- Main
In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Optics and Performance of a Distal Sensor Ureteroscope Versus a Standard Fiberoptic Ureteroscope
Published Web Location
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3826566/pdf/end.2013.0003.pdfAbstract
AbstractBackground and Purpose
Recent advances in distal sensor technologies have made distal sensor ureteroscopes both commercially and technically feasible. We evaluated performance characteristics and optics of a new generation distal sensor Flex-XC (XC) and a standard flexible fiberoptic ureteroscope Flex-X2 (X2), both from Karl Storz, Tuttlingen, Germany.
Materials and MethodsThe ureteroscopes were compared for active deflection, irrigation flow, and optical characteristics. Each ureteroscope was evaluated with an empty working channel and with various accessories. Optical characteristics (resolution, grayscale imaging, and color representation) were measured using United States Air Force test targets. We digitally recorded a renal porcine ureteroscopy and laser ablation of a stone with the X2 and with the XC. Edited footage of the recorded procedure was shown to different expert surgeons (n=8) on a high-definition monitor for evaluation by questionnaire for image quality and performance.
ResultsThe XC had a higher resolution than the X2 at 20 and 10 mm 3.17 lines/mm vs 1.41 lines/mm, 10.1 vs 3.56, respectively (P=0.003, P=0.002). Color representation was better in the XC. There was no difference in contrast quality between the two ureteroscopes. For each individual ureteroscope, the upward deflection was greater than the downward deflection both with and without accessories. When compared with the X2, the XC manifested superior deflection and flow (P<0.0005, P<0.05) with and without accessory present in the working channel. Observers deemed the distal sensor ureteroscope superior in visualization in clear and bloody fields, as well as for illumination (P=0.0005, P=0.002, P=0.0125).
ConclusionsIn this in vitro and porcine evaluation, the distal sensor ureteroscope provided significantly improved resolution, color representation, and visualization in the upper urinary tract compared with a standard fiberoptic ureteroscope. The overall deflection was also better in the XC, and deflection as well as flow rate was less impaired by the various accessories.
Main Content
Enter the password to open this PDF file:
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-