UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report

Parent: Department of Linguistics

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for May through August, 2026

ItemTitleTotal requestsDownloadView-only%Dnld
2q6685k5Phonetics and Phonology of Urhobo55325330045.8%
2fc6x1phSpeaker Normalization in Speech Perception51812139723.4%
16c753jzVocal Tract Length Normalization47511436124.0%
5k6795751.5 Generation Korean Americans: Consonant and Vowel Production of Two Late Childhood Arrivals46014831232.2%
6f88p78mStandard Georgian4579835921.4%
2m45t9xjBantu Tone Overview45217427838.5%
7f6332bhThe Production and Perception of a Lesbian Speech Style4478536219.0%
3p19w08rJust Put Your Lips Together and Blow? The Whistled Fricatives of Southern Bantu44421822649.1%
4w84m8k4A Survey of English Vowel Spaces of Asian American Californians43411731727.0%
2zn6n546Universals in Phonology43122220951.5%
67h2d4frArticulatory Uniformity Through Articulatory Reuse: insights from an Ultrasound Study of Sūzhōu Chinese40528412170.1%
1sr5f98xTone: Is it Different?40310130225.1%
4kp306rxTurbulence & Phonology3789628225.4%
71h8p4gzThe Representation of Tone3395828117.1%
7v40368sThe Effects of Singing on Speech in Geriatric Voice: An Acoustic Study30812718141.2%
0dq5t184Morphology, Irregularity, and Bantu Frication: The Case of Lulamogi3005724319.0%
33k93506Kejom (Babanki)28814514350.3%
0p18z2s3Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics, 3rd Edition -- Chapter 52849718734.2%
7q81c3rgNasal Vowel Patterns in West Africa2828220029.1%
93g1j49tVOT merger and f0 contrast in Heritage Korean in California27910417537.3%
97d2q41zWord prosody II: Tone systems27313014347.6%
3hr9r9cdWhat is Phonological Typology?27113913251.3%
6q23n11qA Longitudinal Acoustic Study of Two Transgender Women on YouTube2628517732.4%
2415w16pCompensation for Coarticulation of Fricative-stop Clusters as Mediated by Lexical and Temporal Effects2541896574.4%
796415rpThe Fall and Rise of Vowel Length in Bantu2546319124.8%
11390154Word-prosodic Typology25014210856.8%
78r2h52gHigh Vowel Fricativization and Chain Shift2499915039.8%
3xp899c0Articulatory patterns in contrasting nasal-stop sequences in Panãra2487717131.0%
8587g0jgPhonetic Bias in Sound Change24610114541.1%
19n0c4m4Correlating Complexity: A Typological Approach2401439759.6%
7gq1s5n4Phonetic Accommodation to Non-Native English Speech2367616032.2%
6fk2m1swGradient phonemic contrast in Nanjing Mandarin2304418619.1%
47p2w2p0How Autosegmental is Phonology?2271428562.6%
1t692652On Reconstructing Tone in Proto-Niger-Congo2217614534.4%
4r49g6qxBilabial and Labio-dental Fricatives in Ewe2214917222.2%
8wp244gcRevisiting f0 Range Production in Japanese-English Simultaneous Bilinguals2206415629.1%
1j22g02mHolistic Lexical Storage: Coarticulatory Evidence from Child Speech2145316124.8%
1hw2719nStrengthening, Weakening and Variability: The Articulatory Correlates of Hypo- and Hyper-articulation in the Production of English Dental Fricatives2117613536.0%
2pm9c9sqAutomated Measurement of Vowel Formants in the Buckeye Corpus2069111544.2%
28b3c9fxHead correction of point tracking data2057912638.5%
4hb059t7How (not) to do Phonological Typology: The Case of Pitch-accent2059011543.9%
3cm3w6ckIssues of Phonological Complexity: Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Syllable Structures, Segment Inventories and Tone Contrasts2047413036.3%
3dm6f40nProsodic asymmetries in nominal vs. verbal phrases in Bantu2038911443.8%
9qg061pfA Case for Parallelism: Reduplication-repair Interaction in Maragoli2036513832.0%
3ht3w95jSynchronic vs. Diachronic Naturalness: Hyman & Schuh (1974) revisited2025814428.7%
8kf3z3s9Resonance in an Exemplar-based Lexicon: The Emergence of Social Identity and Phonology2017312836.3%
9h18t4rzPaguettes & Bastries: Novice French Learners Show Shifts in Native Phoneme Boundaries1991178258.8%
28z3k137Unearthing the Roots: Ao and Proto-Tibeto-Burman -- The Rimes1966712934.2%
95m171v6Correlating Phonological Complexity: Data and Validation1957012535.9%
7mn4379nIndividual differences in speech production: What is "phonetic substance"?1945913530.4%

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.