Safe Transportation Research & Education Center

Parent: Institute of Transportation Studies at UC Berkeley

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for September through December, 2024

ItemTitleTotal requestsDownloadView-only%Dnld
2tt6v76xTess Lengyel, SafeTREC Seminar Dec 12: Policy and Planning at the Alameda County Transportation Commission2,71102,7110.0%
64h2s9cjEvaluate the Safety Effects of Adopting a Stop-as-Yield Law for Cyclists in California4397436516.9%
4st304h2California Traffic Safety Survey 2024: Data Analysis and Comparison with 2010-2023 Survey Data Results2372521210.5%
01t1w86cSafe Routes for Older Adults1572013712.7%
1sz522bjEquitable Transportation Planning for Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety through the Use of the Safe System Approach1543412022.1%
5q3317chMobility Safety for California’s Affordable Housing Residents: Co-locating Improvements1421512710.6%
0jq5h6f5Evaluating Research on Data Linkage to Assess Underreporting of Pedestrian and Bicyclist Injury in Police Crash Data108159313.9%
9b88z0gsConnecting Public Health and Transportation - Applying Crowdsourcing and Community Engagement Principles to Traffic Safety105277825.7%
9337t6142024 California Traffic Safety Survey Summary99108910.1%
5455454cSafe Routes to School Safety and Mobility Analysis96177917.7%
57s5214gA Comparative Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety Around University Campuses94375739.4%
3fh5q4dkOakland Chinatown Pedestrian Scramble: An Evaluation856797.1%
2n83w1q8Effectiveness of a Commercially Available Automated Pedestrian Counting Device in Urban Environments: Comparison with Manual Counts76146218.4%
8qz8m4fzSpace Syntax: The Role of Urban Form in Cyclist Route Choice in Central London63164725.4%
1h52s226Driver/Pedestrian Understanding and Behavior at Marked and Unmarked Crosswalks57193833.3%
8p7283ggAssessing and Addressing the Mobility Needs of an Aging Population56154126.8%
0c00b1j2Factors Associated with Hit-and-Run Pedestrian Fatalities and Driver Identification54322259.3%
0p27154nEstimating Pedestrian Accident Exposure: Automated Pedestrian Counting Devices Report53213239.6%
88w8b8g3False Alarms and Human-Machine Warning Systems534497.5%
80x918832020 SafeTREC Traffic Safety Facts: Aging Road Users52232944.2%
3zn9f4crEffects of Weather Variables on Pedestrian Volumes in Alameda County, California51143727.5%
50m064zpSpace Syntax: An Innovative Pedestrian Volume Modeling Tool for Pedestrian Safety515469.8%
91z1m2jm2021 SafeTREC Traffic Safety Fact Sheet: Drug-Involved Driving514477.8%
1tm284cmMissed or Delayed Medical Care Appointments by Older Users of Nonemergency Medical Transportation Services484448.3%
2nb4g4k2California Traffic Safety Survey 2023: Data Analysis and Comparison with 2010-2022 Survey Data Results460460.0%
6n00x12dEvaluation of Injury Severity Updates in California Collision Data460460.0%
8m59g6vxTen Years Later: Examining the Long-Term Impact of the California Safe Routes to School Program4654110.9%
9xg8n6vrThe relative vulnerability index: a framework for evaluating multimodal traffic safety4673915.2%
1m07078cTraffic Safety in Communities of Color45212446.7%
1xj3p75jCommunity Engagement at the Intersection of Public Health and Transportation: Highlighting Community Based Organizations’ Use of the Promotores Model for Engaging Community Members in the Field of Transportation4573815.6%
3qd7k0bvInfluential Factors on Level of Injury in Pedestrian Crashes: Applications of Ordered Probit Model with Robust Standard Errors4483618.2%
47t386cnGap acceptance for vehicles turning left across on-coming traffic: Implications for Intersection Decision Support design4463813.6%
0201j0v2Intersection Decision Support Project: Taxonomy of Crossing-Path Crashes at Intersections Using GES 2000 Data4353811.6%
9qn4q75xCalifornia Traffic Safety Survey 2021: Data Analysis and Comparison with 2010-2020 Survey Data Results430430.0%
1166w4pz2019: SafeTREC Traffic Safety Facts: Emergency Medical Services422404.8%
7j88g29jPre-Intervention Assessment: UC Davis Medical Center and California Health Care Safety Net Institute Child Passenger Safety Initiative422404.8%
89r2j4p5Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Evaluation for the City of Emeryville at Four Intersections4273516.7%
9qg3s59bRoadway and Infrastructure Design and Its Relation to Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety: Basic Principles, Applications, and Benefits423397.1%
1zn7w26vDo All Roadway Users Want the Same Things?41122929.3%
61n3s4zrPedestrian Volume Modeling for Traffic Safety and Exposure Analysis: The Case of Boston, Massachusetts41103124.4%
1fx5g427Traffic Safety Among Latino Populations in California: Current Status and Policy Recommendations40112927.5%
1rx0g3z7Impact of the Community Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Training: Program Insights from the 2024 Follow-Up Survey39112828.2%
37m6x95tSafe Routes to School Local School Project: A health evaluation at 10 low-income schools3943510.3%
7280d52gRural Road Links: A Review on Current Research Projects & Initiatives Aimed at Reducing Vehicle Crash Fatalities on Rural Roads393367.7%
0d48w4gzAssociation between Roadway Intersection Characteristics and Pedestrian Crash Risk in Alameda County, California38241463.2%
2g612244Health Impacts of the School Commute3843410.5%
11q5p33wGuidebook on Pedestrian and Bicycle Volume Data Collection37231462.2%
07b7g6622021 SafeTREC Traffic Safety Fact Sheet: Emergency Medical Services360360.0%
208349wfPedestrian Counting Methods at Intersections: a Comparative Study36112530.6%
2nc3v9b0Pedestrian and Bicycle Safety Strategies for UC Berkeley Campus and Periphery: Recommendations for Implementation3672919.4%

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.