Skip to main content
eScholarship
Open Access Publications from the University of California

Pediatric Patients with Behavioral Emergencies: Who’s Coming in and What Happens While They’re Here?

Creative Commons 'BY' version 4.0 license
Abstract

Introduction: Children and adolescents evaluated in the emergency department (ED) represent a vulnerable population, especially when presenting for psychiatric symptoms. For these patients the ED environment may be stressful and lacking in needed resources. Data describing children seen within the ED are currently limited; this study aims to describe the pediatric patient population treated for mental health concerns within one ED, which may promote better-tailored treatment and support resources in the future.

Methods: The study describes 339 visits generated over two months in 2017 at LAC+USC Medical Center. We reviewed charts to determine each child’s stated age and gender, as well as whether the patient belonged to one or more vulnerable subpopulations. The factors of interest included involvement with the social services and legal systems, history of psychological trauma, diagnoses of post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and whether the patient required a “behavioral code” during his or her visit.

Results: The study determined that 76.1% of the charts included at least one risk factor assessed during our review. Males were more likely than females to present by the age of 11, while the opposite was true for patients age 12-17. We also determined that 38% of patients had been involved with child protective services, or a regional center (system for individuals with developmental disabilities), or the juvenile justice system, and that 5.6% were involved with multiple systems. Two hundred twenty-five patients had experienced psychological trauma, with 30 patients carrying an official diagnosis of PTSD. Of behavior codes called, 23% were for ASD patients, with these patients being far more likely to display dangerous behaviors in the ED compared with neurotypical children.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that a majority of children evaluated in our ED for psychiatric concerns also belonged to at least one vulnerable subpopulation. Especially striking was that behavioral codes were far more likely to be called for ASD patients than neurotypical patients, implying that EDs that work with this population may benefit from extra training in preventing and managing agitated behavior in children with ASD.

Main Content
For improved accessibility of PDF content, download the file to your device.
Current View