California Digital Library
Parent: UC Office of the President
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for July through October, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6xr6q38m | Building a National Finding Aid Network: Final Report | 1,667 | 292 | 1,375 | 17.5% |
| 2mw6v93b | Dash: Improving Community Repositories for Better Data Sharing | 420 | 5 | 415 | 1.2% |
| 9p9863nc | The ARK Identifier Scheme | 389 | 61 | 328 | 15.7% |
| 1wm2b563 | Methods to Tame the Madness: A Practitioner’s Guide to User Assessment Techniques for Online Finding Aid and Website Design | 325 | 7 | 318 | 2.2% |
| 9jw4964t | Practices, Trends, and Recommendations in Technical Appendix Usage for Selected Data-Intensive Disciplines | 302 | 23 | 279 | 7.6% |
| 51r4q7kw | Supporting research data mangement at the University of California | 277 | 7 | 270 | 2.5% |
| 1dt1v1pc | DataUp: Further Development and Community Building | 267 | 5 | 262 | 1.9% |
| 3tv1m5xj | Summary of Research: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 262 | 44 | 218 | 16.8% |
| 5b1044cd | “The Links in the Chain”: Connecting Undergraduates with Primary Source Materials at the University of California | 258 | 5 | 253 | 1.9% |
| 7tf5q7n3 | Primer on Data Management: What you always wanted to know | 243 | 60 | 183 | 24.7% |
| 5qp9z6tb | Pop-up Survey: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 187 | 55 | 132 | 29.4% |
| 0bj150gj | Outcomes, Questions, and Answers: “The Right to Deposit (R2D) Uniform guidance to ensure author compliance and public access” | 181 | 16 | 165 | 8.8% |
| 94f35801 | Big data and the future of ecology | 160 | 94 | 66 | 58.8% |
| 7hn3m08f | User Interviews: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 149 | 42 | 107 | 28.2% |
| 90k6w2wf | EAD Analysis: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 128 | 30 | 98 | 23.4% |
| 73m910w8 | Ten persistent myths about persistent identifiers | 127 | 24 | 103 | 18.9% |
| 5sp13112 | Finding Aid Aggregation at a Crossroads | 126 | 32 | 94 | 25.4% |
| 81s9129f | Focus Group Interviews: Findings from the Building a National Archival Finding Aid Network Project | 126 | 38 | 88 | 30.2% |
| 7d3465vg | Digital Materiality: Preserving Access to Computers as Complete Environments | 125 | 58 | 67 | 46.4% |
| 0wf3j9cw | Significant Properties, Authenticity, Provenance, Representation Information and OAIS Information | 119 | 40 | 79 | 33.6% |
| 2zm9x47c | Persistence statements: describing digital stickiness | 105 | 32 | 73 | 30.5% |
| 0kd7d5m0 | Increasing discovery of archives: A project to provide better pathways to archival records in cultural heritage collections | 99 | 16 | 83 | 16.2% |
| 9wx8337z | “Make it so”: Sustainable, Academy-Owned Publishing Infrastructure with CDL, Michigan, & Janeway | 99 | 29 | 70 | 29.3% |
| 3g64n275 | Toward a National Archival Finding Aid Network - From Planning Initiative to Project and Program: An Action Plan | 85 | 26 | 59 | 30.6% |
| 38g232wc | Distributed Digital Preservation: Technical, Sustainability, and Organizational Developments | 79 | 52 | 27 | 65.8% |
| 8vh1k54f | UC HathiTrust ETAS Assessment - Summative Report to CoUL | 79 | 19 | 60 | 24.1% |
| 5v75k1k6 | DEI Efforts Across GLAM Organizations: A Report by the GLAM Diversity Subgroup of the DLF Committee for Equity and Inclusion. | 78 | 0 | 78 | 0.0% |
| 2gs3p6jx | Memento Mundi: Are Virtual Worlds History? | 77 | 16 | 61 | 20.8% |
| 4vr6n902 | UC Libraries Academic e-Book Usage Survey | 70 | 24 | 46 | 34.3% |
| 37t0658s | Integrating Multiple Platforms with OpenID Connect, A Shared Authentication Service | 69 | 9 | 60 | 13.0% |
| 08s7w2fd | Advancing Scholarship through Digital Critical Editions: Mark Twain Project Online | 63 | 8 | 55 | 12.7% |
| 5xm3v98h | Preserving the Digital Memory of the Government of Canada: Influence and Collaboration with Records Creators | 62 | 29 | 33 | 46.8% |
| 0t2075qc | Chronopolis: Preserving our Digital Heritage | 61 | 35 | 26 | 57.4% |
| 8dd2m5qw | Are You Ready? Assessing Whether Organisations are Prepared for Digital Preservation | 61 | 25 | 36 | 41.0% |
| 8089m1v1 | Towards a Methodology for Software Preservation | 60 | 19 | 41 | 31.7% |
| 6bt4v3zs | The Human Face of Digital Preservation: Organizational and Staff Challenges, and Initiatives at the Bibliothèque nationale de France | 58 | 19 | 39 | 32.8% |
| 89c466mn | Cobweb: Collaborative Collection Development for Web Archives | 58 | 18 | 40 | 31.0% |
| 8t2639xb | The GrabIt Package Exchange Protocol | 58 | 16 | 42 | 27.6% |
| 12p437bd | Implementing Metadata that Guides Digital Preservation Services | 55 | 24 | 31 | 43.6% |
| 050385r2 | Cobweb: Collaborative Collection Development for Web Archives | 54 | 18 | 36 | 33.3% |
| 0s38n5w4 | Integrating Metadata Standards to Support Long-Term Preservation of Digital Assets: Developing Best Practices for Expressing Preservation Metadata in a Container Format | 54 | 13 | 41 | 24.1% |
| 9kf081vf | Making Data Count: A Data Metrics Pilot Project | 51 | 21 | 30 | 41.2% |
| 89d4x6dj | Preservation in a dynamic environment: A librarian’s perspe | 46 | 0 | 46 | 0.0% |
| 5313h6k9 | An Emergent Micro-Services Approach to Digital Curation Infrastructure | 45 | 16 | 29 | 35.6% |
| 9tw130cc | Mainstreaming Preservation through Slicing and Dicing of Digital Repositories: Investigating Alternative Service and Resource Options for ContextMiner Using Data Grid Technology | 45 | 22 | 23 | 48.9% |
| 86p3x8hw | Supporting Research Data Management at the University of California | 44 | 19 | 25 | 43.2% |
| 11x8h6r1 | Collaborative Collection Development with Cobweb | 43 | 16 | 27 | 37.2% |
| 4d09c0bb | Cost Model for Digital Curation: Cost of Digital Migration | 42 | 4 | 38 | 9.5% |
| 038225mj | Securing the Future of Federal Research: Mirroring Data.gov as a Vital Scholarly Resource | 41 | 0 | 41 | 0.0% |
| 23b3225n | LIFE3: Predicting Long Term Digital Preservation Costs | 41 | 7 | 34 | 17.1% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.