Carbon Sequestration
Parent: California Institute for Energy and Environment (CIEE)
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for May through August, 2026
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3tp538q9 | Assessment of the Barriers and Value of Applying CO2 Sequestration in California | 638 | 543 | 95 | 85.1% |
| 1tn8n7gq | Reforestation as a Forest Carbon Project: An Outreach Toolkit for Conservation Organizations and Landowners | 195 | 127 | 68 | 65.1% |
| 8c00350j | A Contribution to the West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB), Phase II | 171 | 104 | 67 | 60.8% |
| 0hz7301s | An analysis of wildfire fuel treatments as a carbon offset project type | 169 | 41 | 128 | 24.3% |
| 57g7w24m | Opportunity assessment for establishing hybrid poplars in California, Oregon and Washington, and Summary of the carbon storage potential for fast growing species (hybrid poplar) in Oregon | 166 | 71 | 95 | 42.8% |
| 585485h9 | Potential for induced seismicity related to the Northern California CO2 reduction projection pilot test, Solano County, California. | 149 | 112 | 37 | 75.2% |
| 1056426n | Centralia (Washington) geologic formation CO2 storage assessment | 136 | 73 | 63 | 53.7% |
| 1hp9f7tg | Alaska geologic CO2 storage: Scoping evaluation of deep coal seam and saline aquifer storage potential | 126 | 46 | 80 | 36.5% |
| 5qx7m29p | Assessment of the Potential for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration by Reactions with Mafic Rocks and by Enhanced Oil Recovery in Nevada | 122 | 92 | 30 | 75.4% |
| 5755n5tq | WESTCARB afforestation pilot projects in Shasta County, California | 121 | 33 | 88 | 27.3% |
| 9xg9n2pj | Final Report on WESTCARB fuels management pilot activities in Lake County, Oregon | 120 | 38 | 82 | 31.7% |
| 4kp9x04j | Research Roadmap of Technologies for Carbon Sequestration Alternatives | 116 | 54 | 62 | 46.6% |
| 1268m1mp | Summary of the rangelands suitable for terrestrial carbon sequestration in Shasta County | 115 | 43 | 72 | 37.4% |
| 5gv9c890 | Carbon Utilization to Meet California’s Climate Change Goals | 113 | 45 | 68 | 39.8% |
| 13g526j2 | Baseline greenhouse gas emissions and removals for forest and rangelands in California | 112 | 52 | 60 | 46.4% |
| 2qt5x4js | Physical Modeling Of CO2 Sequestration | 110 | 45 | 65 | 40.9% |
| 17q6q5jp | Characterization of the greenhouse gas emissions associated with conversion of forest to residential Development the Puget Sound, Washington. | 102 | 36 | 66 | 35.3% |
| 9258g443 | Findings and Recommendations by the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel | 101 | 39 | 62 | 38.6% |
| 3z3908w5 | Background Reports for the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel | 97 | 35 | 62 | 36.1% |
| 0cd4g4s8 | The role of social factors in shaping public perception of CCS: results of multi-state focus group interviews in the US | 93 | 38 | 55 | 40.9% |
| 63c8g8vk | Storage estimates – Washington and Oregon onshore and offshore sedimentary basins | 93 | 32 | 61 | 34.4% |
| 30z1r87m | Regional characterization for the Arizona: potential of riparian areas for carbon sequestration | 92 | 42 | 50 | 45.7% |
| 35r8w5qf | West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB) Down-Select Report for Task 7: The King Island Characterization Well at King Island, San Joaquin County, California. | 92 | 47 | 45 | 51.1% |
| 3rq2g4sg | California's Policy Approach to Develop Carbon Capture, Utilization and Sequestration as a Mitigation Technology | 91 | 44 | 47 | 48.4% |
| 07z0c8c8 | Environmental non-governmental organizations’ perceptions of geologic sequestration | 86 | 33 | 53 | 38.4% |
| 5ph7c1kh | Carbon Market Investment Criteria for Biochar projects | 84 | 20 | 64 | 23.8% |
| 5hc547gk | Baseline greenhouse gas emissions and removals for forest and rangelands in Arizona | 81 | 26 | 55 | 32.1% |
| 4t191183 | Supplemental View of the California CCS Review Panel Recommendations | 80 | 35 | 45 | 43.8% |
| 7mn6x3x4 | CO2 resource assessment – oil and gas fields of California | 77 | 17 | 60 | 22.1% |
| 39c3883f | Emissions and potential emission reductions from hazardous fuel treatments in the WESTCARB region (including 4 appendices) | 73 | 36 | 37 | 49.3% |
| 9s01r425 | Seismicity characterization and monitoring at WESTCARB’s proposed Montezuma Hills geologic sequestration site. | 73 | 38 | 35 | 52.1% |
| 2t61h2qq | Demonstration of the Climate Action Reserve Forestry protocols at the LaTour Demonstration State Forest | 72 | 34 | 38 | 47.2% |
| 1qq3m68d | Certification framework: leakage risk assessment for CO2 injection at the Montezuma Hills site, Solano County, California. | 68 | 39 | 29 | 57.4% |
| 1np0n59w | Project Idea Note: afforestation/restoration of riparian areas along Santa Cruz River, Arizona USA | 67 | 28 | 39 | 41.8% |
| 4240468x | Community perceptions of carbon sequestration – insights from California | 67 | 27 | 40 | 40.3% |
| 37r1w6x3 | Anticipatory Regulation: Lessons from fracking and insights for Greenhouse Gas Removal innovation and governance | 63 | 0 | 63 | 0.0% |
| 7890t6d3 | Final Report on WESTCARB fuels management pilot activities in Shasta County, California | 59 | 24 | 35 | 40.7% |
| 3g35k5gf | Demonstration of conservation-based forest management to sequester carbon on the Bascom Pacific Forest | 56 | 23 | 33 | 41.1% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.