Journal of Writing Assessment

eScholarship stats: Breakdown by Item for March through June, 2025

Item	Title	Total requests	Download	View-only	%Dnld
3s97p28z	The Trouble With “Ungrading”: Toward Disciplinary Specificity in Alternative Writing Assessment	545	139	406	25.5%
1b90q8rd	Comments on Student Papers: Student Perspectives	416	89	327	21.4%
3m47g95t	Using Completion Rubrics to Grade Engagement in Online Spaces	396	55	341	13.9%
0934x4rm	Neurodivergence and Intersectionality in Labor-Based Grading Contracts	350	72	278	20.6%
62k3q7kp	Wrap-around support via a directed self placement model: A treatment for SLAC writing programs	339	74	265	21.8%
1nm1x2zp	Collaboratively Building Our SSP Scholarship (Because Placement is Still Everyone's Business)	291	38	253	13.1%
7696n7gf	Everything Old Is New Again: Reconsidering DSP Amid the Changing Academic Landscape at Grand Valley State University	273	65	208	23.8%
0j28w67h	A Legacy of Grading Contracts for Composition	260	67	193	25.8%
5vq519dr	Globalizing Plagiarism & Writing Assessment: A Case Study of Turnitin	241	107	134	44.4%
2k14r1zg	Ethical Considerations and Writing Assessment	237	65	172	27.4%
4s96g8sw	Afterword: Finding the Right Note in Writing Placement	233	59	174	25.3%
03g148gh	Reliability of National Writing Project's Analytic Writing Continuum Assessment System	232	59	173	25.4%
70g147sg	Achieving High Goals: The Impact of Contract Grading on High School Students' Academic Performance, Avoidance Orientation, and Social Comparison	219	48	171	21.9%
9m68h5g3	Editor’s Introduction: Placement and Its Discontents or The Long Winding Road toward Change	207	29	178	14.0%
263565cq	The BABEL Generator and E-Rater: 21st Century Writing Constructs and Automated Essay Scoring (AES)	206	34	172	16.5%
1p60j218	Enabling Meaningful Labor: Narratives of Participation in a Grading Contract	189	21	168	11.1%
36t565mm	A Theory of Ethics for Writing Assessment	182	33	149	18.1%
7qh108bw	Critique of Mark D. Shermis & Ben Hamner, 'Contrasting State-of-the-Art Automated Scoring of Essays: Analysis'	179	17	162	9.5%
52k3376g	Assessment is Constructed and Contextual: Identity, Information Literacy, and Interview-Based Methodologies in the First-Year Writing Classroom	176	35	141	19.9%
5dp4m86t	The Empirical Development of an Instrument to Measure Writerly Self-Efficacy in Writing Centers	176	53	123	30.1%
0xh7v6fb	Decolonizing Validity	164	37	127	22.6%
9fw125t3	Informing Self-Placement: A Polyvocal Narrative Case Study	164	38	126	23.2%
5f79g6kz	College Students' Use of a Writing Rubric: Effect on Quality of Writing, Self-Efficacy, and Writing Practices	155	24	131	15.5%
1t5810bz	The Power of Tests: A Critical Perspective on the Uses of Language Texts by Elana Shohamy	154	75	79	48.7%
2c4979b8	Contract Grading and the Development of an Efficacious Writerly Habitus	151	29	122	19.2%
06n1v820	Linguistic microfeatures to predict L2 writing proficiency: A case study in Automated Writing Evaluation	148	41	107	27.7%
2jw1298d	Supporting Student Linguistic Identity and Autonomy in Directed Self Placement Through Linguistic Domains Using Qualtrics Scoring	146	33	113	22.6%
3gm126sq	Construct Validity and the Demise of the Analytical Writing Placement Examination (AWPE) at the University of California: A Tale of Social Mobility	144	33	111	22.9%
9175z7zs	Write Outside the Boxes: The Single Point Rubric in the Secondary ELA Classroom	143	17	126	11.9%
07c5j8tp	Self-Characterization in the Self-Placement Assessment Ecology: Complicating the Stories We Tell about DSP’s Effects and Effectiveness	141	19	122	13.5%
3dc6w4hg	What Do We Reward in Reflection? Assessing Reflective Writing with the Index for Metacognitive Knowledge	140	32	108	22.9%
3zw9h7p9	Stories About Grading Contracts, or How Do I Like Through the Violence I've Done?	140	24	116	17.1%
4bg9003k	An Integrated Design and Appraisal Framework for Ethical Writing Assessment	140	6	134	4.3%
4b85378n	Collaborative Writing Placement: Partnering with Students in the Placement Process	139	34	105	24.5%
2bt3m3nf	This is Not Only a Test: Exploring Structured Ethical Blindness in the Testing Industry	133	19	114	14.3%
3pc0n4dz	After Implementation: Assessing Student Self-Placement in College Writing Programs	133	13	120	9.8%
6w87j2wp	Reframing Reliability for Writing Assessment	130	16	114	12.3%
6vn170k5	The Strange Loop of Self-Efficacy and the Value of Focus Groups in Writing Program Assessment	129	28	101	21.7%
1bn464xs	Testing the Tests, a review of George Hillocks: The Testing Trap: How State Writing Assessments Control Learning	125	7	118	5.6%
7m18h956	Validity inquiry of race and shared evaluation practices in a large-scale, university-wide writing portfolio assessment	124	11	113	8.9%
08f1c307	Civil Rights and Writing Assessment: Using the Disparate Impact Approach as a Fairness Methodology to Evaluate Social Impact	122	14	108	11.5%
7v9830xh	Placement is Everyone’s Business: A Love Letter to Our SSP Coalition	121	20	101	16.5%
31c793kf	Reflection. An Admitted Student is a Qualified Student: A Roadmap for Writing Placement in the Two-Year College	118	29	89	24.6%
3qr482bb	Multifaceted Equity: Critiquing a First-Year Writing Assessment through Curricular, Performance, and Reliability Lenses	118	34	84	28.8%
9jj077d4	Recommendations or choices? A review of Decisions, Agency, and Advising	118	6	112	5.1%
3wz6s1qb	Directed Self-Placement for Multilingual, Multicultural International Students	116	34	82	29.3%
3nf6r4kv	Automated Essay Scoring in Innovative Assessments of Writing from Sources	115	14	101	12.2%
9hn4297f	Editor’s Introduction: The “Accidental California Issue” – Critical Questions about Fairness and Equity in Writing Assessment and Placement	113	19	94	16.8%
9sm4851w	Localizing Directed Self-Placement: UX Stories and Methods	113	18	95	15.9%
1f21q8ck	To Aggregate or Not? Linguistic Features in Automatic Essay Scoring and Feedback Systems	112	16	96	14.3%

Top

Note: Due to the evolving nature of web traffic, the data presented here should be considered approximate and subject to revision. Learn more.