Center for the Study of Energy Markets
Parent: University of California Energy Institute
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for January through April, 2025
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3ws6r3j4 | The Market Value and Cost of Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Production | 354 | 33 | 321 | 9.3% |
| 11w8d6m4 | Dynamic Pricing, Advanced Metering, and Demand Response in Electricity Markets | 255 | 64 | 191 | 25.1% |
| 4pd8s3h1 | Does Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana | 179 | 22 | 157 | 12.3% |
| 4bf4j0gw | Doing Well By Doing Good? Green Office Buildings | 149 | 33 | 116 | 22.1% |
| 3td3n1x1 | Residential Customer Response to Real-time Pricing: The Anaheim Critical Peak Pricing Experiment | 147 | 16 | 131 | 10.9% |
| 2dk5g982 | The Economic Impacts of Climate Change: Evidence from Agricultural Profits and Random Fluctuations in Weather | 125 | 9 | 116 | 7.2% |
| 3d8252zp | Does Extending Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from an Australian Experiment | 120 | 17 | 103 | 14.2% |
| 86m171mn | Evidence of a Shift in the Short-Run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand | 92 | 5 | 87 | 5.4% |
| 74s774zj | Clearing the Air? The Effects of Gasoline Content Regulation on Air Quality | 87 | 5 | 82 | 5.7% |
| 2159m46p | Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market | 74 | 17 | 57 | 23.0% |
| 9tk2c4s9 | Electricity Rate Structures and the Economics of Solar PV: Could Mandatory Time-of-Use Rates Undermine California’s Solar Photovoltaic Subsidies? | 67 | 10 | 57 | 14.9% |
| 3sr1h8nc | Equity Effects of Increasing-Block Electricity Pricing | 65 | 20 | 45 | 30.8% |
| 7vq1m8mq | Market Power in California's Gasoline Market | 65 | 4 | 61 | 6.2% |
| 27r2k4nf | Explaining the Price of Voluntary Carbon Offsets | 60 | 17 | 43 | 28.3% |
| 8dv5c0t1 | Ownership Change, Incentives and Plant Efficiency: The Divestiture of U.S. Electric Generation Plants | 52 | 15 | 37 | 28.8% |
| 9241c68t | Market Structure and Competition: A Cross-Market Analysis of U.S. Electricity Deregulation | 52 | 14 | 38 | 26.9% |
| 09v4k44b | Towards a Sustainable Energy Balance: Progressive Efficiency and the Return of Energy Conservation | 49 | 7 | 42 | 14.3% |
| 9s75171w | California's Electricity Crisis: A Market Apart? | 46 | 9 | 37 | 19.6% |
| 6dw241sv | Measuring Unilateral Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets: The California Market 1998 - 2000 | 45 | 7 | 38 | 15.6% |
| 0mx44472 | Speculative Trading and Market Performance: The Effect of Arbitrageurs on Efficiency and Market Power in the New York Electricity Market | 44 | 2 | 42 | 4.5% |
| 34c206t9 | The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing | 44 | 6 | 38 | 13.6% |
| 6br429mf | Using Environmental Emissions Permit Prices to Raise Electricity Prices: Evidence from the California Electricity Market | 41 | 9 | 32 | 22.0% |
| 7p0168sp | What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California’s NOx Trading Program | 41 | 11 | 30 | 26.8% |
| 2k54m0zk | On the Efficiency of Competitive Electricity Markets With Time-Invariant Retail Prices | 40 | 2 | 38 | 5.0% |
| 2m41d45s | Do Americans Consume Too Little Natural Gas? An Empirical Test of Marginal Cost Pricing | 40 | 4 | 36 | 10.0% |
| 53q5q8rs | Taxes and Trading versus Intensity Standards: Second-Best Environmental Policies with Incomplete Regulation (Leakage) or Market Power | 39 | 4 | 35 | 10.3% |
| 7nm2f6sx | When it comes to Demand Response, is FERC its Own Worst Enemy? | 39 | 11 | 28 | 28.2% |
| 0h90r7k2 | Building Out Alternative Fuel Retail Infrastructure: Government Fleet Spillovers in E85 | 38 | 19 | 19 | 50.0% |
| 3qb650hh | Do Households Smooth Small Consumption Shocks? Evidence from Anticipated and Unanticipated Variation in Home Energy Costs | 38 | 10 | 28 | 26.3% |
| 0v38t8r8 | Valuing the Time-Varying Electricity Production of Solar Photovoltaic Cells | 36 | 4 | 32 | 11.1% |
| 6266b54f | Asymmetric Price Adjustment and Consumer Search: An Examination of the Retail Gasoline Market | 36 | 14 | 22 | 38.9% |
| 9xz9r2gm | The Implications of a Gasoline Price Floor for the California Budget and Greenhouse Gas Emissions | 35 | 3 | 32 | 8.6% |
| 5dt476pc | Lessons from the California Electricity Crisis | 32 | 3 | 29 | 9.4% |
| 3dh7v8bq | The Impact of the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 on Electric Utilities and Coal Mines: Evidence from the Stock Market | 31 | 6 | 25 | 19.4% |
| 54c0f88g | Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Abatement | 31 | 6 | 25 | 19.4% |
| 2c96w6ff | From Investor-owned Utility to Independent Power Producer | 30 | 8 | 22 | 26.7% |
| 3g9504bb | The Implied Cost of Carbon Dioxide under the Cash for Clunkers Program | 30 | 5 | 25 | 16.7% |
| 0128s4r3 | Lessons from International Experience with Electricity Market Monitoring | 29 | 6 | 23 | 20.7% |
| 4dd7f3mq | Capacity Markets for Electricity | 29 | 10 | 19 | 34.5% |
| 4vd3k3jt | The Length of Contracts and Collusion | 28 | 6 | 22 | 21.4% |
| 5sf4m6rr | Retail Policies and Competition in the Gasoline Industry | 27 | 5 | 22 | 18.5% |
| 09648358 | The Distributional and Environmental Effects of Time-Varying Prices in Competitive Electricity Markets | 26 | 4 | 22 | 15.4% |
| 1hj0983z | Demand-Side Management and Energy Efficiency Revisited | 26 | 4 | 22 | 15.4% |
| 4bx684r8 | Designing Electricity Auctions | 26 | 10 | 16 | 38.5% |
| 68q5f5td | Regulation, Allocation, and Leakage in Cap-and-Trade Markets for CO2 | 26 | 2 | 24 | 7.7% |
| 4c76j8h0 | Customer Risk from Real-Time Retail Electricity Pricing: Bill Volatility and Hedgability | 25 | 4 | 21 | 16.0% |
| 52f998s0 | Applying Psychology to Economic Policy Design: Using Incentive Preserving Rebates to Increase Acceptance of Critical Peak Electricity Pricing | 25 | 6 | 19 | 24.0% |
| 6qr7m8kh | Market Effects of Environmental Regulation: Coal, Railroads and the 1990 Clean Air Act | 25 | 7 | 18 | 28.0% |
| 8b2106nz | Wealth Transfers Among Large Customers from Implementing Real-Time Retail Electricity Pricing | 24 | 4 | 20 | 16.7% |
| 8qx3z0x7 | Variation of Distribution Factors with Loading | 24 | 12 | 12 | 50.0% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.