both DXA devices (p < 0.0001). Finally, aBMDsim predicted aBMD at the proximal femur and lumbar spine with equal power compared to aBMDdxa. The results demonstrate that aBMD can be simulated from HR-pQCT images of the distal radius. This approach has the potential to serve as a surrogate forearm aBMD measure for clinical HR-pQCT studies when axial bone mineral density values are not required.

Main Content
Current View