Center for the Study of Energy Markets
Parent: University of California Energy Institute (Archive)
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for April through July, 2026
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11w8d6m4 | Dynamic Pricing, Advanced Metering, and Demand Response in Electricity Markets | 395 | 150 | 245 | 38.0% |
| 4bf4j0gw | Doing Well By Doing Good? Green Office Buildings | 361 | 55 | 306 | 15.2% |
| 3ws6r3j4 | The Market Value and Cost of Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Production | 341 | 64 | 277 | 18.8% |
| 6266b54f | Asymmetric Price Adjustment and Consumer Search: An Examination of the Retail Gasoline Market | 320 | 56 | 264 | 17.5% |
| 74s774zj | Clearing the Air? The Effects of Gasoline Content Regulation on Air Quality | 288 | 128 | 160 | 44.4% |
| 2159m46p | Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market | 225 | 103 | 122 | 45.8% |
| 86m171mn | Evidence of a Shift in the Short-Run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand | 218 | 54 | 164 | 24.8% |
| 2c96w6ff | From Investor-owned Utility to Independent Power Producer | 217 | 45 | 172 | 20.7% |
| 3d8252zp | Does Extending Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from an Australian Experiment | 212 | 56 | 156 | 26.4% |
| 3g9504bb | The Implied Cost of Carbon Dioxide under the Cash for Clunkers Program | 200 | 43 | 157 | 21.5% |
| 34c206t9 | The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing | 197 | 40 | 157 | 20.3% |
| 8dv5c0t1 | Ownership Change, Incentives and Plant Efficiency: The Divestiture of U.S. Electric Generation Plants | 188 | 72 | 116 | 38.3% |
| 0h90r7k2 | Building Out Alternative Fuel Retail Infrastructure: Government Fleet Spillovers in E85 | 181 | 71 | 110 | 39.2% |
| 7nm2f6sx | When it comes to Demand Response, is FERC its Own Worst Enemy? | 174 | 49 | 125 | 28.2% |
| 2m41d45s | Do Americans Consume Too Little Natural Gas? An Empirical Test of Marginal Cost Pricing | 168 | 57 | 111 | 33.9% |
| 85k8w3k7 | The History of Electricity Restructuring in California | 166 | 25 | 141 | 15.1% |
| 27r2k4nf | Explaining the Price of Voluntary Carbon Offsets | 164 | 51 | 113 | 31.1% |
| 53q5q8rs | Taxes and Trading versus Intensity Standards: Second-Best Environmental Policies with Incomplete Regulation (Leakage) or Market Power | 164 | 41 | 123 | 25.0% |
| 3td3n1x1 | Residential Customer Response to Real-time Pricing: The Anaheim Critical Peak Pricing Experiment | 159 | 42 | 117 | 26.4% |
| 3sr1h8nc | Equity Effects of Increasing-Block Electricity Pricing | 147 | 54 | 93 | 36.7% |
| 6dw241sv | Measuring Unilateral Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets: The California Market 1998 - 2000 | 145 | 64 | 81 | 44.1% |
| 3qb650hh | Do Households Smooth Small Consumption Shocks? Evidence from Anticipated and Unanticipated Variation in Home Energy Costs | 144 | 42 | 102 | 29.2% |
| 0128s4r3 | Lessons from International Experience with Electricity Market Monitoring | 142 | 32 | 110 | 22.5% |
| 7p0168sp | What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California’s NOx Trading Program | 130 | 47 | 83 | 36.2% |
| 9jb8p7nn | Automobiles on Steroids: Product Attribute Trade-Offs and Technological Progress in the Automobile Sector | 130 | 43 | 87 | 33.1% |
| 2k54m0zk | On the Efficiency of Competitive Electricity Markets With Time-Invariant Retail Prices | 127 | 43 | 84 | 33.9% |
| 6m3355kj | California's Greenhouse Gas Policies: Local Solutions to a Global Problem? | 124 | 39 | 85 | 31.5% |
| 09648358 | The Distributional and Environmental Effects of Time-Varying Prices in Competitive Electricity Markets | 123 | 40 | 83 | 32.5% |
| 5sf4m6rr | Retail Policies and Competition in the Gasoline Industry | 121 | 56 | 65 | 46.3% |
| 5dt476pc | Lessons from the California Electricity Crisis | 120 | 28 | 92 | 23.3% |
| 09v4k44b | Towards a Sustainable Energy Balance: Progressive Efficiency and the Return of Energy Conservation | 118 | 35 | 83 | 29.7% |
| 0mx44472 | Speculative Trading and Market Performance: The Effect of Arbitrageurs on Efficiency and Market Power in the New York Electricity Market | 117 | 30 | 87 | 25.6% |
| 9241c68t | Market Structure and Competition: A Cross-Market Analysis of U.S. Electricity Deregulation | 116 | 46 | 70 | 39.7% |
| 7vq1m8mq | Market Power in California's Gasoline Market | 113 | 31 | 82 | 27.4% |
| 9tk2c4s9 | Electricity Rate Structures and the Economics of Solar PV: Could Mandatory Time-of-Use Rates Undermine California’s Solar Photovoltaic Subsidies? | 113 | 26 | 87 | 23.0% |
| 4pd8s3h1 | Does Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana | 107 | 44 | 63 | 41.1% |
| 6qr7m8kh | Market Effects of Environmental Regulation: Coal, Railroads and the 1990 Clean Air Act | 107 | 52 | 55 | 48.6% |
| 5kv1k2hr | Oligopoly Equilibria in Electricity Contract Markets | 106 | 34 | 72 | 32.1% |
| 4vd3k3jt | The Length of Contracts and Collusion | 105 | 47 | 58 | 44.8% |
| 0v38t8r8 | Valuing the Time-Varying Electricity Production of Solar Photovoltaic Cells | 102 | 23 | 79 | 22.5% |
| 1nn681tk | Climate Change, Mortality, and Adaptation: Evidence from Annual Fluctuations in Weather in the US | 101 | 23 | 78 | 22.8% |
| 6c79b2b1 | Averting Enforcement: Strategic Response to the Threat of Environmental Regulation | 100 | 61 | 39 | 61.0% |
| 1qw1c912 | The Implementation of California AB 32 and its Impact on Wholesale Electricity Markets | 99 | 30 | 69 | 30.3% |
| 5x5543dg | An Equilibrium Model of Investment in Restructured Electricity Markets | 98 | 36 | 62 | 36.7% |
| 7m28150r | Index Contracts and Spot Market Competition | 97 | 32 | 65 | 33.0% |
| 4bx684r8 | Designing Electricity Auctions | 96 | 55 | 41 | 57.3% |
| 65h8p4sb | Cournot Competition, Financial Option Markets, and Efficiency | 96 | 41 | 55 | 42.7% |
| 54c0f88g | Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Abatement | 94 | 34 | 60 | 36.2% |
| 9s75171w | California's Electricity Crisis: A Market Apart? | 93 | 35 | 58 | 37.6% |
| 1hj0983z | Demand-Side Management and Energy Efficiency Revisited | 91 | 40 | 51 | 44.0% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.