Journal of Writing Assessment

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for November, 2024 through February, 2025

Item	Title	Total requests	Download	View-only	%Dnld
1b90q8rd	Comments on Student Papers: Student Perspectives	359	85	274	23.7%
0934x4rm	Neurodivergence and Intersectionality in Labor-Based Grading Contracts	356	79	277	22.2%
0j28w67h	A Legacy of Grading Contracts for Composition	318	80	238	25.2%
3gm126sq	Construct Validity and the Demise of the Analytical Writing Placement Examination (AWPE) at the University of California: A Tale of Social Mobility	295	67	228	22.7%
52k3376g	Assessment is Constructed and Contextual: Identity, Information Literacy, and Interview-Based Methodologies in the First-Year Writing Classroom	236	65	171	27.5%
6vn170k5	The Strange Loop of Self-Efficacy and the Value of Focus Groups in Writing Program Assessment	230	54	176	23.5%
9hn4297f	Editor’s Introduction: The “Accidental California Issue” – Critical Questions about Fairness and Equity in Writing Assessment and Placement	220	33	187	15.0%
4b85378n	Collaborative Writing Placement: Partnering with Students in the Placement Process	209	67	142	32.1%
7qh108bw	Critique of Mark D. Shermis & Ben Hamner, 'Contrasting State-of-the-Art Automated Scoring of Essays: Analysis'	203	26	177	12.8%
1p60j218	Enabling Meaningful Labor: Narratives of Participation in a Grading Contract	202	22	180	10.9%
263565cq	The BABEL Generator and E-Rater: 21st Century Writing Constructs and Automated Essay Scoring (AES)	197	41	156	20.8%
36t565mm	A Theory of Ethics for Writing Assessment	197	34	163	17.3%
3qr482bb	Multifaceted Equity: Critiquing a First-Year Writing Assessment through Curricular, Performance, and Reliability Lenses	172	41	131	23.8%
2c4979b8	Contract Grading and the Development of an Efficacious Writerly Habitus	169	50	119	29.6%
9175z7zs	Write Outside the Boxes: The Single Point Rubric in the Secondary ELA Classroom	168	18	150	10.7%
5dp4m86t	The Empirical Development of an Instrument to Measure Writerly Self-Efficacy in Writing Centers	160	51	109	31.9%
03g148gh	Reliability of National Writing Project's Analytic Writing Continuum Assessment System	159	34	125	21.4%
5vq519dr	Globalizing Plagiarism & Writing Assessment: A Case Study of Turnitin	157	25	132	15.9%
4bg9003k	An Integrated Design and Appraisal Framework for Ethical Writing Assessment	154	10	144	6.5%
70g147sg	Achieving High Goals: The Impact of Contract Grading on High School Students' Academic Performance, Avoidance Orientation, and Social Comparison	152	39	113	25.7%
5f79g6kz	College Students' Use of a Writing Rubric: Effect on Quality of Writing, Self-Efficacy, and Writing Practices	151	23	128	15.2%
7mp54031	Editor’s Introduction: Special Issue on Student Self Placement (SSP)	149	38	111	25.5%
7v9830xh	Placement is Everyone’s Business: A Love Letter to Our SSP Coalition	140	27	113	19.3%
3wz6s1qb	Directed Self-Placement for Multilingual, Multicultural International Students	138	38	100	27.5%
06n1v820	Linguistic microfeatures to predict L2 writing proficiency: A case study in Automated Writing Evaluation	137	32	105	23.4%
0xh7v6fb	Decolonizing Validity	137	22	115	16.1%
4v65z263	Building Student Agency Through Contract Grading in Technical Communication	132	13	119	9.8%
1bn464xs	Testing the Tests, a review of George Hillocks: The Testing Trap: How State Writing Assessments Control Learning	128	7	121	5.5%
6w87j2wp	Reframing Reliability for Writing Assessment	127	9	118	7.1%
93b9g3t6	Big Rubrics and Weird Genres: The Futility of Using Generic Assessment Tools Across Diverse Instructional Contexts	127	19	108	15.0%
3pc0n4dz	After Implementation: Assessing Student Self-Placement in College Writing Programs	123	38	85	30.9%
7gz1c60w	Dynamic Patterns: Emotional Episodes within Teachers' Response Practices	121	9	112	7.4%
07c5j8tp	Self-Characterization in the Self-Placement Assessment Ecology: Complicating the Stories We Tell about DSP’s Effects and Effectiveness	120	24	96	20.0%
3dc6w4hg	What Do We Reward in Reflection? Assessing Reflective Writing with the Index for Metacognitive Knowledge	116	27	89	23.3%
02q4g1gt	Contract Grading in a Technical Writing Classroom: A Case Study	114	14	100	12.3%
3c26v2hh	The Effects of Student-Fashioning and Teacher-Pleasing in the Assessment of First-Year Writing Reflective Essays	114	25	89	21.9%
2k14r1zg	Ethical Considerations and Writing Assessment	112	48	64	42.9%
2bt3m3nf	This is Not Only a Test: Exploring Structured Ethical Blindness in the Testing Industry	110	9	101	8.2%
4xb1c9gj	The Effect of Scoring Order on the Independence of Holistic and Analytic Scores	110	21	89	19.1%
8rb1j91b	Access, Digital Writing, and Achievement: The Data in Two Diverse School Districts	108	23	85	21.3%
7m18h956	Validity inquiry of race and shared evaluation practices in a large-scale, university-wide writing portfolio assessment	107	12	95	11.2%
2w69x0w5	Shifting the Locus of Control: Why the Common Core State Standards and Emerging Standardized Tests May Reshape College Writing Classrooms	105	3	102	2.9%
3zw9h7p9	Stories About Grading Contracts, or How Do I Like Through the Violence I've Done?	104	26	78	25.0%
6qc0j26v	Perceptions of Fairness in Summer Bridge Classrooms with Contract Grades	104	12	92	11.5%
9fw125t3	Informing Self-Placement: A Polyvocal Narrative Case Study	103	30	73	29.1%
1f21q8ck	To Aggregate or Not? Linguistic Features in Automatic Essay Scoring and Feedback Systems	102	13	89	12.7%
20w3m5d9	Assessing Academic Discourse: Levels of Competence in Handling Knowledge From Sources	100	5	95	5.0%
2jw1298d	Supporting Student Linguistic Identity and Autonomy in Directed Self Placement Through Linguistic Domains Using Qualtrics Scoring	98	27	71	27.6%
2c45c0gf	Engaging in Resistant Genres as Antiracist Teacher Response	93	9	84	9.7%
9hw9p7hc	Book Review: Labor-Based Grading Contracts: Building Equity and Inclusion in the Writing Classroom by Asao B. Inoue	93	11	82	11.8%

Top

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.