California Digital Library
Parent: UC Office of the President
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for March through June, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9p9863nc | The ARK Identifier Scheme | 593 | 35 | 558 | 5.9% |
| 2mw6v93b | Dash: Improving Community Repositories for Better Data Sharing | 452 | 6 | 446 | 1.3% |
| 1wm2b563 | Methods to Tame the Madness: A Practitioner’s Guide to User Assessment Techniques for Online Finding Aid and Website Design | 382 | 2 | 380 | 0.5% |
| 1dt1v1pc | DataUp: Further Development and Community Building | 355 | 2 | 353 | 0.6% |
| 5b1044cd | “The Links in the Chain”: Connecting Undergraduates with Primary Source Materials at the University of California | 354 | 3 | 351 | 0.8% |
| 9jw4964t | Practices, Trends, and Recommendations in Technical Appendix Usage for Selected Data-Intensive Disciplines | 338 | 7 | 331 | 2.1% |
| 51r4q7kw | Supporting research data mangement at the University of California | 309 | 6 | 303 | 1.9% |
| 0bj150gj | Outcomes, Questions, and Answers: “The Right to Deposit (R2D) Uniform guidance to ensure author compliance and public access” | 287 | 28 | 259 | 9.8% |
| 3tv1m5xj | Summary of Research: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 248 | 64 | 184 | 25.8% |
| 7tf5q7n3 | Primer on Data Management: What you always wanted to know | 246 | 52 | 194 | 21.1% |
| 37t0658s | Integrating Multiple Platforms with OpenID Connect, A Shared Authentication Service | 183 | 4 | 179 | 2.2% |
| 94f35801 | Big data and the future of ecology | 159 | 104 | 55 | 65.4% |
| 5sp13112 | Finding Aid Aggregation at a Crossroads | 131 | 41 | 90 | 31.3% |
| 7hn3m08f | User Interviews: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 115 | 20 | 95 | 17.4% |
| 90k6w2wf | EAD Analysis: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 113 | 11 | 102 | 9.7% |
| 0kd7d5m0 | Increasing discovery of archives: A project to provide better pathways to archival records in cultural heritage collections | 100 | 22 | 78 | 22.0% |
| 0wf3j9cw | Significant Properties, Authenticity, Provenance, Representation Information and OAIS Information | 95 | 23 | 72 | 24.2% |
| 5qp9z6tb | Pop-up Survey: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 93 | 7 | 86 | 7.5% |
| 81s9129f | Focus Group Interviews: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 91 | 11 | 80 | 12.1% |
| 73m910w8 | Ten persistent myths about persistent identifiers | 86 | 16 | 70 | 18.6% |
| 7d3465vg | Digital Materiality: Preserving Access to Computers as Complete Environments | 85 | 12 | 73 | 14.1% |
| 2zm9x47c | Persistence statements: describing digital stickiness | 74 | 11 | 63 | 14.9% |
| 8089m1v1 | Towards a Methodology for Software Preservation | 67 | 8 | 59 | 11.9% |
| 8vh1k54f | UC HathiTrust ETAS Assessment - Summative Report to CoUL | 63 | 10 | 53 | 15.9% |
| 5v75k1k6 | DEI Efforts Across GLAM Organizations: A Report by the GLAM Diversity Subgroup of the DLF Committee for Equity and Inclusion. | 59 | 0 | 59 | 0.0% |
| 5xm3v98h | Preserving the Digital Memory of the Government of Canada: Influence and Collaboration with Records Creators | 55 | 3 | 52 | 5.5% |
| 2gs3p6jx | Memento Mundi: Are Virtual Worlds History? | 51 | 7 | 44 | 13.7% |
| 4vr6n902 | UC Libraries Academic e-Book Usage Survey | 49 | 7 | 42 | 14.3% |
| 9wx8337z | “Make it so”: Sustainable, Academy-Owned Publishing Infrastructure with CDL, Michigan, & Janeway | 48 | 6 | 42 | 12.5% |
| 3g64n275 | Toward a National Archival Finding Aid Network - From Planning Initiative to Project and Program: An Action Plan | 43 | 3 | 40 | 7.0% |
| 0s38n5w4 | Integrating Metadata Standards to Support Long-Term Preservation of Digital Assets: Developing Best Practices for Expressing Preservation Metadata in a Container Format | 41 | 6 | 35 | 14.6% |
| 7sk6659n | Digital Archeology: Recovering Digital Objects from Audio Waveforms | 39 | 5 | 34 | 12.8% |
| 4d09c0bb | Cost Model for Digital Curation: Cost of Digital Migration | 37 | 2 | 35 | 5.4% |
| 08s7w2fd | Advancing Scholarship through Digital Critical Editions: Mark Twain Project Online | 34 | 6 | 28 | 17.6% |
| 38g232wc | Distributed Digital Preservation: Technical, Sustainability, and Organizational Developments | 34 | 17 | 17 | 50.0% |
| 6bt4v3zs | The Human Face of Digital Preservation: Organizational and Staff Challenges, and Initiatives at the Bibliothèque nationale de France | 34 | 6 | 28 | 17.6% |
| 6r03h784 | isCitedBy: A Metadata Scheme for DataCite | 34 | 10 | 24 | 29.4% |
| 53z897zb | Born Broken: Fonts and Information Loss in Legacy Digital Documents | 33 | 5 | 28 | 15.2% |
| 5313h6k9 | An Emergent Micro-Services Approach to Digital Curation Infrastructure | 27 | 4 | 23 | 14.8% |
| 70q7f8kc | Tools for Preservation and Use of Complex and Diverse Digital Resources | 27 | 8 | 19 | 29.6% |
| 7w2390pj | Into the Archive: Potential and Limits of Standardizing the Ingest | 27 | 3 | 24 | 11.1% |
| 8dd2m5qw | Are You Ready? Assessing Whether Organisations are Prepared for Digital Preservation | 26 | 4 | 22 | 15.4% |
| 0wd3f1x4 | Curation is Not a Place: Post-Custodial Stewardship for a Do-It-Yourself World | 24 | 0 | 24 | 0.0% |
| 7zs156mb | ArchivePress: A Really Simple Solution to Archiving Blog Content | 24 | 6 | 18 | 25.0% |
| 86p3x8hw | Supporting Research Data Management at the University of California | 24 | 1 | 23 | 4.2% |
| 038225mj | Securing the Future of Federal Research: Mirroring Data.gov as a Vital Scholarly Resource | 23 | 0 | 23 | 0.0% |
| 89d4x6dj | Preservation in a dynamic environment: A librarian’s perspe | 22 | 0 | 22 | 0.0% |
| 9tw130cc | Mainstreaming Preservation through Slicing and Dicing of Digital Repositories: Investigating Alternative Service and Resource Options for ContextMiner Using Data Grid Technology | 22 | 3 | 19 | 13.6% |
| 9vb753xd | Towards Support for Long-Term Digital Preservation in Product Life Cycle Management | 22 | 4 | 18 | 18.2% |
| 8jf067f6 | Novel Workflows for Abstract Handling of Complex Interaction Processes in Digital Preservation | 21 | 4 | 17 | 19.0% |
Disclaimer: due to the evolving nature of the web traffic we receive and the methods we use to collate it, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision.