Journal of Writing Assessment

eScholarship stats: History by Item for November, 2024 through February, 2025

Item	Title	Total requests	2025-02	2025-01	2024-12	2024-11
1b90q8rd	Comments on Student Papers: Student Perspectives	359	191	50	24	94
0934x4rm	Neurodivergence and Intersectionality in Labor-Based Grading Contracts	356	80	107	78	91
0j28w67h	A Legacy of Grading Contracts for Composition	318	67	75	85	91
3gm126sq	Construct Validity and the Demise of the Analytical Writing Placement Examination (AWPE) at the University of California: A Tale of Social Mobility	295	71	122	102
52k3376g	Assessment is Constructed and Contextual: Identity, Information Literacy, and Interview-Based Methodologies in the First-Year Writing Classroom	236	51	96	89
6vn170k5	The Strange Loop of Self-Efficacy and the Value of Focus Groups in Writing Program Assessment	230	43	77	110
9hn4297f	Editor’s Introduction: The “Accidental California Issue” – Critical Questions about Fairness and Equity in Writing Assessment and Placement	220	53	70	97
4b85378n	Collaborative Writing Placement: Partnering with Students in the Placement Process	209	44	69	96
7qh108bw	Critique of Mark D. Shermis & Ben Hamner, 'Contrasting State-of-the-Art Automated Scoring of Essays: Analysis'	203	23	53	80	47
1p60j218	Enabling Meaningful Labor: Narratives of Participation in a Grading Contract	202	38	55	57	52
263565cq	The BABEL Generator and E-Rater: 21st Century Writing Constructs and Automated Essay Scoring (AES)	197	48	49	41	59
36t565mm	A Theory of Ethics for Writing Assessment	197	58	36	52	51
3qr482bb	Multifaceted Equity: Critiquing a First-Year Writing Assessment through Curricular, Performance, and Reliability Lenses	172	45	62	65
2c4979b8	Contract Grading and the Development of an Efficacious Writerly Habitus	169	37	37	30	65
9175z7zs	Write Outside the Boxes: The Single Point Rubric in the Secondary ELA Classroom	168	37	41	35	55
5dp4m86t	The Empirical Development of an Instrument to Measure Writerly Self-Efficacy in Writing Centers	160	40	46	36	38
03g148gh	Reliability of National Writing Project's Analytic Writing Continuum Assessment System	159	27	44	41	47
5vq519dr	Globalizing Plagiarism & Writing Assessment: A Case Study of Turnitin	157	38	29	45	45
4bg9003k	An Integrated Design and Appraisal Framework for Ethical Writing Assessment	154	27	44	49	34
70g147sg	Achieving High Goals: The Impact of Contract Grading on High School Students' Academic Performance, Avoidance Orientation, and Social Comparison	152	39	30	34	49
5f79g6kz	College Students' Use of a Writing Rubric: Effect on Quality of Writing, Self-Efficacy, and Writing Practices	151	39	38	33	41
7mp54031	Editor’s Introduction: Special Issue on Student Self Placement (SSP)	149	31	25	39	54
7v9830xh	Placement is Everyone’s Business: A Love Letter to Our SSP Coalition	140	30	24	37	49
3wz6s1qb	Directed Self-Placement for Multilingual, Multicultural International Students	138	37	27	38	36
06n1v820	Linguistic microfeatures to predict L2 writing proficiency: A case study in Automated Writing Evaluation	137	26	36	43	32
0xh7v6fb	Decolonizing Validity	137	37	32	35	33
4v65z263	Building Student Agency Through Contract Grading in Technical Communication	132	38	37	27	30
1bn464xs	Testing the Tests, a review of George Hillocks: The Testing Trap: How State Writing Assessments Control Learning	128	25	29	40	34
6w87j2wp	Reframing Reliability for Writing Assessment	127	34	26	34	33
93b9g3t6	Big Rubrics and Weird Genres: The Futility of Using Generic Assessment Tools Across Diverse Instructional Contexts	127	30	42	29	26
3pc0n4dz	After Implementation: Assessing Student Self-Placement in College Writing Programs	123	31	26	36	30
7gz1c60w	Dynamic Patterns: Emotional Episodes within Teachers' Response Practices	121	13	18	25	65
07c5j8tp	Self-Characterization in the Self-Placement Assessment Ecology: Complicating the Stories We Tell about DSP’s Effects and Effectiveness	120	25	22	38	35
3dc6w4hg	What Do We Reward in Reflection? Assessing Reflective Writing with the Index for Metacognitive Knowledge	116	47	24	22	23
02q4g1gt	Contract Grading in a Technical Writing Classroom: A Case Study	114	21	15	32	46
3c26v2hh	The Effects of Student-Fashioning and Teacher-Pleasing in the Assessment of First-Year Writing Reflective Essays	114	25	37	19	33
2k14r1zg	Ethical Considerations and Writing Assessment	112	37	31	23	21
2bt3m3nf	This is Not Only a Test: Exploring Structured Ethical Blindness in the Testing Industry	110	11	15	49	35
4xb1c9gj	The Effect of Scoring Order on the Independence of Holistic and Analytic Scores	110	29	31	27	23
8rb1j91b	Access, Digital Writing, and Achievement: The Data in Two Diverse School Districts	108	22	24	24	38
7m18h956	Validity inquiry of race and shared evaluation practices in a large-scale, university-wide writing portfolio assessment	107	23	29	32	23
2w69x0w5	Shifting the Locus of Control: Why the Common Core State Standards and Emerging Standardized Tests May Reshape College Writing Classrooms	105	19	27	35	24
3zw9h7p9	Stories About Grading Contracts, or How Do I Like Through the Violence I've Done?	104	22	37	20	25
6qc0j26v	Perceptions of Fairness in Summer Bridge Classrooms with Contract Grades	104	20	21	18	45
9fw125t3	Informing Self-Placement: A Polyvocal Narrative Case Study	103	27	22	36	18
1f21q8ck	To Aggregate or Not? Linguistic Features in Automatic Essay Scoring and Feedback Systems	102	24	32	22	24
20w3m5d9	Assessing Academic Discourse: Levels of Competence in Handling Knowledge From Sources	100	24	36	25	15
2jw1298d	Supporting Student Linguistic Identity and Autonomy in Directed Self Placement Through Linguistic Domains Using Qualtrics Scoring	98	25	18	26	29
2c45c0gf	Engaging in Resistant Genres as Antiracist Teacher Response	93	22	19	19	33
9hw9p7hc	Book Review: Labor-Based Grading Contracts: Building Equity and Inclusion in the Writing Classroom by Asao B. Inoue	93	31	18	21	23

Top

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.