Oceanography Program Publications
Parent: Oceanography Program, California Department of Parks & Recreation
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for April through July, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4tm114zf | The Myth and Reality of Southern California Beaches | 62 | 46 | 16 | 74.2% |
| 9md5g3vx | Coastal vulnerability across the Pacific dominated by El Nino/Southern Oscillation | 54 | 16 | 38 | 29.6% |
| 6pt8q7qc | A Framework for Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment for Southwest U.S. Military Installationsmework for Sea Level Rise Vulnerability Assessment for Southwest U.S. Military Installations | 51 | 41 | 10 | 80.4% |
| 0ff253kt | California’s Fourth Climate Change Assessment | 48 | 39 | 9 | 81.3% |
| 579326kr | Global distribution of coastal cliffs | 48 | 30 | 18 | 62.5% |
| 4h55g6zf | Comparison of Airborne and Terrestrial Lidar Estimates of Seacliff Erosion in Southern California | 47 | 11 | 36 | 23.4% |
| 0c49k386 | Shoreline Erosion Assessment and Atlas of the San Diego Region | 41 | 21 | 20 | 51.2% |
| 6wk9w0g6 | Amateur Radio from Antarctica | 40 | 4 | 36 | 10.0% |
| 033010kh | Storm surge in the San Francisco Bay/Delta and nearby coastal locations | 37 | 16 | 21 | 43.2% |
| 34f5s9tb | Infragravity Seiches in a Small Harbor | 37 | 18 | 19 | 48.6% |
| 0tf6w5gx | Coastal Flood Modeling Challenges in Defended Urban Backshores | 35 | 13 | 22 | 37.1% |
| 2bw8z3z0 | Effects of the 2015-2016 El Niño on Water Levels in Southern California Estuaries and Implications for Elevated Sea-levels | 34 | 18 | 16 | 52.9% |
| 8vh4m2qz | Climate change scenarios and sea level rise estimates for the California 2009 Climate Change Scenarios Assessment | 34 | 22 | 12 | 64.7% |
| 9rg8617t | Application of Airborne LIDAR for Seacliff Volumetric Change and Beach-Sediment Budget Contributions | 34 | 20 | 14 | 58.8% |
| 1qw240t0 | Relating Future Coastal Conditions to Existing FEMA Flood Hazard Maps: Technical Methods Manual | 33 | 19 | 14 | 57.6% |
| 3ds995nm | A Comparison of Spectral Refraction and Refraction-Diffraction Wave Models | 33 | 17 | 16 | 51.5% |
| 3kr2d9x4 | Temperature dependence of Pacific sardine ( Sardinops sagax ) recruitment in the California Current Ecosystem revisited and revised | 32 | 12 | 20 | 37.5% |
| 2j56s8r5 | Observations of coastal cliff base waves, sand levels, and cliff top shaking | 30 | 21 | 9 | 70.0% |
| 3k2933rc | Transoceanic infragravity waves impacting Antarctic ice shelves | 30 | 9 | 21 | 30.0% |
| 4pf94155 | Short-term retreat statistics of a slowly eroding coastal cliff | 30 | 16 | 14 | 53.3% |
| 2dq3b6df | Influence of El Niños on California Wave Climate | 29 | 10 | 19 | 34.5% |
| 8tv4w9g3 | Regional Swell Transformation by Backward Ray Tracing and SWAN | 29 | 10 | 19 | 34.5% |
| 0d5189jg | Occurrence and distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface sediments of San Diego Bay marinas | 28 | 8 | 20 | 28.6% |
| 1cb7d2n9 | Measuring the Nearshore Wave Climate: California Experience | 28 | 9 | 19 | 32.1% |
| 5cr1p61c | Effects of Southern California Kelp Beds on Waves | 28 | 15 | 13 | 53.6% |
| 60c5d5fk | New technology in coastal wave monitoring | 28 | 18 | 10 | 64.3% |
| 9sb5f1s5 | San Diego, 2050 Is Calling. HOW WILL WE ANSWER? - FACING THE FUTURE: How Science Can Help Prepare San Diego Regional Leaders for Climate Change | 28 | 14 | 14 | 50.0% |
| 09j8x698 | Biofouling Effects on the Response of a Wave Measurement Buoy in Deep Water | 27 | 8 | 19 | 29.6% |
| 0tr2v6np | Calibration and assessment of process-based numerical models for beach profile evolution in southern California | 27 | 15 | 12 | 55.6% |
| 20s6j2vw | A Worldwide Survey of Recent Ocean Observatory Activities: 2017 Update | 27 | 19 | 8 | 70.4% |
| 42h968qh | Beach changes from construction of San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, 1964-1989 | 27 | 9 | 18 | 33.3% |
| 79m2h3vq | The Role of Stakeholders in Creating Societal Value From Coastal and Ocean Observations | 27 | 7 | 20 | 25.9% |
| 10v8j28f | Validated coastal flood modeling at Imperial Beach, California: Comparing total water level, empirical and numerical overtopping methodologies | 26 | 11 | 15 | 42.3% |
| 2kj050nj | Ground motions on rocky, cliffed, and sandy shorelines generated by ocean waves | 26 | 12 | 14 | 46.2% |
| 4272j700 | Observations of the shape and group dynamics of rogue waves | 26 | 15 | 11 | 57.7% |
| 5846m8hm | Trends in United States Tidal Datum Statistics and Tide Range | 26 | 13 | 13 | 50.0% |
| 5xm4j3px | CDIP wave observations during Hurricanes Irma, Jose, and Maria, and a nor’easter | 26 | 11 | 15 | 42.3% |
| 7865260j | The Great Storm of January 1988 | 26 | 6 | 20 | 23.1% |
| 0354x8dp | Global trends in extremal microseism intensity | 25 | 6 | 19 | 24.0% |
| 1rr4g18h | The near-coastal microseism spectrum: Spatial and temporal wave climate relationships | 25 | 13 | 12 | 52.0% |
| 2tj688nz | Extreme oceanographic forcing and coastal response due to the 2015-2016 El Nino | 25 | 12 | 13 | 48.0% |
| 7rq7z2rb | Coastal Flood Modeling Challenges in Defended Urban Backshores | 25 | 6 | 19 | 24.0% |
| 96h110j3 | Observations of turbulence in the surf zone | 25 | 12 | 13 | 48.0% |
| 9rq321pv | Seasonal temperature dynamics of the upper ocean in the Southern California Bight | 25 | 11 | 14 | 44.0% |
| 0mv0v3z8 | Effect of wave frequency and directional spread on shoreline runup | 24 | 11 | 13 | 45.8% |
| 2vz4d4c5 | A comparison of two spectral wave models in the Southern California Bight | 24 | 15 | 9 | 62.5% |
| 4p82t4mt | California tides, sea level, and waves — Winter 2015-2016 | 24 | 11 | 13 | 45.8% |
| 1rw8m11j | Sea Surface Temperature Variability at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography Pier | 23 | 8 | 15 | 34.8% |
| 28q2j7d3 | Assimilating Coastal Wave Observations in Regional Swell Predictions. Part I: Inverse Methods | 23 | 10 | 13 | 43.5% |
| 4kc942s3 | Seasonal Changes in Sand Level and Wave Energy on Southern California Beaches | 23 | 8 | 15 | 34.8% |
Disclaimer: due to the evolving nature of the web traffic we receive and the methods we use to collate it, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision.