Postprints from The Williams Institute

Parent: The Williams Institute

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for May through August, 2026

ItemTitleTotal requestsDownloadView-only%Dnld
9xs6g8xxLGBT Parenting in the United States3278024724.5%
6t44n67sAdolescents of the U.S. National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study: Male role models, gender role traits, and psychological adjustment3028022226.5%
3wf4t3q9Evidence of Persistent and Pervasive Workplace Discrimination Against LGBT People: The Need for Federal Legislation Prohibiting Discrimination and Providing for Equal Employment Benefits2937122224.2%
53x3r16jLGBT Identity: A Demographer’s Perspective23810213642.9%
6m97j8zcHIV Prevalence Rates Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Southern United States: Population-Based Estimates by Race/Ethnicity2375618123.6%
2cj0k29cLGBT Adult Immigrants in the United States2117014133.2%
8dk71277Same Sex and Different Sex Couples in the American Community Survey: 2005-20111944714724.2%
1rd935tmSocial Inclusion and the Value of Marriage Equality in Massachusetts and the Netherlands1846112333.2%
7f06z3svUS National Longitudinal Lesbian Family Study: Psychological Adjustment of 17-Year-Old Adolescents1665611033.7%
6b37s7kpBrief of Amici Curiae in United States v. Windsor and Hollingsworth v. Perry of National Women's Law Center, Williams Institute, and Women's Legal Groups159897056.0%
2nz8t6vxBrief of Amici Curiae in United States v. Windsor and Hollingsworth v. Perry of Gary J. Gates1453910626.9%
0hj853skEstimating the Economic Boost of Marriage Equality in Rhode Island1442911520.1%
8dj9k0h6Same-Sex Couples and Marriage: Model Legislation for Allowing Same-Sex Couples to Marry or All Couples to Form a Civil Union140509035.7%
7j08z94pThe Cost of Employment and Housing Discrimination against Transgender Residents of New York1393810127.3%
0842x56p“We’d Be Free”: Narratives of Life Without Homophobia, Racism, or Sexism129369327.9%
0gq3904zPublic Support for Marriage for Same-sex Couples by State128448434.4%
7sd3f251Economic Motives for Adopting LGBT-Related Workplace Policies (Updated)125329325.6%
61z7h2d6Estimating the Economic Boost of Marriage Equality in Illinois118417734.7%
4zd153qdEstimating the Economic Boost of Marriage Equality in Minnesota114565849.1%
5640q32gPublic Support for Marriage for Same-sex Couples by State112436938.4%
6133p8hpEstimating the Economic Boost of Marriage Equality in Delaware109496045.0%
7bv1b0s5Estimating the Economic Boost of Marriage Equality in Minnesota99287128.3%
7n38m7ndSeparate and Not Equal: Bi-National Same–Sex Couples87246327.6%
9xm6f7nwAdministrative Impact of Adding Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity to Texas’s Employment Non-Discrimination Law83335039.8%
2sc726gdHIV Prevalence Rates Among Men Who Have Sex with Men in the Southern United States: Population-Based Estimates by Race/Ethnicity79324740.5%
98d2n387The Potential Impact of a Strict Voter Identification Law on Transgender Voters in North Carolina64273742.2%
44p0w3ndHIV Discrimination in Dental Care: Results of a Testing Study in Los Angeles Study61184329.5%

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.