University of California Pavement Research Center

Parent: UC Davis Institute of Transportation Studies

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for September through December, 2024

ItemTitleTotal requestsDownloadView-only%Dnld
4z94w3xrEffects of Increased Weights of Alternative Fuel Trucks on Pavement and Bridges39713726034.5%
14r6b3x8Identification of Likely Alternative Supplementary Cementitious Materials in California: A Review of Supplies, Technical Performance in Concrete, Economic, and Climatic Considerations27310117237.0%
7rv0p26cNoise Barrier Design: Danish and Some European Examples1503111920.7%
9f5181j1eLCAP: A Web Application for Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Pavements1471513210.2%
2np2f69jUse of Recycled Asphalt Pavement in Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt—Gap Graded114427236.8%
2p76t1g4Heavier Alternative Fuel Trucks Are Not Expected to Cause Significant Additional Pavement Damage110614955.5%
54z679x4Guide for Partial- and Full-Depth Pavement Recycling in California101307129.7%
8v36909gPavement Life Cycle Inventories for California: Models and Data Development in the Last Decade for Caltrans101564555.4%
0347c9zjGuidelines for the Selection, Specification, and Application of Chemical Dust Control and Stabilization Treatments on Unpaved Roads98326632.7%
31n5j963Pavement Recycling: Shrinkage Crack Mitigation in Cement-Treated Pavement Layers — Phase 2a Literature Review and FDR-C Test Road Construction and Monitoring90414945.6%
86f4f3srConcrete Overlay on Asphalt Pilot Project at Woodland SR 113: Construction834794.8%
6sr85541Site Investigation Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Design of California Pavements82166619.5%
80c7d0rcFatigue Performance of Asphalt Concrete Mixes and Its Relationship to Asphalt Concrete Pavement Performance in California81176421.0%
169477d9Updating Weigh-in-Motion (WIM) Spectra in PaveM77146318.2%
1nm5c9gpPavement Environmental Life Cycle Assessment Tool for Local Governments765716.6%
0mx245rdLife Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Cost Analysis for Six Strategies for GHG Reduction in Caltrans Operations74235131.1%
1870m3g9Optimizing Rubberized Open-graded Friction Course (RHMA-O) Mix Designs for Water Quality Benefits: Phase I: Literature Review74165821.6%
52d1d1q5Preliminary Study on Developing a Surrogate Performance-Related Test for Fatigue Cracking of Asphalt Pavements68204829.4%
03p4h24fPavement ME JPCP Transverse Cracking Model Calibration and Design Catalog Framework (Version 2.5.5)64313348.4%
54w74550Development of Caltrans Jointed Plain Concrete Pavement Design Catalog Tables Using Pavement ME6495514.1%
8h67s9z0RAP and RAS in HMA Pilot Project on ELD 49: Material Testing, Observations, and Findings63125119.0%
5sn5f1xnEarly-Age and Premature Cracking in Jointed Plain Concrete Pavements: Literature Review614576.6%
6kf121z3Drying Shrinkage Response of Full-Scale Thin Concrete Overlay on Asphalt Sections61154624.6%
0b9635gmeLCAP: A Web Application for Environmental Life Cycle Assessment for Pavements60174328.3%
460234g0Updates to CalME and Calibration of Cracking Models58263244.8%
6qh191c1Permeability Testing on Dense-Graded Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) and Gap-Graded Rubberized Hot Mix Asphalt (RHMA-G) Surfaces5875112.1%
3jc3d3xsPavement Life Cycle Assessment Workshop: Discussion Summary and Guidelines57154226.3%
6bv7d7t6Pavement ME Sensitivity Analysis (Version 2.5.3)55183732.7%
1qh0c638Lessons Learned from Caltrans Pilot Program for Implementation of EPDs54262848.1%
9gn079w4Analysis of Recycling Agent Effects on the Mechanical Properties of HMA with High Recycled Binder Ratios5474713.0%
3p8312vsSimulation of Cumulative Annual Impact of Pavement Structural Response on Vehicle Fuel Economy for California Test Sections523495.8%
8k31f512UCPRC Life Cycle Assessment Methodology and Initial Case Studies for Energy Consumption and GHG Emissions for Pavement Preservation Treatments with Different Rolling Resistance51104119.6%
9cw18024Performance Based Specifications: Literature Review on Increasing Crumb Rubber Usage by Adding Small Amounts of Crumb Rubber Modifier in Hot Mix Asphalt51153629.4%
8zc70841Investigation of the Effect of Pavement Deflection on Vehicle Fuel Consumption: Field Testing and Empirical Analysis50183236.0%
02m0x1t7Framework and Demonstration of Simulations of Environmental Impacts from Traffic on Highway Construction Work Zones48153331.3%
7208x78qWhite Paper on Alternate Strategies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A Life Cycle Approach Using a Supply Curve48113722.9%
3jn462tcFriction Testing of Pavement Preservation Treatments: Literature Review46123426.1%
6qb3d9dxPavement Recycling: Literature Review on Shrinkage Crack Mitigation in Cement-Stabilized Pavement Layers46163034.8%
8242m1wqInvestigation of Design and Construction Issues for Long Life Concrete Pavement Strategies4693719.6%
0x08g456CAL/APT Program--Comparison of Caltrans and AASHTO Pavement Design Methods434399.3%
1720m3qtPavement Recycling: Shrinkage Crack Mitigation in Cement-Treated Pavement Layers—Phase 2b Laboratory Testing and Performance Modeling4393420.9%
4sh361xxInvestigation of Noise, Durability, Permeability, and Friction Performance Trends for Asphaltic Pavement Surface Types: First- and Second-Year Results4383518.6%
40j1p8k7Laboratory Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties of Asphalt Concrete Reinforced with Aramid Synthetic Fibers42182442.9%
6q9387qqLife Cycle Cost Analysis Input Framework for Full Depth Recycling and Application on State Route 113 and State Route 8440112927.5%
88c7551gTest Method Selection and Validation to Replace the R-Value Test40112927.5%
4vj060rvThin Concrete Overlay on Asphalt Pilot Project at Woodland SR 113: Initial Performance39132633.3%
70v6b651Guidelines for the Stabilization of Subgrade Soils in California3963315.4%
4jp5g461Twenty-Year Performance Review of Long-Life Jointed Plain Concrete Pavements38112728.9%
4mq5p6sdDevelopment of Performance-Based Specifications for Asphalt Rubber Binder: Interim Report on Phase 1 and Phase 2 Testing38112728.9%
7wq3s753First-Level Analysis of Phase 1 Heavy Vehicle Simulator and Laboratory Testing on Four RHMA-G Mixes to Investigate Nominal Maximum Aggregate Size, Layer Thickness, and Performance with Aggregate Replacement from Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement3682822.2%

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.