Carbon Sequestration
Parent: California Institute for Energy and Environment (CIEE)
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for April through July, 2024
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5ph7c1kh | Carbon Market Investment Criteria for Biochar projects | 69 | 4 | 65 | 5.8% |
| 3tp538q9 | Assessment of the Barriers and Value of Applying CO2 Sequestration in California | 45 | 11 | 34 | 24.4% |
| 35r8w5qf | West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB) Down-Select Report for Task 7: The King Island Characterization Well at King Island, San Joaquin County, California. | 43 | 12 | 31 | 27.9% |
| 1hp9f7tg | Alaska geologic CO2 storage: Scoping evaluation of deep coal seam and saline aquifer storage potential | 41 | 20 | 21 | 48.8% |
| 0hz7301s | An analysis of wildfire fuel treatments as a carbon offset project type | 31 | 6 | 25 | 19.4% |
| 4240468x | Community perceptions of carbon sequestration – insights from California | 30 | 14 | 16 | 46.7% |
| 4kp9x04j | Research Roadmap of Technologies for Carbon Sequestration Alternatives | 28 | 4 | 24 | 14.3% |
| 5gv9c890 | Carbon Utilization to Meet California’s Climate Change Goals | 28 | 13 | 15 | 46.4% |
| 2qt5x4js | Physical Modeling Of CO2 Sequestration | 27 | 11 | 16 | 40.7% |
| 8c00350j | A Contribution to the West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB), Phase II | 27 | 7 | 20 | 25.9% |
| 1tn8n7gq | Reforestation as a Forest Carbon Project: An Outreach Toolkit for Conservation Organizations and Landowners | 26 | 12 | 14 | 46.2% |
| 3rq2g4sg | California's Policy Approach to Develop Carbon Capture, Utilization and Sequestration as a Mitigation Technology | 26 | 10 | 16 | 38.5% |
| 5hc547gk | Baseline greenhouse gas emissions and removals for forest and rangelands in Arizona | 26 | 13 | 13 | 50.0% |
| 07z0c8c8 | Environmental non-governmental organizations’ perceptions of geologic sequestration | 25 | 3 | 22 | 12.0% |
| 0cd4g4s8 | The role of social factors in shaping public perception of CCS: results of multi-state focus group interviews in the US | 25 | 1 | 24 | 4.0% |
| 1268m1mp | Summary of the rangelands suitable for terrestrial carbon sequestration in Shasta County | 25 | 9 | 16 | 36.0% |
| 1qq3m68d | Certification framework: leakage risk assessment for CO2 injection at the Montezuma Hills site, Solano County, California. | 25 | 15 | 10 | 60.0% |
| 5755n5tq | WESTCARB afforestation pilot projects in Shasta County, California | 24 | 11 | 13 | 45.8% |
| 1056426n | Centralia (Washington) geologic formation CO2 storage assessment | 23 | 6 | 17 | 26.1% |
| 1np0n59w | Project Idea Note: afforestation/restoration of riparian areas along Santa Cruz River, Arizona USA | 22 | 11 | 11 | 50.0% |
| 9s01r425 | Seismicity characterization and monitoring at WESTCARB’s proposed Montezuma Hills geologic sequestration site. | 22 | 8 | 14 | 36.4% |
| 9xg9n2pj | Final Report on WESTCARB fuels management pilot activities in Lake County, Oregon | 22 | 2 | 20 | 9.1% |
| 17q6q5jp | Characterization of the greenhouse gas emissions associated with conversion of forest to residential Development the Puget Sound, Washington. | 21 | 12 | 9 | 57.1% |
| 585485h9 | Potential for induced seismicity related to the Northern California CO2 reduction projection pilot test, Solano County, California. | 21 | 7 | 14 | 33.3% |
| 39c3883f | Emissions and potential emission reductions from hazardous fuel treatments in the WESTCARB region (including 4 appendices) | 20 | 7 | 13 | 35.0% |
| 3z3908w5 | Background Reports for the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel | 20 | 7 | 13 | 35.0% |
| 13g526j2 | Baseline greenhouse gas emissions and removals for forest and rangelands in California | 19 | 8 | 11 | 42.1% |
| 37r1w6x3 | Anticipatory Regulation: Lessons from fracking and insights for Greenhouse Gas Removal innovation and governance | 19 | 0 | 19 | 0.0% |
| 3g35k5gf | Demonstration of conservation-based forest management to sequester carbon on the Bascom Pacific Forest | 19 | 6 | 13 | 31.6% |
| 4t191183 | Supplemental View of the California CCS Review Panel Recommendations | 18 | 5 | 13 | 27.8% |
| 30z1r87m | Regional characterization for the Arizona: potential of riparian areas for carbon sequestration | 17 | 6 | 11 | 35.3% |
| 7890t6d3 | Final Report on WESTCARB fuels management pilot activities in Shasta County, California | 17 | 4 | 13 | 23.5% |
| 57g7w24m | Opportunity assessment for establishing hybrid poplars in California, Oregon and Washington, and Summary of the carbon storage potential for fast growing species (hybrid poplar) in Oregon | 14 | 4 | 10 | 28.6% |
| 63c8g8vk | Storage estimates – Washington and Oregon onshore and offshore sedimentary basins | 14 | 6 | 8 | 42.9% |
| 9258g443 | Findings and Recommendations by the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel | 14 | 2 | 12 | 14.3% |
| 2t61h2qq | Demonstration of the Climate Action Reserve Forestry protocols at the LaTour Demonstration State Forest | 13 | 2 | 11 | 15.4% |
| 7mn6x3x4 | CO2 resource assessment – oil and gas fields of California | 13 | 6 | 7 | 46.2% |
| 5qx7m29p | Assessment of the Potential for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration by Reactions with Mafic Rocks and by Enhanced Oil Recovery in Nevada | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0.0% |
Disclaimer: due to the evolving nature of the web traffic we receive and the methods we use to collate it, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision.