Carbon Sequestration
Parent: California Institute for Energy and Environment (CIEE)
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for March through June, 2025
| Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 57g7w24m | Opportunity assessment for establishing hybrid poplars in California, Oregon and Washington, and Summary of the carbon storage potential for fast growing species (hybrid poplar) in Oregon | 69 | 6 | 63 | 8.7% |
| 3tp538q9 | Assessment of the Barriers and Value of Applying CO2 Sequestration in California | 67 | 20 | 47 | 29.9% |
| 5gv9c890 | Carbon Utilization to Meet California’s Climate Change Goals | 59 | 8 | 51 | 13.6% |
| 1np0n59w | Project Idea Note: afforestation/restoration of riparian areas along Santa Cruz River, Arizona USA | 53 | 3 | 50 | 5.7% |
| 2qt5x4js | Physical Modeling Of CO2 Sequestration | 51 | 1 | 50 | 2.0% |
| 9xg9n2pj | Final Report on WESTCARB fuels management pilot activities in Lake County, Oregon | 50 | 5 | 45 | 10.0% |
| 0cd4g4s8 | The role of social factors in shaping public perception of CCS: results of multi-state focus group interviews in the US | 49 | 3 | 46 | 6.1% |
| 0hz7301s | An analysis of wildfire fuel treatments as a carbon offset project type | 48 | 4 | 44 | 8.3% |
| 5ph7c1kh | Carbon Market Investment Criteria for Biochar projects | 48 | 9 | 39 | 18.8% |
| 39c3883f | Emissions and potential emission reductions from hazardous fuel treatments in the WESTCARB region (including 4 appendices) | 47 | 5 | 42 | 10.6% |
| 13g526j2 | Baseline greenhouse gas emissions and removals for forest and rangelands in California | 46 | 5 | 41 | 10.9% |
| 585485h9 | Potential for induced seismicity related to the Northern California CO2 reduction projection pilot test, Solano County, California. | 46 | 7 | 39 | 15.2% |
| 8c00350j | A Contribution to the West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB), Phase II | 46 | 5 | 41 | 10.9% |
| 17q6q5jp | Characterization of the greenhouse gas emissions associated with conversion of forest to residential Development the Puget Sound, Washington. | 45 | 2 | 43 | 4.4% |
| 5755n5tq | WESTCARB afforestation pilot projects in Shasta County, California | 45 | 6 | 39 | 13.3% |
| 07z0c8c8 | Environmental non-governmental organizations’ perceptions of geologic sequestration | 44 | 2 | 42 | 4.5% |
| 1056426n | Centralia (Washington) geologic formation CO2 storage assessment | 44 | 8 | 36 | 18.2% |
| 4240468x | Community perceptions of carbon sequestration – insights from California | 43 | 3 | 40 | 7.0% |
| 1tn8n7gq | Reforestation as a Forest Carbon Project: An Outreach Toolkit for Conservation Organizations and Landowners | 42 | 3 | 39 | 7.1% |
| 3z3908w5 | Background Reports for the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel | 42 | 8 | 34 | 19.0% |
| 1268m1mp | Summary of the rangelands suitable for terrestrial carbon sequestration in Shasta County | 41 | 2 | 39 | 4.9% |
| 3rq2g4sg | California's Policy Approach to Develop Carbon Capture, Utilization and Sequestration as a Mitigation Technology | 41 | 3 | 38 | 7.3% |
| 4kp9x04j | Research Roadmap of Technologies for Carbon Sequestration Alternatives | 41 | 12 | 29 | 29.3% |
| 1hp9f7tg | Alaska geologic CO2 storage: Scoping evaluation of deep coal seam and saline aquifer storage potential | 40 | 6 | 34 | 15.0% |
| 9258g443 | Findings and Recommendations by the California Carbon Capture and Storage Review Panel | 39 | 6 | 33 | 15.4% |
| 1qq3m68d | Certification framework: leakage risk assessment for CO2 injection at the Montezuma Hills site, Solano County, California. | 38 | 10 | 28 | 26.3% |
| 2t61h2qq | Demonstration of the Climate Action Reserve Forestry protocols at the LaTour Demonstration State Forest | 38 | 3 | 35 | 7.9% |
| 30z1r87m | Regional characterization for the Arizona: potential of riparian areas for carbon sequestration | 38 | 6 | 32 | 15.8% |
| 9s01r425 | Seismicity characterization and monitoring at WESTCARB’s proposed Montezuma Hills geologic sequestration site. | 38 | 3 | 35 | 7.9% |
| 7890t6d3 | Final Report on WESTCARB fuels management pilot activities in Shasta County, California | 37 | 4 | 33 | 10.8% |
| 4t191183 | Supplemental View of the California CCS Review Panel Recommendations | 36 | 3 | 33 | 8.3% |
| 5hc547gk | Baseline greenhouse gas emissions and removals for forest and rangelands in Arizona | 36 | 3 | 33 | 8.3% |
| 35r8w5qf | West Coast Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (WESTCARB) Down-Select Report for Task 7: The King Island Characterization Well at King Island, San Joaquin County, California. | 35 | 6 | 29 | 17.1% |
| 37r1w6x3 | Anticipatory Regulation: Lessons from fracking and insights for Greenhouse Gas Removal innovation and governance | 35 | 0 | 35 | 0.0% |
| 3g35k5gf | Demonstration of conservation-based forest management to sequester carbon on the Bascom Pacific Forest | 33 | 13 | 20 | 39.4% |
| 7mn6x3x4 | CO2 resource assessment – oil and gas fields of California | 32 | 2 | 30 | 6.3% |
| 63c8g8vk | Storage estimates – Washington and Oregon onshore and offshore sedimentary basins | 29 | 5 | 24 | 17.2% |
| 5qx7m29p | Assessment of the Potential for Carbon Dioxide Sequestration by Reactions with Mafic Rocks and by Enhanced Oil Recovery in Nevada | 17 | 5 | 12 | 29.4% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.