Presentations and Posters
Parent: UC San Diego Library
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for April through July, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3f6053js | An Actionable Guide to Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) in Scholarly Communication | 69 | 15 | 54 | 21.7% |
| 1c25d365 | Tell Us How UC It: Social Impact through Digital Initiative Projects | 48 | 8 | 40 | 16.7% |
| 0186c8g9 | Inclusive Team Visioning: Building the Leadership Muscles to Get Beyond the Groan Zone | 44 | 11 | 33 | 25.0% |
| 9997r4hw | Tell Us How UC It: Thinking Critically through a Living Archive for Student Activism | 42 | 5 | 37 | 11.9% |
| 3q77h105 | Safeguard Plan for E-resources : Specifying Licensing Terms for Perpetual Accessand Exploring Means of Data Preservation | 41 | 9 | 32 | 22.0% |
| 05h9s3t0 | Center for Music Experiment: Creating a Digital Collection | 37 | 4 | 33 | 10.8% |
| 0q53r0rg | Building Users’ Search Skills for Systematic Reviews: Development of Self-Directed Learning Through Qualitative Synthesis of Guidelines | 36 | 11 | 25 | 30.6% |
| 3n6296kn | Patrolling the Past: Bringing the Papua New Guinea Colonial-Era Reports into the Digital Realm | 36 | 24 | 12 | 66.7% |
| 1kz5q7sd | And You May Ask Yourself, ‘Well… How Did I Get Here?’: Reflections on the Evolution of a Library Diversity Committee | 34 | 7 | 27 | 20.6% |
| 4xs891fb | Assessing Reference Services Using the READ Scale (Reference Effort Assessment Data) | 29 | 5 | 24 | 17.2% |
| 2bf7n6tp | DLF Project Managers Group - Project Portfolio Management Demo | 28 | 11 | 17 | 39.3% |
| 8nk439sz | Intellectual Property Legislation and Litigation Update: Copyright Claims Board / Copyright and AI | 26 | 12 | 14 | 46.2% |
| 62h5c97k | Lose Your Likert Scales | 25 | 10 | 15 | 40.0% |
| 8tz798pn | Exploring the (de)Colonial Gaze through Archival Analysis and Teaching | 25 | 6 | 19 | 24.0% |
| 05m3r18x | Strategies to Make Library Resources Discoverable | 24 | 3 | 21 | 12.5% |
| 0hc172sp | Introduction to Electronic Resources and Remote Access Issues | 24 | 10 | 14 | 41.7% |
| 2n45g3b9 | Transcribing Oral Histories for Race and Oral History, Spring 19 | 24 | 10 | 14 | 41.7% |
| 3xc007br | Open Educational Resource Program Development: A View from Two Institutions | 24 | 12 | 12 | 50.0% |
| 5qf9h2k1 | Sharing Metadata: Building Collections and Communities | 24 | 6 | 18 | 25.0% |
| 36n3z0jd | Gone Digital | 23 | 9 | 14 | 39.1% |
| 4hg949dt | Identifying ECIP Partner Needs: Survey Results on ECIP Set-Up | 22 | 7 | 15 | 31.8% |
| 8q83276r | Inclusive Places in Online Spaces: Creating Inclusive Online Library Tutorials | 22 | 10 | 12 | 45.5% |
| 142832hf | Towards Interoperable and Equitable Scholarly Communications Ecosystems: Values-based Questions to Ask Infrastructure Providers | 20 | 7 | 13 | 35.0% |
| 4cn0868c | Chemical Information Across San Diego County: A Community College and University Library Collaboration for an Independent Synthesis Project | 20 | 8 | 12 | 40.0% |
| 720695n1 | Singsings and Storytelling: Digitizing Audio Recordings | 20 | 9 | 11 | 45.0% |
| 83j187qf | BIBCO/ECIP at UC San Diego Library: BIBCO new member experience | 20 | 8 | 12 | 40.0% |
| 9259k5d8 | Partnering Local to Create Statewide Impact : CalPIRG Students and Librarians Align to Motivate Action | 20 | 9 | 11 | 45.0% |
| 16q815k7 | Developing a Sustainable Online Video Instructional Program through Lean Production Values and Assessment | 19 | 8 | 11 | 42.1% |
| 5q12k8mh | Electronic Resource Management Systems: Choosing and Implementing an ERMS | 19 | 1 | 18 | 5.3% |
| 6vr0c2pq | #staywoke: Using living archives to build bridges to the future by reflecting on our past | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0.0% |
| 1cc6k97p | Library Services to the Masses When No One Knows What We Do | 18 | 0 | 18 | 0.0% |
| 321420ht | Does an open access publication have to cost so much? A study of departmental publication patters in order to recommend high quality - low cost alternative open access journals. | 18 | 10 | 8 | 55.6% |
| 5ms2t93b | Open Access Publishing: Community over Commercialization | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0.0% |
| 8qd2t59w | The Pornographic Digital Divide: Libraries and Forbidden Knowledge | 17 | 0 | 17 | 0.0% |
| 7738x84p | Unlocking the Value of the Monograph: 6400 Book Pairs Speak | 16 | 2 | 14 | 12.5% |
| 8hn5d40q | So What Do They Ask? Analyzing the Content of Digital Reference Transactions | 16 | 6 | 10 | 37.5% |
| 98m0j9vb | Increasing Access to Information through Journal Club Participation | 16 | 4 | 12 | 25.0% |
| 9vn1w64v | Who, What, Where: Gathering and Interpreting User Data | 16 | 2 | 14 | 12.5% |
| 1497d1gh | All Teh Metadatas Re-Revisited | 15 | 3 | 12 | 20.0% |
| 1nn9f7h0 | Don’t forget the qualitative: Including focus groups in the collection assessment process | 15 | 6 | 9 | 40.0% |
| 9g62m9k2 | Outreaching - A Critical Junction where Librarians and the Academic Programs Meet | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0.0% |
| 2g88p9x0 | EdTech: Ensuring the "Ed" Comes Before "Tech" Through Online Tutorial Assessment and Evaluation | 14 | 0 | 14 | 0.0% |
| 10347061 | Building Community among Staff through Engagement and Recognition | 13 | 0 | 13 | 0.0% |
| 4xg6w484 | International ILL: A Global Perspective on Resource Sharing | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% |
| 7p06h7k5 | Using Card-Sorting to Arrange Menu Items on an Academic Library Homepage | 13 | 3 | 10 | 23.1% |
| 9pk4p3rg | Bringing Information Literacy (IL) into the First-Year College Science Curriculum: Expanding a Faculty/Librarian Partnership to Develop Chemical IL Modules for Freshmen Lecture and Laboratory Courses | 13 | 4 | 9 | 30.8% |
| 22b5z9wm | “Why Metadata? Why Me? Why Now?” | 12 | 3 | 9 | 25.0% |
| 47k7b1g8 | Networking with Clinical Nurses: Fusing Magnet & Organizational Missions | 12 | 4 | 8 | 33.3% |
| 5cq0d1bd | Walk It Off: Assessing Use of WalkStations in the Library | 12 | 0 | 12 | 0.0% |
| 9w52g066 | Rights & Permissions in Real Life, the UCSD Experience | 12 | 1 | 11 | 8.3% |
Disclaimer: due to the evolving nature of the web traffic we receive and the methods we use to collate it, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision.