Center for the Study of Energy Markets
Parent: University of California Energy Institute
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for March through June, 2025
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3ws6r3j4 | The Market Value and Cost of Solar Photovoltaic Electricity Production | 308 | 32 | 276 | 10.4% |
| 11w8d6m4 | Dynamic Pricing, Advanced Metering, and Demand Response in Electricity Markets | 280 | 74 | 206 | 26.4% |
| 2dk5g982 | The Economic Impacts of Climate Change: Evidence from Agricultural Profits and Random Fluctuations in Weather | 206 | 12 | 194 | 5.8% |
| 4pd8s3h1 | Does Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Indiana | 206 | 19 | 187 | 9.2% |
| 4bf4j0gw | Doing Well By Doing Good? Green Office Buildings | 188 | 36 | 152 | 19.1% |
| 3d8252zp | Does Extending Daylight Saving Time Save Energy? Evidence from an Australian Experiment | 177 | 15 | 162 | 8.5% |
| 3td3n1x1 | Residential Customer Response to Real-time Pricing: The Anaheim Critical Peak Pricing Experiment | 132 | 22 | 110 | 16.7% |
| 74s774zj | Clearing the Air? The Effects of Gasoline Content Regulation on Air Quality | 122 | 10 | 112 | 8.2% |
| 2159m46p | Measuring Market Inefficiencies in California's Restructured Wholesale Electricity Market | 120 | 20 | 100 | 16.7% |
| 86m171mn | Evidence of a Shift in the Short-Run Price Elasticity of Gasoline Demand | 102 | 9 | 93 | 8.8% |
| 7vq1m8mq | Market Power in California's Gasoline Market | 97 | 7 | 90 | 7.2% |
| 6f1378jg | The Economic Effects of Vintage Differentiated Regulations: The Case of New Source Review | 92 | 54 | 38 | 58.7% |
| 9tk2c4s9 | Electricity Rate Structures and the Economics of Solar PV: Could Mandatory Time-of-Use Rates Undermine California’s Solar Photovoltaic Subsidies? | 90 | 11 | 79 | 12.2% |
| 0mx44472 | Speculative Trading and Market Performance: The Effect of Arbitrageurs on Efficiency and Market Power in the New York Electricity Market | 83 | 11 | 72 | 13.3% |
| 3sr1h8nc | Equity Effects of Increasing-Block Electricity Pricing | 78 | 18 | 60 | 23.1% |
| 53q5q8rs | Taxes and Trading versus Intensity Standards: Second-Best Environmental Policies with Incomplete Regulation (Leakage) or Market Power | 78 | 8 | 70 | 10.3% |
| 2k54m0zk | On the Efficiency of Competitive Electricity Markets With Time-Invariant Retail Prices | 75 | 3 | 72 | 4.0% |
| 9dt8n4w3 | When to Pollute, When to Abate? Intertemporal Permit Use in the Los Angeles NOx Market | 73 | 49 | 24 | 67.1% |
| 27r2k4nf | Explaining the Price of Voluntary Carbon Offsets | 71 | 15 | 56 | 21.1% |
| 09v4k44b | Towards a Sustainable Energy Balance: Progressive Efficiency and the Return of Energy Conservation | 69 | 6 | 63 | 8.7% |
| 5x5543dg | An Equilibrium Model of Investment in Restructured Electricity Markets | 69 | 39 | 30 | 56.5% |
| 8dv5c0t1 | Ownership Change, Incentives and Plant Efficiency: The Divestiture of U.S. Electric Generation Plants | 68 | 20 | 48 | 29.4% |
| 9241c68t | Market Structure and Competition: A Cross-Market Analysis of U.S. Electricity Deregulation | 68 | 14 | 54 | 20.6% |
