California Digital Library
Parent: UC Office of the President
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for May through August, 2026
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 9p9863nc | The ARK Identifier Scheme | 726 | 109 | 617 | 15.0% |
| 5sp13112 | Finding Aid Aggregation at a Crossroads | 530 | 305 | 225 | 57.5% |
| 7tf5q7n3 | Primer on Data Management: What you always wanted to know | 393 | 107 | 286 | 27.2% |
| 6xr6q38m | Building a National Finding Aid Network: Final Report | 366 | 100 | 266 | 27.3% |
| 7d3465vg | Digital Materiality: Preserving Access to Computers as Complete Environments | 359 | 74 | 285 | 20.6% |
| 94f35801 | Big data and the future of ecology | 357 | 192 | 165 | 53.8% |
| 90k6w2wf | EAD Analysis: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 311 | 158 | 153 | 50.8% |
| 08s7w2fd | Advancing Scholarship through Digital Critical Editions: Mark Twain Project Online | 298 | 51 | 247 | 17.1% |
| 9450t5m9 | Project LEND Service Plan | 297 | 116 | 181 | 39.1% |
| 0wf3j9cw | Significant Properties, Authenticity, Provenance, Representation Information and OAIS Information | 278 | 79 | 199 | 28.4% |
| 0bj150gj | Outcomes, Questions, and Answers: “The Right to Deposit (R2D) Uniform guidance to ensure author compliance and public access” | 274 | 47 | 227 | 17.2% |
| 81s9129f | Focus Group Interviews: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 270 | 77 | 193 | 28.5% |
| 8vh1k54f | UC HathiTrust ETAS Assessment - Summative Report to CoUL | 270 | 64 | 206 | 23.7% |
| 5xm3v98h | Preserving the Digital Memory of the Government of Canada: Influence and Collaboration with Records Creators | 262 | 43 | 219 | 16.4% |
| 73m910w8 | Ten persistent myths about persistent identifiers | 262 | 38 | 224 | 14.5% |
| 7hn3m08f | User Interviews: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 260 | 85 | 175 | 32.7% |
| 3tv1m5xj | Summary of Research: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 245 | 67 | 178 | 27.3% |
| 5qp9z6tb | Pop-up Survey: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 245 | 59 | 186 | 24.1% |
| 0kd7d5m0 | Increasing discovery of archives: A project to provide better pathways to archival records in cultural heritage collections | 241 | 53 | 188 | 22.0% |
| 3hz2t5jm | Matching Algorithms Task Force Final Report | 239 | 50 | 189 | 20.9% |
| 53z897zb | Born Broken: Fonts and Information Loss in Legacy Digital Documents | 232 | 97 | 135 | 41.8% |
| 34m053gb | Research Information at California Digital Library | 231 | 48 | 183 | 20.8% |
| 2zm9x47c | Persistence statements: describing digital stickiness | 229 | 53 | 176 | 23.1% |
| 9wx8337z | “Make it so”: Sustainable, Academy-Owned Publishing Infrastructure with CDL, Michigan, & Janeway | 223 | 47 | 176 | 21.1% |
| 3g64n275 | Toward a National Archival Finding Aid Network - From Planning Initiative to Project and Program: An Action Plan | 208 | 51 | 157 | 24.5% |
| 0s38n5w4 | Integrating Metadata Standards to Support Long-Term Preservation of Digital Assets: Developing Best Practices for Expressing Preservation Metadata in a Container Format | 201 | 61 | 140 | 30.3% |
| 12p437bd | Implementing Metadata that Guides Digital Preservation Services | 200 | 108 | 92 | 54.0% |
| 4vr6n902 | UC Libraries Academic e-Book Usage Survey | 188 | 41 | 147 | 21.8% |
| 6bt4v3zs | The Human Face of Digital Preservation: Organizational and Staff Challenges, and Initiatives at the Bibliothèque nationale de France | 179 | 37 | 142 | 20.7% |
| 0t2075qc | Chronopolis: Preserving our Digital Heritage | 178 | 59 | 119 | 33.1% |
| 8kj892xg | Implementing DEIA Training for Editors in a Library Publishing Program | 178 | 51 | 127 | 28.7% |
| 9tw130cc | Mainstreaming Preservation through Slicing and Dicing of Digital Repositories: Investigating Alternative Service and Resource Options for ContextMiner Using Data Grid Technology | 178 | 44 | 134 | 24.7% |
| 2gs3p6jx | Memento Mundi: Are Virtual Worlds History? | 176 | 58 | 118 | 33.0% |
| 11n4t7rk | The National Digital Stewardship Alliance Charter: Enabling Collaboration to Achieve National Digital Preservation | 173 | 45 | 128 | 26.0% |
| 37t0658s | Integrating Multiple Platforms with OpenID Connect, A Shared Authentication Service | 173 | 52 | 121 | 30.1% |
| 5313h6k9 | An Emergent Micro-Services Approach to Digital Curation Infrastructure | 166 | 51 | 115 | 30.7% |
| 9kf081vf | Making Data Count: A Data Metrics Pilot Project | 164 | 40 | 124 | 24.4% |
| 4d09c0bb | Cost Model for Digital Curation: Cost of Digital Migration | 161 | 51 | 110 | 31.7% |
| 14h35961 | Curating Scientific Research Data for the Long Term: A Preservation Analysis Method in Context | 152 | 61 | 91 | 40.1% |
| 8089m1v1 | Towards a Methodology for Software Preservation | 152 | 37 | 115 | 24.3% |
| 9jw4964t | Practices, Trends, and Recommendations in Technical Appendix Usage for Selected Data-Intensive Disciplines | 152 | 34 | 118 | 22.4% |
| 38g232wc | Distributed Digital Preservation: Technical, Sustainability, and Organizational Developments | 151 | 69 | 82 | 45.7% |
| 5r21h55d | e-Infrastructure and Digital Preservation: Challenges and Outlook | 150 | 37 | 113 | 24.7% |
| 70q7f8kc | Tools for Preservation and Use of Complex and Diverse Digital Resources | 148 | 52 | 96 | 35.1% |
| 1dt1v1pc | DataUp: Further Development and Community Building | 139 | 31 | 108 | 22.3% |
| 7sk6659n | Digital Archeology: Recovering Digital Objects from Audio Waveforms | 136 | 22 | 114 | 16.2% |
| 89c466mn | Cobweb: Collaborative Collection Development for Web Archives | 133 | 35 | 98 | 26.3% |
| 89d4x6dj | Preservation in a dynamic environment: A librarian’s perspe | 132 | 0 | 132 | 0.0% |
| 5b1044cd | “The Links in the Chain”: Connecting Undergraduates with Primary Source Materials at the University of California | 130 | 48 | 82 | 36.9% |
| 050385r2 | Cobweb: Collaborative Collection Development for Web Archives | 129 | 40 | 89 | 31.0% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.