Journal of Writing Assessment

eScholarship stats: History by Item for June through September, 2026

Item	Title	Total requests	2026-09	2026-08	2026-07	2026-06
263565cq	The BABEL Generator and E-Rater: 21st Century Writing Constructs and Automated Essay Scoring (AES)	625	137	235	105	148
7qh108bw	Critique of Mark D. Shermis & Ben Hamner, 'Contrasting State-of-the-Art Automated Scoring of Essays: Analysis'	555	112	170	69	204
06n1v820	Linguistic microfeatures to predict L2 writing proficiency: A case study in Automated Writing Evaluation	487	117	157	104	109
0j28w67h	A Legacy of Grading Contracts for Composition	418	121	146	75	76
0934x4rm	Neurodivergence and Intersectionality in Labor-Based Grading Contracts	411	125	97	57	132
081343dw	Metis as a Pedagogical Framework for Approaching Alternative Writing Assessment: Embracing Neurodiversity Through Adaptation	398	115	107	54	122
5vq519dr	Globalizing Plagiarism & Writing Assessment: A Case Study of Turnitin	375	77	122	80	96
03g148gh	Reliability of National Writing Project's Analytic Writing Continuum Assessment System	369	125	113	44	87
70g147sg	Achieving High Goals: The Impact of Contract Grading on High School Students' Academic Performance, Avoidance Orientation, and Social Comparison	356	45	121	104	86
1n22m978	Writing Assessment Validity: Adapting Kane's Argument-Based Validation Approach to the Assessment of Writing in the Post-Process Era	341	91	104	45	101
5dp4m86t	The Empirical Development of an Instrument to Measure Writerly Self-Efficacy in Writing Centers	321	82	104	44	91
9hw9p7hc	Book Review: Labor-Based Grading Contracts: Building Equity and Inclusion in the Writing Classroom by Asao B. Inoue	321	97	91	55	78
36t565mm	A Theory of Ethics for Writing Assessment	299	55	93	62	89
7rt5v9p2	Innovation and the California State University and Colleges English Equivalency Examination, 1973-1981: An Organizational Perspective	293	55	128	52	58
15b5n3hd	Following the North Star: Movement Toward Universal Writing Assessment	278	53	72	63	90
8nq5w3t0	Introduction to a Special Issue on a Theory of Ethics for Writing Assessment	276	91	71	28	86
3nf6r4kv	Automated Essay Scoring in Innovative Assessments of Writing from Sources	269	50	49	71	99
83b618ww	Uncovering Rater's Cognitive Processing and Focus Using Think-Aloud Protocols	266	75	91	42	58
2c4979b8	Contract Grading and the Development of an Efficacious Writerly Habitus	253	53	71	47	82
4b85378n	Collaborative Writing Placement: Partnering with Students in the Placement Process	253	48	69	77	59
3dc6w4hg	What Do We Reward in Reflection? Assessing Reflective Writing with the Index for Metacognitive Knowledge	251	48	64	63	76
0q34x1vh	The Effects of Automated Writing Evaluation Technology on Improving Student Writing	249	39	90	55	65
1p60j218	Enabling Meaningful Labor: Narratives of Participation in a Grading Contract	244	46	88	53	57
1hm9j7pk	Using Appraisal Theory to Understand Rater Values: An Examination of Rater Comments on ESL Test Essays	243	97	63	22	61
4wg8w0ng	Beyond Tradition: Writing Placement, Fairness, and Success at a Two-Year College	243	57	75	40	71
5rx5c6f2	Introduction, JWA Special Issue on Disability, Neurodivergence, and Writing Assessment	243	65	83	46	49
1t5810bz	The Power of Tests: A Critical Perspective on the Uses of Language Texts by Elana Shohamy	239	68	68	37	66
41p347tg	Decoupling Documentation From Disability: A First Step Toward Centering Neurodivergent and Disabled Writers in Writing Assessment Practices	233	49	54	31	99
9175z7zs	Write Outside the Boxes: The Single Point Rubric in the Secondary ELA Classroom	232	71	65	27	69
0xh7v6fb	Decolonizing Validity	218	49	71	43	55
8rb1j91b	Access, Digital Writing, and Achievement: The Data in Two Diverse School Districts	218	34	93	36	55
1b90q8rd	Comments on Student Papers: Student Perspectives	215	58	46	30	81
31c793kf	Reflection. An Admitted Student is a Qualified Student: A Roadmap for Writing Placement in the Two-Year College	214	45	73	51	45
5f79g6kz	College Students' Use of a Writing Rubric: Effect on Quality of Writing, Self-Efficacy, and Writing Practices	214	44	87	38	45
3gm126sq	Construct Validity and the Demise of the Analytical Writing Placement Examination (AWPE) at the University of California: A Tale of Social Mobility	213	38	56	58	61
5bp9z402	Beyond Retrofitting: Crip Engagement, Radical Flexibility, and Alternative Futures for Writing Assessment	212	53	38	37	84
73s8c743	An Annotated Bibliography of Writing Assessment: Machine Scoring and Evaluation of Essay-length Writing	212	59	67	37	49
4gf435hz	On Neurodivergence/Disability and Labor-Based Grading: A Response to Kryger and Zimmerman (2020) and Carillo (2021)	209	39	84	32	54
5575w31k	The Path to Competency-Based Certification: A Look at the LEAP Challenge and the VALUE Rubric for Written Communication	209	47	87	32	43
8393560s	Introduction: Writing Assessment, Placement, and the Two-Year College	208	41	65	53	49
4bg9003k	An Integrated Design and Appraisal Framework for Ethical Writing Assessment	206	42	41	47	76
5tw695cz	Understanding Proficiency: Analyzing the Characteristics of Secondary Studentsâ€™ On-Demand Analytical Essay Writing	202	39	58	31	74
3w0665n2	Disability, Normativity, and the Agentive Promises of Placement	198	42	58	44	54
1f21q8ck	To Aggregate or Not? Linguistic Features in Automatic Essay Scoring and Feedback Systems	197	47	64	36	50
3zw9h7p9	Stories About Grading Contracts, or How Do I Like Through the Violence I've Done?	196	50	54	42	50
7bm4t40t	ePortfolios: Foundational Measurement Issues	195	50	73	26	46
94b4m5f9	Big Data, Learning Analytics, and Social Assessment1	193	49	48	45	51
6g81k736	Directed Self-Placement at Two-Year Colleges: A Kairotic Moment	192	34	45	55	58
8nv3w3w8	Validity of Automated Scoring: Prologue for a Continuing Discussion of Machine Scoring Student Writing	191	133	23	14	21
2c45c0gf	Engaging in Resistant Genres as Antiracist Teacher Response	190	68	57	24	41

Top

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.