University of California Energy Institute
Parent: UC Berkeley
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for March through June, 2024
Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3ws6r3j4 | The Market Value and Cost of Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Production | 449 | 56 | 393 | 12.5% |
11w8d6m4 | Dynamic Pricing, Advanced Metering, and Demand Response in Electricity Markets | 352 | 104 | 248 | 29.5% |
4bf4j0gw | Doing Well By Doing Good? Green Office Buildings | 149 | 29 | 120 | 19.5% |
2dk5g982 | The Economic Impacts of Climate Change: Evidence from Agricultural Profits and Random Fluctuations in Weather | 147 | 5 | 142 | 3.4% |
4pd8s3h1 | Does Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana | 147 | 14 | 133 | 9.5% |
3d8252zp | Does Extending Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from an Australian Experiment | 113 | 8 | 105 | 7.1% |
1h6141nj | The Effect of Improved Fuel Economy on Vehicle Miles Traveled: Estimating the Rebound Effect Using U.S. State Data, 1966-2001 | 107 | 12 | 95 | 11.2% |
7vq1m8mq | Market Power in California's Gasoline Market | 81 | 5 | 76 | 6.2% |
3sr1h8nc | Equity Effects of Increasing-Block Electricity Pricing | 75 | 23 | 52 | 30.7% |
3td3n1x1 | Residential Customer Response to Real-time Pricing: The Anaheim Critical Peak Pricing Experiment | 73 | 23 | 50 | 31.5% |
06h949cj | Quantifying the Air Pollution Exposure Consequences of Distributed Electricity Generation | 64 | 6 | 58 | 9.4% |
3fg2r29s | Understanding Crude Oil Prices | 60 | 20 | 40 | 33.3% |
2159m46p | Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market | 58 | 20 | 38 | 34.5% |
74s774zj | Clearing the Air? The Effects of Gasoline Content Regulation on Air Quality | 54 | 14 | 40 | 25.9% |
744256hh | Road Pricing and Public Transport | 52 | 7 | 45 | 13.5% |
53q5q8rs | Taxes and Trading versus Intensity Standards: Second-Best Environmental Policies with Incomplete Regulation (Leakage) or Market Power | 51 | 4 | 47 | 7.8% |
86m171mn | Evidence of a Shift in the Short-Run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand | 48 | 4 | 44 | 8.3% |
27r2k4nf | Explaining the Price of Voluntary Carbon Offsets | 45 | 17 | 28 | 37.8% |
1nm1408v | A Motor-Integrated Parallel Hybrid Transmission | 43 | 13 | 30 | 30.2% |
0wj3x8bm | Does Britain or The United States Have the Right Gas Tax? | 42 | 6 | 36 | 14.3% |
4g746523 | Economic and Emissions Implications of Load-Based, Source-based and First-seller Emissions Trading Programs under California AB32 | 40 | 16 | 24 | 40.0% |
9tk2c4s9 | Electricity Rate Structures and the Economics of Solar PV: Could Mandatory Time-of-Use Rates Undermine California’s Solar Photovoltaic Subsidies? | 37 | 7 | 30 | 18.9% |
3qb650hh | Do Households Smooth Small Consumption Shocks? Evidence from Anticipated and Unanticipated Variation in Home Energy Costs | 36 | 5 | 31 | 13.9% |
09v4k44b | Towards a Sustainable Energy Balance: Progressive Efficiency and the Return of Energy Conservation | 35 | 7 | 28 | 20.0% |
6dr9d5kw | Additions to a Design Tool for Visualizing the Energy Implications of California’s Climates | 35 | 24 | 11 | 68.6% |
8dv5c0t1 | Ownership Change, Incentives and Plant Efficiency: The Divestiture of U.S. Electric Generation Plants | 35 | 13 | 22 | 37.1% |
34c206t9 | The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing | 34 | 6 | 28 | 17.6% |
6br429mf | Using Environmental Emissions Permit Prices to Raise Electricity Prices: Evidence from the California Electricity Market | 30 | 9 | 21 | 30.0% |
99k818c4 | The Potential of Cellulosic Ethanol Production from Municipal Solid Waste: A Technical and Economic Evaluation | 30 | 6 | 24 | 20.0% |
0mx44472 | Speculative Trading and Market Performance: The Effect of Arbitrageurs on Efficiency and Market Power in the New York Electricity Market | 29 | 7 | 22 | 24.1% |
2c96w6ff | From Investor-owned Utility to Independent Power Producer | 29 | 10 | 19 | 34.5% |
6266b54f | Asymmetric Price Adjustment and Consumer Search: An Examination of the Retail Gasoline Market | 29 | 9 | 20 | 31.0% |
37z0q55p | A New Design Tool for Visualizing the Energy Implications of California's Climates | 27 | 2 | 25 | 7.4% |
5kv1k2hr | Oligopoly Equilibria in Electricity Contract Markets | 27 | 6 | 21 | 22.2% |
2k54m0zk | On the Efficiency of Competitive Electricity Markets With Time-Invariant Retail Prices | 26 | 5 | 21 | 19.2% |
5sf4m6rr | Retail Policies and Competition in the Gasoline Industry | 26 | 8 | 18 | 30.8% |
6m3355kj | California's Greenhouse Gas Policies: Local Solutions to a Global Problem? | 26 | 5 | 21 | 19.2% |
9241c68t | Market Structure and Competition: A Cross-Market Analysis of U.S. Electricity Deregulation | 25 | 3 | 22 | 12.0% |
26k8h7v9 | Vertical Integration in Restructured Electricity Markets: Measuring Market Efficiency and Firm Conduct | 24 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% |
7xg1t4ch | Why Do Companies Rent Green? Real Property and Corporate Social Responsibility | 24 | 6 | 18 | 25.0% |
8jh5x7z4 | Decision-making in Electricity Generation Based on Global Warming Potential and Life-cycle Assessment for Climate Change | 24 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% |
54c0f88g | Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Abatement | 23 | 5 | 18 | 21.7% |
3zn6s6nf | Testing Strategic Models of Firm Behavior in Restructured Electricity Markets: A Case Study of ERCOT | 22 | 2 | 20 | 9.1% |
4bz9j4wr | Modeling and Computing Two-settlement Oligopolistic Equilibrium in a Congested Electricity Network | 22 | 15 | 7 | 68.2% |
7nm2f6sx | When it comes to Demand Response, is FERC its Own Worst Enemy? | 22 | 3 | 19 | 13.6% |
2m41d45s | Do Americans Consume Too Little Natural Gas? An Empirical Test of Marginal Cost Pricing | 21 | 2 | 19 | 9.5% |
8913v4bk | An Empirical Assessment of the Competitiveness of the New England Electricity Market | 21 | 7 | 14 | 33.3% |
8tq6z6t0 | Ensuring Generation Adequacy in Competitive Electricity Markets | 21 | 5 | 16 | 23.8% |
0v38t8r8 | Valuing the Time-Varying Electricity Production of Solar Photovoltaic Cells | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0.0% |
31r8p2jv | Modeling Flow and Heat Transfer Through Porous Media for High Heat Flux Applications | 20 | 3 | 17 | 15.0% |
Disclaimer: due to the evolving nature of the web traffic we receive and the methods we use to collate it, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision.