Journal of Writing Assessment
Parent: UC Davis
eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for March through June, 2025
Item | Title | Total requests | Download | View-only | %Dnld |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
3s97p28z | The Trouble With “Ungrading”: Toward Disciplinary Specificity in Alternative Writing Assessment | 545 | 139 | 406 | 25.5% |
1b90q8rd | Comments on Student Papers: Student Perspectives | 416 | 89 | 327 | 21.4% |
3m47g95t | Using Completion Rubrics to Grade Engagement in Online Spaces | 396 | 55 | 341 | 13.9% |
0934x4rm | Neurodivergence and Intersectionality in Labor-Based Grading Contracts | 350 | 72 | 278 | 20.6% |
62k3q7kp | Wrap-around support via a directed self placement model: A treatment for SLAC writing programs | 339 | 74 | 265 | 21.8% |
1nm1x2zp | Collaboratively Building Our SSP Scholarship (Because Placement is Still Everyone's Business) | 291 | 38 | 253 | 13.1% |
7696n7gf | Everything Old Is New Again: Reconsidering DSP Amid the Changing Academic Landscape at Grand Valley State University | 273 | 65 | 208 | 23.8% |
0j28w67h | A Legacy of Grading Contracts for Composition | 260 | 67 | 193 | 25.8% |
5vq519dr | Globalizing Plagiarism & Writing Assessment: A Case Study of Turnitin | 241 | 107 | 134 | 44.4% |
2k14r1zg | Ethical Considerations and Writing Assessment | 237 | 65 | 172 | 27.4% |
4s96g8sw | Afterword: Finding the Right Note in Writing Placement | 233 | 59 | 174 | 25.3% |
03g148gh | Reliability of National Writing Project's Analytic Writing Continuum Assessment System | 232 | 59 | 173 | 25.4% |
70g147sg | Achieving High Goals: The Impact of Contract Grading on High School Students' Academic Performance, Avoidance Orientation, and Social Comparison | 219 | 48 | 171 | 21.9% |
9m68h5g3 | Editor’s Introduction: Placement and Its Discontents or The Long Winding Road toward Change | 207 | 29 | 178 | 14.0% |
263565cq | The BABEL Generator and E-Rater: 21st Century Writing Constructs and Automated Essay Scoring (AES) | 206 | 34 | 172 | 16.5% |
1p60j218 | Enabling Meaningful Labor: Narratives of Participation in a Grading Contract | 189 | 21 | 168 | 11.1% |
36t565mm | A Theory of Ethics for Writing Assessment | 182 | 33 | 149 | 18.1% |
7qh108bw | Critique of Mark D. Shermis & Ben Hamner, 'Contrasting State-of-the-Art Automated Scoring of Essays: Analysis' | 179 | 17 | 162 | 9.5% |
52k3376g | Assessment is Constructed and Contextual: Identity, Information Literacy, and Interview-Based Methodologies in the First-Year Writing Classroom | 176 | 35 | 141 | 19.9% |
5dp4m86t | The Empirical Development of an Instrument to Measure Writerly Self-Efficacy in Writing Centers | 176 | 53 | 123 | 30.1% |
0xh7v6fb | Decolonizing Validity | 164 | 37 | 127 | 22.6% |
9fw125t3 | Informing Self-Placement: A Polyvocal Narrative Case Study | 164 | 38 | 126 | 23.2% |
5f79g6kz | College Students' Use of a Writing Rubric: Effect on Quality of Writing, Self-Efficacy, and Writing Practices | 155 | 24 | 131 | 15.5% |
1t5810bz | The Power of Tests: A Critical Perspective on the Uses of Language Texts by Elana Shohamy | 154 | 75 | 79 | 48.7% |
2c4979b8 | Contract Grading and the Development of an Efficacious Writerly Habitus | 151 | 29 | 122 | 19.2% |
06n1v820 | Linguistic microfeatures to predict L2 writing proficiency: A case study in Automated Writing Evaluation | 148 | 41 | 107 | 27.7% |