| 7p0168sp | What Do Emissions Markets Deliver and to Whom? Evidence from Southern California’s NOx Trading Program | 66 | 10 | 56 | 15.2% |
| 34c206t9 | The Long-Run Efficiency of Real-Time Electricity Pricing | 64 | 9 | 55 | 14.1% |
| 7nm2f6sx | When it comes to Demand Response, is FERC its Own Worst Enemy? | 64 | 8 | 56 | 12.5% |
| 4cn02883 | Sacred Cars? Optimal Regulation of Stationary and Non-stationary Pollution Sources | 63 | 27 | 36 | 42.9% |
| 50f4d8mr | Investment under Regulatory Uncertainty: U.S. Electricity Generation Investment Since 1996 | 63 | 27 | 36 | 42.9% |
| 9s75171w | California's Electricity Crisis: A Market Apart? | 63 | 10 | 53 | 15.9% |
| 5sf4m6rr | Retail Policies and Competition in the Gasoline Industry | 62 | 9 | 53 | 14.5% |
| 6266b54f | Asymmetric Price Adjustment and Consumer Search: An Examination of the Retail Gasoline Market | 62 | 11 | 51 | 17.7% |
| 6dw241sv | Measuring Unilateral Market Power in Wholesale Electricity Markets: The California Market 1998 - 2000 | 60 | 6 | 54 | 10.0% |
| 9xz9r2gm | The Implications of a Gasoline Price Floor for the California Budget and Greenhouse Gas Emissions | 60 | 7 | 53 | 11.7% |
| 2c96w6ff | From Investor-owned Utility to Independent Power Producer | 59 | 13 | 46 | 22.0% |
| 0h90r7k2 | Building Out Alternative Fuel Retail Infrastructure: Government Fleet Spillovers in E85 | 56 | 13 | 43 | 23.2% |
| 7z47d08n | Greenhouse Gas Reductions Under Low Carbon Fuel Standards? | 56 | 5 | 51 | 8.9% |
| 54c0f88g | Emissions Trading, Electricity Industry Restructuring, and Investment in Pollution Abatement | 55 | 5 | 50 | 9.1% |
| 3g9504bb | The Implied Cost of Carbon Dioxide under the Cash for Clunkers Program | 54 | 9 | 45 | 16.7% |
| 9j05125d | Virtual Divestitures, Will They Make A Difference?: Cournot Competition, Options Markets and Efficiency | 54 | 30 | 24 | 55.6% |
| 9wp6969x | Is Real-Time Pricing Green?: The Environmental Impacts of Electricity Demand Variance | 54 | 6 | 48 | 11.1% |
| 1hj0983z | Demand-Side Management and Energy Efficiency Revisited | 53 | 10 | 43 | 18.9% |
| 62n6k1qx | The 'Make or Buy' Decision in U.S. Electricity Generation Investments | 53 | 27 | 26 | 50.9% |
| 65h8p4sb | Cournot Competition, Financial Option Markets, and Efficiency | 53 | 5 | 48 | 9.4% |
| 4vd3k3jt | The Length of Contracts and Collusion | 52 | 6 | 46 | 11.5% |
| 26k8h7v9 | Vertical Integration in Restructured Electricity Markets: Measuring Market Efficiency and Firm Conduct | 51 | 8 | 43 | 15.7% |
| 0128s4r3 | Lessons from International Experience with Electricity Market Monitoring | 50 | 5 | 45 | 10.0% |
| 09648358 | The Distributional and Environmental Effects of Time-Varying Prices in Competitive Electricity Markets | 50 | 2 | 48 | 4.0% |
| 0v38t8r8 | Valuing the Time-Varying Electricity Production of Solar Photovoltaic Cells | 50 | 6 | 44 | 12.0% |
| 1nn681tk | Climate Change, Mortality, and Adaptation: Evidence from Annual Fluctuations in Weather in the US | 50 | 6 | 44 | 12.0% |
| 2m41d45s | Do Americans Consume Too Little Natural Gas? An Empirical Test of Marginal Cost Pricing | 50 | 4 | 46 | 8.0% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.