UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report

eScholarship stats: History by Item for June through September, 2026

Item	Title	Total requests	2026-09	2026-08	2026-07	2026-06
2q6685k5	Phonetics and Phonology of Urhobo	594	159	270	60	105
4w84m8k4	A Survey of English Vowel Spaces of Asian American Californians	509	169	143	78	119
6f88p78m	Standard Georgian	467	119	173	54	121
2zn6n546	Universals in Phonology	428	116	151	77	84
2fc6x1ph	Speaker Normalization in Speech Perception	411	68	142	89	112
4kp306rx	Turbulence & Phonology	394	104	158	69	63
2m45t9xj	Bantu Tone Overview	392	107	155	58	72
5k679575	1.5 Generation Korean Americans: Consonant and Vowel Production of Two Late Childhood Arrivals	370	57	114	76	123
1sr5f98x	Tone: Is it Different?	366	96	129	66	75
7f6332bh	The Production and Perception of a Lesbian Speech Style	362	57	96	92	117
16c753jz	Vocal Tract Length Normalization	355	77	73	43	162
71h8p4gz	The Representation of Tone	325	50	115	114	46
67h2d4fr	Articulatory Uniformity Through Articulatory Reuse: insights from an Ultrasound Study of Sūzhōu Chinese	309	55	75	74	105
0dq5t184	Morphology, Irregularity, and Bantu Frication: The Case of Lulamogi	303	73	154	43	33
0p18z2s3	Acoustic and Auditory Phonetics, 3rd Edition -- Chapter 5	296	103	81	55	57
2pm9c9sq	Automated Measurement of Vowel Formants in the Buckeye Corpus	270	97	121	33	19
11390154	Word-prosodic Typology	265	69	95	68	33
93g1j49t	VOT merger and f0 contrast in Heritage Korean in California	252	56	92	68	36
8587g0jg	Phonetic Bias in Sound Change	247	84	68	38	57
6q23n11q	A Longitudinal Acoustic Study of Two Transgender Women on YouTube	243	60	69	42	72
97d2q41z	Word prosody II: Tone systems	243	54	72	50	67
33k93506	Kejom (Babanki)	239	52	76	40	71
8wp244gc	Revisiting f0 Range Production in Japanese-English Simultaneous Bilinguals	234	61	81	48	44
7q81c3rg	Nasal Vowel Patterns in West Africa	232	61	54	51	66
796415rp	The Fall and Rise of Vowel Length in Bantu	231	71	48	24	88
3cm3w6ck	Issues of Phonological Complexity: Statistical Analysis of the Relationship Between Syllable Structures, Segment Inventories and Tone Contrasts	229	96	55	34	44
7v40368s	The Effects of Singing on Speech in Geriatric Voice: An Acoustic Study	226	23	40	32	131
3hr9r9cd	What is Phonological Typology?	221	49	56	59	57
47p2w2p0	How Autosegmental is Phonology?	221	57	63	56	45
3p19w08r	Just Put Your Lips Together and Blow? The Whistled Fricatives of Southern Bantu	218	55	47	45	71
2ps07513	Ilse Lehiste	216	132	38	16	30
19n0c4m4	Correlating Complexity: A Typological Approach	208	41	68	48	51
4hb059t7	How (not) to do Phonological Typology: The Case of Pitch-accent	206	48	79	47	32
2415w16p	Compensation for Coarticulation of Fricative-stop Clusters as Mediated by Lexical and Temporal Effects	195	31	47	41	76
5m77t155	Phonetic Explanations for Sound Patterns: Implications for Grammars of Competence	193	52	47	40	54
9b48r86x	Does Gokana Really Have No Syllables? (Or: What's So Great About Being Universal?)	192	72	56	29	35
6fk2m1sw	Gradient phonemic contrast in Nanjing Mandarin	189	49	73	21	46
7gq1s5n4	Phonetic Accommodation to Non-Native English Speech	189	35	59	39	56
4r49g6qx	Bilabial and Labio-dental Fricatives in Ewe	186	33	36	41	76
9n00618c	Articulatory Variation of the Alveolar Tap and Implications for Sound Change	184	81	31	34	38
8kf3z3s9	Resonance in an Exemplar-based Lexicon: The Emergence of Social Identity and Phonology	183	42	53	37	51
1hw2719n	Strengthening, Weakening and Variability: The Articulatory Correlates of Hypo- and Hyper-articulation in the Production of English Dental Fricatives	182	52	47	39	44
78r2h52g	High Vowel Fricativization and Chain Shift	181	44	45	38	54
76n6t3hq	Expressive Alliteration in Mon and Khmer	178	46	54	31	47
1hs7h769	Closure Duration and VOT of Word-initial Voiceless Plosives in English in Spontaneous Connected Speech	173	37	55	23	58
3xp899c0	Articulatory patterns in contrasting nasal-stop sequences in Panãra	173	30	49	32	62
4qr2h33t	Amazonia and the Typology of Tone Systems	172	41	56	26	49
28z3k137	Unearthing the Roots: Ao and Proto-Tibeto-Burman -- The Rimes	165	37	67	29	32
3ht3w95j	Synchronic vs. Diachronic Naturalness: Hyman & Schuh (1974) revisited	163	51	46	21	45
5p6693q0	Production of Phonetic and Phonological Contrast by Heritage Speakers of Mandarin	162	48	43	32	39

Top

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.