Open Access Policy Deposits

Parent: Department of Linguistics

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for February through May, 2025

ItemTitleTotal requestsDownloadView-only%Dnld
05b2s4wgThe empirical base of linguistics: Grammaticality judgments and linguistic methodology1732514814.5%
0n76t3hnWPP, No.111: Glottal articulations of phonation contrasts and their acoustic and perceptual consequences100128812.0%
7f26m713Challenges for a theory of islands: A broader perspective on Ambridge, Pine, and Lieven95108510.5%
3fq7x9mbVocal fold vibratory patterns in tense versus lax phonation contrasts93256826.9%
04r5q6qnWPP, No. 105: Linguistic Voice Quality913883.3%
9pn2b9qmMeasures of the glottal source spectrum.81136816.0%
1xn120qkWhen is a Verb not a Verb?73136017.8%
2mw9c40qNon-literal language processing is jointly supported by the language and theory of mind networks: Evidence from a novel meta-analytic fMRI approach.665617.6%
88x529wrA comparison of informal and formal acceptability judgments using a random sample from Linguistic Inquiry 2001–201066273940.9%
7x39t5hgThree levels of the symbolosphere62214133.9%
6mt3d01xSemantic projection recovers rich human knowledge of multiple object features from word embeddings.602583.3%
9xx930j1WPP, No. 108: Phonation Contrasts Across Languages60114918.3%
0r69t4trWPP, No. 103: Linguistic Phonetics in the UCLA Phonetics Lab58114719.0%
60v8v517Dependent-case assignment could be AGREE5894915.5%
9n26b70jInformation Structure Preferences in Focus-Sensitive Ellipsis: How Defaults Persist58124620.7%
4qs31528WPP, No. 108: Perception of pitch location within a speaker’s own range: fundamental frequency, voice quality and speaker sex5784914.0%
8m31s5n6Functional characterization of the language network of polyglots and hyperpolyglots with precision fMRI.56164028.6%
3987s5jjDifferential Tracking of Linguistic vs. Mental State Content in Naturalistic Stimuli by Language and Theory of Mind (ToM) Brain Networks.5574812.7%
52g5f2dqMore on (the Lack of) Reconstruction in English Tough-Constructions5584714.5%
4mt0s60wMeasuring vocal quality with speech synthesis.54233142.6%
8dr06327Perception of aperiodicity in pathological voice54183633.3%
0n100842Grammar and the use of data5364711.3%
5dp6b6s4Not all reconstruction effects are syntactic52173532.7%
7qw6m187Watching videos of a drawing hand improves students understanding of the normal probability distribution.52114121.2%
8rv9t589WPP, No. 106: Effects of Initial Position versus Prominence in English48163233.3%
92d624qq“Narten formations” versus “Narten roots”4874114.6%
31p920zfIs Second Language Attrition Inevitable After Instruction Ends? An Exploratory Longitudinal Study of Advanced Instructed Second Language Users473446.4%
6tg5z1jkThe polysemy of measurement47281959.6%
29s5h9w3Information conveyed by voice qualitya)46212545.7%
90d6532fWPP, No. 104: Intonational Phonology of Seoul Korean Revisited461452.2%
1gs6h5k7WPP, No. 108: The acoustic consequences of phonation and tone interactions in Jalapa Mazatec4554011.1%
1nh5v8j1Towards understanding speaker discrimination abilities in humans and machines for text-independent short utterances of different speech styles.452434.4%
5bc7k7xdWPP, No.110: Perception of spectral slopes and tone identification in White Hmong4563913.3%
9c7436cnYoung infants’ discrimination of subtle phonetic contrasts451442.2%
0hc673msSynchronic and diachronic microvariation in English do442424.5%
61f416jpfMRI reveals language-specific predictive coding during naturalistic sentence comprehension4473715.9%
5tj8f292Against some approaches to long-distance agreement without AGREE4383518.6%
85p5t52cThe Language Network Reliably “Tracks” Naturalistic Meaningful Nonverbal Stimuli4253711.9%
98j5s1r7Keep it local (and final): Remnant preferences in “let alone” ellipsis42103223.8%
0xd5n4gkHigh-toned [il] in Korean: Phonetics, intonational phonology, and sound change41132831.7%
3zk503xrLong-term memory for unfamiliar voices.41162539.0%
4gk6008pWPP, No. 105: Optical Cues to the Visual Perception of Lexical and Phrasal Stress in English413387.3%
4kz9d7v0No evidence for differences among language regions in their temporal receptive windows414379.8%
5sv727q6WPP, No. 103: Phonetic Encoding of Prosodic Structure4153612.2%
0h9362zfValidating a psychoacoustic model of voice quality.40132732.5%
1gh6x943WPP, No. 108: Comparison of speaking fundamental frequency in English and Mandarin3853313.2%
3xk61586Cue-shifting between acoustic cues: Evidence for directional asymmetry38162242.1%
46v4j8dtProbabilistic atlas for the language network based on precision fMRI data from >800 individuals382365.3%
85t8m8p7The everyday speech environments of preschoolers with and without cochlear implants.382365.3%
89r0w94jReconceptualizing VOT: Further contributions to marking 50 years of research on voice onset time380380.0%

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.