Carbon Sequestration
Parent: California Institute for Energy and Environment (CIEE)
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for June through September, 2026
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3tp538q9 | Assessment of the Barriers and Value of Applying CO2 Sequestration in California | 540 | 456 | 84 | 84.4% |
| 57g7w24m | Opportunity assessment for establishing hybrid poplars in California, Oregon and Washington, and Summary of the carbon storage potential for fast growing species (hybrid poplar) in Oregon | 160 | 58 | 102 | 36.3% |
| 1tn8n7gq | Reforestation as a Forest Carbon Project: An Outreach Toolkit for Conservation Organizations and Landowners | 150 | 91 | 59 | 60.7% |
| 8c00350j | A Contribution to the West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB), Phase II | 136 | 79 | 57 | 58.1% |
| 0hz7301s | An analysis of wildfire fuel treatments as a carbon offset project type | 128 | 29 | 99 | 22.7% |
| 1056426n | Centralia (Washington) geologic formation CO2 storage assessment | 126 | 67 | 59 | 53.2% |
| 5qx7m29p | Assessment of the Potential for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration by Reactions with Mafic Rocks and by Enhanced Oil Recovery in Nevada | 117 | 85 | 32 | 72.6% |
| 585485h9 | Potential for induced seismicity related to the Northern California CO2 reduction projection pilot test, Solano County, California. | 112 | 80 | 32 | 71.4% |
| 4kp9x04j | Research Roadmap of Technologies for Carbon Sequestration Alternatives | 103 | 39 | 64 | 37.9% |
| 5755n5tq | WESTCARB afforestation pilot projects in Shasta County, California | 97 | 14 | 83 | 14.4% |
| 9xg9n2pj | Final Report on WESTCARB fuels management pilot activities in Lake County, Oregon | 96 | 16 | 80 | 16.7% |
| 13g526j2 | Baseline greenhouse gas emissions and removals for forest and rangelands in California | 94 | 30 | 64 | 31.9% |
| 1hp9f7tg | Alaska geologic CO2 storage: Scoping evaluation of deep coal seam and saline aquifer storage potential | 92 | 30 | 62 | 32.6% |
| 30z1r87m | Regional characterization for the Arizona: potential of riparian areas for carbon sequestration | 82 | 20 | 62 | 24.4% |
| 1268m1mp | Summary of the rangelands suitable for terrestrial carbon sequestration in Shasta County | 80 | 20 | 60 | 25.0% |
| 5gv9c890 | Carbon Utilization to Meet California’s Climate Change Goals | 80 | 32 | 48 | 40.0% |
| 63c8g8vk | Storage estimates – Washington and Oregon onshore and offshore sedimentary basins | 78 | 18 | 60 | 23.1% |
| 7mn6x3x4 | CO2 resource assessment – oil and gas fields of California | 74 | 7 | 67 | 9.5% |
| 2qt5x4js | Physical Modeling Of CO2 Sequestration | 73 | 16 | 57 | 21.9% |
| 39c3883f | Emissions and potential emission reductions from hazardous fuel treatments in the WESTCARB region (including 4 appendices) | 71 | 20 | 51 | 28.2% |
| 4t191183 | Supplemental View of the California CCS Review Panel Recommendations | 69 | 18 | 51 | 26.1% |
| 9258g443 | Findings and Recommendations by the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel | 69 | 19 | 50 | 27.5% |
| 1qq3m68d | Certification framework: leakage risk assessment for CO2 injection at the Montezuma Hills site, Solano County, California. | 66 | 24 | 42 | 36.4% |
| 17q6q5jp | Characterization of the greenhouse gas emissions associated with conversion of forest to residential Development the Puget Sound, Washington. | 65 | 22 | 43 | 33.8% |
| 35r8w5qf | West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB) Down-Select Report for Task 7: The King Island Characterization Well at King Island, San Joaquin County, California. | 63 | 28 | 35 | 44.4% |
| 3z3908w5 | Background Reports for the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel | 61 | 21 | 40 | 34.4% |
| 0cd4g4s8 | The role of social factors in shaping public perception of CCS: results of multi-state focus group interviews in the US | 59 | 16 | 43 | 27.1% |
| 3rq2g4sg | California's Policy Approach to Develop Carbon Capture, Utilization and Sequestration as a Mitigation Technology | 57 | 27 | 30 | 47.4% |
| 5ph7c1kh | Carbon Market Investment Criteria for Biochar projects | 57 | 15 | 42 | 26.3% |
| 5hc547gk | Baseline greenhouse gas emissions and removals for forest and rangelands in Arizona | 55 | 12 | 43 | 21.8% |
| 7890t6d3 | Final Report on WESTCARB fuels management pilot activities in Shasta County, California | 51 | 14 | 37 | 27.5% |
| 07z0c8c8 | Environmental non-governmental organizations’ perceptions of geologic sequestration | 50 | 16 | 34 | 32.0% |
| 3g35k5gf | Demonstration of conservation-based forest management to sequester carbon on the Bascom Pacific Forest | 49 | 21 | 28 | 42.9% |
| 1np0n59w | Project Idea Note: afforestation/restoration of riparian areas along Santa Cruz River, Arizona USA | 47 | 12 | 35 | 25.5% |
| 37r1w6x3 | Anticipatory Regulation: Lessons from fracking and insights for Greenhouse Gas Removal innovation and governance | 46 | 0 | 46 | 0.0% |
| 2t61h2qq | Demonstration of the Climate Action Reserve Forestry protocols at the LaTour Demonstration State Forest | 44 | 16 | 28 | 36.4% |
| 9s01r425 | Seismicity characterization and monitoring at WESTCARB’s proposed Montezuma Hills geologic sequestration site. | 42 | 24 | 18 | 57.1% |
| 4240468x | Community perceptions of carbon sequestration – insights from California | 36 | 12 | 24 | 33.3% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.