Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

UC San Diego

UC San Diego Previously Published Works bannerUC San Diego

Attrition of Patients on a Precision Oncology Trial: Analysis of the I‐PREDICT Experience

Abstract

Background

Precision oncology uses molecular profiling of tumors to identify biomarker-tailored therapies for patients in the hope of improving outcomes. Typically, only a minority of patients receives evaluable matched treatment. This study explored the reasons for attrition on a precision medicine trial.

Materials and methods

Study participants were 190 adult patients who consented to the I-PREDICT (Investigation of molecular Profile-Related Evidence Determining Individualized Cancer Therapy) trial. Patients had metastatic and/or unresectable incurable malignancies. Patients who were not evaluable were analyzed.

Results

Of consented patients, 44% were not evaluable. Men were twice as likely to be not evaluable as women. Prominently, 45% of patients who were not evaluable dropped off because of death, hospice referral, or decline in organ function.

Conclusion

Health deterioration of consented patients is a significant barrier to being evaluable on the I-PREDICT trial. These data suggest that patients are enrolled on precision oncology trials too late in their disease course or with excessive disease burden.

Many UC-authored scholarly publications are freely available on this site because of the UC's open access policies. Let us know how this access is important for you.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View