2jw1298d | Supporting Student Linguistic Identity and Autonomy in Directed Self Placement Through Linguistic Domains Using Qualtrics Scoring | 146 | 33 | 113 | 22.6% |
3gm126sq | Construct Validity and the Demise of the Analytical Writing Placement Examination (AWPE) at the University of California: A Tale of Social Mobility | 144 | 33 | 111 | 22.9% |
9175z7zs | Write Outside the Boxes: The Single Point Rubric in the Secondary ELA Classroom | 143 | 17 | 126 | 11.9% |
07c5j8tp | Self-Characterization in the Self-Placement Assessment Ecology: Complicating the Stories We Tell about DSP’s Effects and Effectiveness | 141 | 19 | 122 | 13.5% |
3dc6w4hg | What Do We Reward in Reflection? Assessing Reflective Writing with the Index for Metacognitive Knowledge | 140 | 32 | 108 | 22.9% |
3zw9h7p9 | Stories About Grading Contracts, or How Do I Like Through the Violence I've Done? | 140 | 24 | 116 | 17.1% |
4bg9003k | An Integrated Design and Appraisal Framework for Ethical Writing Assessment | 140 | 6 | 134 | 4.3% |
4b85378n | Collaborative Writing Placement: Partnering with Students in the Placement Process | 139 | 34 | 105 | 24.5% |
2bt3m3nf | This is Not Only a Test: Exploring Structured Ethical Blindness in the Testing Industry | 133 | 19 | 114 | 14.3% |
3pc0n4dz | After Implementation: Assessing Student Self-Placement in College Writing Programs | 133 | 13 | 120 | 9.8% |
6w87j2wp | Reframing Reliability for Writing Assessment | 130 | 16 | 114 | 12.3% |
6vn170k5 | The Strange Loop of Self-Efficacy and the Value of Focus Groups in Writing Program Assessment | 129 | 28 | 101 | 21.7% |
1bn464xs | Testing the Tests, a review of George Hillocks: The Testing Trap: How State Writing Assessments Control Learning | 125 | 7 | 118 | 5.6% |
7m18h956 | Validity inquiry of race and shared evaluation practices in a large-scale, university-wide writing portfolio assessment | 124 | 11 | 113 | 8.9% |
08f1c307 | Civil Rights and Writing Assessment: Using the Disparate Impact Approach as a Fairness Methodology to Evaluate Social Impact | 122 | 14 | 108 | 11.5% |
7v9830xh | Placement is Everyone’s Business: A Love Letter to Our SSP Coalition | 121 | 20 | 101 | 16.5% |
31c793kf | Reflection. An Admitted Student is a Qualified Student: A Roadmap for Writing Placement in the Two-Year College | 118 | 29 | 89 | 24.6% |
3qr482bb | Multifaceted Equity: Critiquing a First-Year Writing Assessment through Curricular, Performance, and Reliability Lenses | 118 | 34 | 84 | 28.8% |
9jj077d4 | Recommendations or choices? A review of Decisions, Agency, and Advising | 118 | 6 | 112 | 5.1% |
3wz6s1qb | Directed Self-Placement for Multilingual, Multicultural International Students | 116 | 34 | 82 | 29.3% |
3nf6r4kv | Automated Essay Scoring in Innovative Assessments of Writing from Sources | 115 | 14 | 101 | 12.2% |
9hn4297f | Editor’s Introduction: The “Accidental California Issue” – Critical Questions about Fairness and Equity in Writing Assessment and Placement | 113 | 19 | 94 | 16.8% |
9sm4851w | Localizing Directed Self-Placement: UX Stories and Methods | 113 | 18 | 95 | 15.9% |
1f21q8ck | To Aggregate or Not? Linguistic Features in Automatic Essay Scoring and Feedback Systems | 112 | 16 | 96 | 14.3% |
Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.